Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence and uniqueness of the weightwise quasi-R intertwiner

Statement

Let Θ=∑ν∈Q+Θν∈C^ be the D-coevaluation family of the diagonal root-height completion C^ of The root-height completion for weightwise quasi-R intertwiners, built from the normalized Drinfeld pairing D of The Drinfeld pairing between the positive and negative quantum halves and its homogeneous dual bases (Homogeneous dual-basis sums: basis independence and weightwise finiteness, The Drinfeld pairing is nondegenerate in each root degree and matches the shuffle pairing). Then Θ is the unique normalized bar-coproduct intertwiner for the library coproduct Δ: that is, Δ(u)Θ=Θ Δ‾(u)for all u∈Uq(g),Δ‾(u)=(ψ⊗ψ)Δ(ψ(u)), among families with Θ0=1. Its generator recursions are [1⊗Ei,Θν]=Θν−αi(Ei⊗Ki)−(Ei⊗Ki−1)Θν−αi, [Fi⊗1,Θν]=Θν−αi(Ki−1⊗Fi)−(Ki⊗Fi)Θν−αi, where components of negative root degree are 0 and the toral parts commute because Θν has toral weight zero. In rank one, Θnαi=(qi−qi−1)n[n]qi2! Ei(n)⊗Fi(n) with [n]qi2!=∏r=1n(1+qi2+⋯+qi2(r−1)), so that Θαi=(qi−qi−1)Ei⊗Fi. The family evaluates precisely under the explicit finite-support hypotheses of the completion. This is not the native unscaled doubled-torus ΨΔop relation, and no integral algebra coefficient claim is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Drinfeld–Jimbo algebra Uq(g) with coproduct Δ, counit ε and antipode S of The Drinfeld–Jimbo formulas define a Hopf algebra, the fixed Q-linear automorphism ψ with ψ(q)=q−1, ψ(Ei)=Ei, ψ(Fi)=Fi, ψ(Kh)=Kh−1 (The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary), the resulting Δ‾(u)=(ψ⊗ψ)Δ(ψ(u)), the diagonal root-height completion C^ with Θ0=1 and its finite-support action of The root-height completion for weightwise quasi-R intertwiners, and the normalized pairing D of The Drinfeld pairing between the positive and negative quantum halves.

[F1]

Dual-basis sums (Homogeneous dual-basis sums: basis independence and weightwise finiteness): for each ν the element Θν=∑aua⊗va over any homogeneous basis (ua) of Uq+[ν] with D-dual basis (va) is independent of the choice, is a finite Q-linear combination of the tensor product Uq+[ν]⊗Uq−[−ν], and Θ0=1; the family acts vectorwise finitely exactly under the completion's hypotheses.

[F2]

Perfect graded pairing (The Drinfeld pairing is nondegenerate in each root degree and matches the shuffle pairing): D is homogeneous, perfect on every finite root degree, and satisfies the Hopf adjunctions D(x,yy′)=∑D(x(1),y)D(x(2),y′),D(xx′,y)=∑D(x,y(1))D(x′,y(2)) for the library coproduct on Uq− and the opposite coproduct on Uq+ (The Drinfeld pairing between the positive and negative quantum halves), together with the normalization D(Ei,Fj)=δij(qi−qi−1)−1 and D(Ei(n),Fi(n))=qi−n(n−1)/2/([n]i!(qi−qi−1)n). On the toral directions D(Kν,Kμ)=q(ν,μ).

[F3]

Presentation transport (The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary): the semilinear source-to-library isomorphism φ(v)=q−1, φ(EiL)=Ei, φ(FiL)=Fi, φ(KhL)=K−h carries Lusztig's source coproduct ΔL and source form BL to the library coproduct and normalized form up to the tensor flip; the source coefficient (−1)ht ν∏iviνi times the BL-coevaluation equals dν times the BK-coevaluation exactly. The comparison maps in the completed tensor square are coefficientwise isomorphisms on homogeneous components.

[F4]

Skew derivations and separation (Kashiwara's skew derivations ei′ and ei′′ on the negative half, Separation of the negative half by iterated skew derivations): the Serre presentation of Uq− defines left and right skew derivations ei′, ei′′ with ei′(xy)=ei′(x)y+qi⟨wt⁡(x),hi⟩xei′(y) for homogeneous x, with the opposite twist for ei′′ and the quotient rule for the toral numerators; and for every nonzero positive-height element of Uq+ some iterated skew derivative is nonzero, so a positive-degree half element all of whose iterated derivatives vanish is zero.

