How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The upper (form-dual) global basis and the required perfectness of the integral pairing
Definition
Let be or an integrable highest weight module , with finite root or label components, lower global -lattice of The lower global basis of and of a highest weight module with rational lower charts , of the balanced triple Balanced triples over the two charts of and the globalization map, and let be the normalized homogeneous Kashiwara half form, respectively the contravariant polarization of The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion, The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral and The contravariant form on an integrable highest weight module.
The restricted graded integral form-dual of is the direct sum being taken over weight components so that ordinary (not product) duals of the infinite-dimensional pieces are used; the dual rational charts are The upper global family is the unique homogeneous field family () determined by the inverse Gram system it is defined componentwise by finite-dimensional linear algebra because each component form is nondegenerate. The upper bar is the -adjoint semilinear involution characterized by , and the upper Kashiwara operators are the adjoints and , defined componentwise by the same nondegenerate finite-dimensional forms; they are in general distinct from the lower operators.
The upper zero chart is the dual chart , and after the grand loop its perfection identifies it with ; the upper infinity chart is not automatically the lower bar chart , and no such identification is asserted. Existence of the upper family in the integral lattices, weightwise perfect -duality, dual globalization in these genuine dual charts and crystal compatibility for the adjoint operators are the exact conclusions of Upper and lower global bases are dual and crystal compatible; adjacent divided-string formulas of the next lemma supply the adjoints of the lower string shifts with their weights, so no unweighted adjunction, no full product identification , no lower -self-duality, no ordinary-bar fixedness and no unqualified upper/lower operator equality is assumed here.
Depends on
- The lower global basis of $U_q^-$ and of a highest weight module
- Bar invariance, congruence and uniqueness of the lower global basis
- The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module
- The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion
- The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral
- The contravariant form on an integrable highest weight module
- Crystal lattice polarizations are perfect at $q=0$
Used by
- The canonical and quasi-canonical bases need not coincide Counterexample
- The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases Definition
- Lower and upper global bases in a small highest weight module Example
- Matching the canonical and lower global normalizations in rank one and A₂ Example
- Standard Fock vectors expand in the upper global basis Lemma
- Ariki's canonical basis theorem in characteristic zero Theorem
- Self-dual simple cyclotomic modules give the upper global basis Theorem
- Standard tableau monomials form a basis of the highest weight Fock submodule Theorem
- The cyclotomic module G₀ is the restricted dual integral highest-weight module Theorem
- The highest weight Fock submodule carries the quantum-group global bases Theorem
- Upper and lower global bases are dual and crystal compatible Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Masaki Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras, Duke Mathematical Journal 63 (1991), 465–516 (standard reference, not scraped)
- George Lusztig, Introduction to Quantum Groups (Progress in Mathematics 110, Birkhauser, 1993; second printing 1994; author-hosted scan) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jonathan Brundan, Dual Canonical Bases and Kazhdan–Lusztig Polynomials, arXiv:math/0509700v2 (Transform. Groups 14 (2009), 535–558) (standard reference, not scraped)