How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Self-dual simple cyclotomic modules give the upper global basis
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited through the lower projective, canonical crystal, restricted-dual and global-basis duality suppliers.
In exactly the symmetric normalized-, characteristic-zero, loopless arbitrary-multiedge geometric-parameter regime of the lower projective theorem, the CANONICAL restricted-dual identification maps normalized -self-dual simple classes bijectively to the upper global basis, form-dual to the lower projective basis under the actual highest-weight contravariant form. A simple and its normalized projective COVER have the same label; this is the cover/simple correspondence, not projective Hom duality applied to a simple. Canonical operators have the same projective normalization. The alternative KK module action remains valid, but its intertwiner is on root and sends a simple to that defect-rescaled upper vector. The unrescaled upper-basis claim is made only for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice. The geometric-parameter regime of the lower projective theorem, the normalized -self-dual simples and normalized covers, and the two restricted-dual identifications.
The quotient-cover pairing (Cyclotomic projective covers and dualities descend through the quotient): in normalized bases.
The lower projective theorem (Self-dual indecomposable cyclotomic projectives give the lower global basis): is the lower global vector with the same crystal label.
The integral projective and identifications (The cyclotomic projective is the integral highest-weight module, The cyclotomic module is the restricted dual integral highest-weight module) and the upper/lower duality and crystal compatibility (Upper and lower global bases are dual and crystal compatible, The upper (form-dual) global basis and the required perfectness of the integral pairing, Cyclotomic diagram duality and graded module duals).
Proof
Proof technique: pair the normalized simple functional against the lower basis, identify it with the form-dual lower functional, and apply the upper/lower duality theorem; then compare the two normalizations.
The functional . By [F1] the pairing is diagonal in normalized bases, and by [F2] the class is the lower global vector with the same crystal label; therefore is exactly the weightwise dual lower-basis functional with that label.
Identification with the upper global basis. The integral projective identification [F3] identifies the tensor form on projectives with the actual highest-weight contravariant form; the upper/lower duality theorem identifies these restricted dual functionals with the upper global vectors and preserves crystal labels. This proves the bijection and the normalization statements, using neither a generic negative-half form nor a vector-dual trace shift.
Cover/simple correspondence and the two actions. A simple and its normalized projective cover have the same label by the cover/simple correspondence of [F2], not by applying projective Hom duality to a simple. The theorem [F3] proves the canonical action and its defect-rescaled KK version; keeping the two maps distinct preserves both sound quantum actions and the rank-one check, with on root , so that only gives the unrescaled upper-basis claim. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the lower projective and canonical crystal suppliers, the QG-5 global-basis duality and the restricted-dual identifications of [F2] and [F3].
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Cyclotomic diagram duality and graded module duals
- The upper (form-dual) global basis and the required perfectness of the integral pairing
- Cyclotomic projective covers and dualities descend through the quotient
- The cyclotomic module $G_0$ is the restricted dual integral highest-weight module
- The cyclotomic projective $K_0$ is the integral highest-weight module
- Self-dual indecomposable cyclotomic projectives give the lower global basis
- Simple and indecomposable-projective crystals agree with $B(\Lambda)$
- Upper and lower global bases are dual and crystal compatible
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Seok-Jin Kang and Masaki Kashiwara, Categorification of Highest Weight Modules via Khovanov-Lauda-Rouquier Algebras, arXiv:1102.4677v4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Masaki Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991) 465-516 (standard reference, not scraped)