[F5]

Hopf identities (The Drinfeld–Jimbo formulas define a Hopf algebra): Δ,Δ‾ are algebra homomorphisms; Δ‾(u)=(ψ⊗ψ)Δ(ψ(u)) is compatible with the algebra structure and Δ‾≡Δ on the toral subalgebra; Δ(Ei)=Ei⊗Ki−1+1⊗Ei, Δ(Fi)=Fi⊗1+Ki⊗Fi, so Δ‾(Ei)=Ei⊗Ki+1⊗Ei and Δ‾(Fi)=Fi⊗1+Ki−1⊗Fi.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

The candidate family. Define Θν by [F1] and put Θ=∑νΘν∈C^; then Θ0=1 and, by [F1], the family is independent of all choices of bases and acts vectorwise finitely under the completion's hypotheses. Its components are toral weight zero, because each Θν pairs the root degrees ν and −ν.

1.2F2F4F5algebra

The Ei recursion by contraction. Write ci=qi−qi−1 and ν(hi)=∑jνjaij. For z∈U−[−ν], the normalized form recursion gives D(Eix,z)=ci−1D(x,ei′z). Right multiplication gives D(xEi,z)=ci−1qi2−ν(hi)D(x,ei′′z): reversing both words in the matching-permutation form preserves the crossing exponents, and the right deletion map is ⋆ei′⋆=qi2−ν(hi)ei′′ on this degree. The latter identity follows on each word by comparing the weights before and after the deleted i-letter. Contract the first slot of the proposed recursion with D(−,z). Its left side becomes [Ei,z]=(Kiei′′z−Ki−1ei′z)/ci. Its right side becomes ci−1(qi2−ν(hi)ei′′zKi−Ki−1ei′z), which is equal because ei′′z has weight −ν+αi. Perfectness of D makes these equal contractions the asserted tensor identity.

2.1F5step 1.1

Generator identities: toral case and structure of the verification. For u=Kh both Δ(Kh)=Kh⊗Kh and Δ‾(Kh)=(ψ⊗ψ)(K−h⊗K−h)=Kh⊗Kh, and Θν commutes with Kh⊗Kh by its zero total toral weight, so Δ(Kh)Θ=ΘΔ‾(Kh). Since Δ and Δ‾ are algebra homomorphisms [F5], once the two root-generator identities hold, the identity extends to all of Uq(g).

3.1F2F4F5step 1.2step 2.1algebra

The Fi recursion. Identify the positive half with the negative half by ι, and write ei′+=ι−1ei′ι and ei′′+=ι−1ei′′ι. For x∈U+[ν], contract the second slot with D(x,−). Symmetry of BK and the two multiplication adjunctions in step 1.2 make the right side of the proposed Fi recursion equal ci−1(qi2−ν(hi)ei′′+xKi−1−Kiei′+x). The positive version of the defining commutator, obtained by Ei↔Fi, Ki↔Ki−1, is [Fi,x]=(Ki−1ei′′+x−Kiei′+x)/ci. Toral crossing makes the expressions equal. Perfectness gives the Fi recursion. Together with step 1.2 and the toral identity, it proves intertwining on every generator, and hence on the generated algebra.

4.1F1F2F4step 3.1

Uniqueness. Let Θ,Θ′ be two normalized solutions and Ω=Θ−Θ′, so Ω∈C^, Ω0=0, and Δ(u)Ω=ΩΔ‾(u) for all u. Suppose Ω≠0 and let ν0 be a minimal root degree with Ων0≠0; by minimality the αi-recursions of step 3.1 applied to Ω carry no lower-degree terms, so for every i the skew derivatives of the two coefficient tensors of Ων0 vanish, in the sense of the two recursions. Expanding Ων0 in homogeneous bases of Uq+[ν0] and testing against D-dual vectors, the two recursions and [F2] turn the generator identities into the statement that all iterated skew derivatives of every coefficient vector in the positive half vanish; the separation theorem [F4] then forces every coefficient of Ων0 to be zero, a contradiction. Hence Ω=0 and the normalized solution is unique.

5.1F2step 4.1

Rank-one coefficient. Let I={i}. Since the degree-nαi component of Uq+ with its basis element Ei(n) pairs with Fi(n) by [F2] with value D(Ei(n),Fi(n))=qi−n(n−1)/2/([n]i!(qi−qi−1)n), the inverse coefficient is (D(Ei(n),Fi(n)))−1=(qi−qi−1)nqin(n−1)/2[n]i!=(qi−qi−1)n[n]qi2!, using [n]qi2!=∏r=1n(1+⋯+qi2(r−1))=qin(n−1)/2[n]i!. Hence Θnαi=(qi−qi−1)n[n]qi2!Ei(n)⊗Fi(n), and for n=1 this is Θαi=(qi−qi−1)Ei⊗Fi.

6.1F3step 4.1step 5.1∎

Conclusion and scope. Steps 1.1–3.1 construct the normalized family and the two generator recursions; step 4.1 proves uniqueness by minimal degree and separation; step 5.1 computes the rank-one coefficient. The construction used only the graded pairing, the completion's finite-support hypotheses and the presentation's skew derivations, so the family is the D-coevaluation of the completion and not the unscaled doubled-torus normalization as recorded by the transport dictionary of [F3]; no integrality of coefficients was asserted at any point.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources