How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The lower global basis of and of a highest weight module
Definition
Let be or , let be or , let be the bar lattice, all as in The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module and The integral residue lattices and , and let be the balanced intersection. Let be or .
By The highest weight and negative half integral crystal triples are balanced the integral triple is balanced componentwise: for every root or label degree the canonical map is an isomorphism onto the free -span of the crystal classes of that degree. For define the lower global lift to be the unique element of whose residue class in is . The family is the lower global basis of (of or of ).
With these definitions, the theorem's extensions give the basis assertions: the -span of is , its -span is , its -span is , and its -span is , while after tensoring with the residue classes of the are the full rational crystal spaces; in particular is an -basis of . Each is bar fixed, is not defined, and no equality of with the whole Laurent module is implied; the identification of the integral residue subgroup with for highest modules is the corresponding part of the same theorem. The lifts are characterized by the simultaneous balanced intersection, not by an unproved unitriangular word-basis condition, and all definitions apply componentwise on finite root or label components and are extended by their direct sums.
Depends on
Used by
- Bar invariance and the congruence modulo q do not imply balancedness Counterexample
- The canonical and quasi-canonical bases need not coincide Counterexample
- Word projectives need not give lower global basis vectors Counterexample
- The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases Definition
- The upper (form-dual) global basis and the required perfectness of the integral pairing Definition
- Lower and upper global bases in a small highest weight module Example
- Matching the canonical and lower global normalizations in rank one and A₂ Example
- The balanced triple and global basis for the two-dimensional U_q(sl₂)-module Example
- Cyclotomic extension of scalars respects the based quotient Lemma
- Divided-power integrality of the quasi-R action on based lattices Lemma
- Standard Fock vectors expand in the upper global basis Lemma
- Specialization of the global bases and the root-of-unity boundary Proposition
- Ariki's canonical basis theorem in characteristic zero Theorem
- Bar invariance, congruence and uniqueness of the lower global basis Theorem
- Finitely generated free integral weight lattices and deformation of the classical weight character Theorem
- Lusztig's canonical basis and Kashiwara's lower global basis agree in symmetric finite ADE type Theorem
- Self-dual indecomposable cyclotomic projectives give the lower global basis Theorem
- Self-dual indecomposable KLR projectives give the lower global basis (symmetric type) Theorem
- Tensor bars on finite products of based integrable modules Theorem
- The based quotient: projection of the lower global basis to a highest weight module Theorem
- The basic representation global basis is unitriangular in the partition basis Theorem
- The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke G₀ is the dual highest weight module Theorem
- The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K₀ is the highest weight module Theorem
- The highest weight Fock submodule carries the quantum-group global bases Theorem
- The tensor-product bar on the Fock module and its truncation compatibility Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Masaki Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras, Duke Mathematical Journal 63 (1991), 465–516 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kyeonghoon Jeong, Seok-Jin Kang and Masaki Kashiwara, Crystal Bases for Quantum Generalized Kac-Moody Algebras, arXiv:math/0305390 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jonathan Brundan, Dual Canonical Bases and Kazhdan–Lusztig Polynomials, arXiv:math/0509700v2 (Transform. Groups 14 (2009), 535–558) (standard reference, not scraped)