Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kashiwara's skew derivations ei′ and ei′′ on the negative half

Definition

Let Uq(g) be the Drinfeld–Jimbo algebra of The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations, with its generated subalgebras Uq−,Uq0,Uq+ and root gradings Uq−=⨁ν∈Q+Uq−[−ν] of Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings (Q+=⨁iZ≥0αi, height ht⁡ of Kac Moody root lattice height and positive cone). Fix i∈I and write Ki:=Kdihi, so that KiFjKi−1=qi−aijFj and qi−qi−1≠0.

For every P∈Uq− there exist unique elements Q,R∈Uq− with

EiP−PEi=KiQ−Ki−1Rqi−qi−1.

Define the Kashiwara skew derivations ei′,ei′′:Uq−→Uq− by

ei′(P):=Randei′′(P):=Q.

Thus ei′ is the operator whose value is the coefficient of Ki−1 and ei′′ is the operator whose value is the coefficient of Ki in the commutator with Ei. The maps have the following properties, all proved in the Verification below.

(a) ei′ and ei′′ are Q(q)-linear, vanish on 1, and ei′(Fj)=ei′′(Fj)=δij for all j∈I.

(b) (Twisted Leibniz rules) For homogeneous x,y∈Uq−, with the actual weight wt⁡(x)∈Q of Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings, ei′(xy)=ei′(x)y+qi⟨wt⁡(x),hi⟩x ei′(y),ei′′(xy)=ei′′(x)y+qi−⟨wt⁡(x),hi⟩x ei′′(y).

(c) (Commutation with the generators) For all j∈I and all y∈Uq−, ei′(Fjy)=qi−aijFj ei′(y)+δijy,ei′′(Fjy)=qiaijFj ei′′(y)+δijy,

equivalently ei′Fj=qi−aijFjei′+δij and ei′′Fj=qiaijFjei′′+δij as operators on Uq−.

(d) (Grading, height and nilpotence) For every ν∈Q+,

ei′(Uq−[−ν]), ei′′(Uq−[−ν]) ⊆ Uq−[−(ν−αi)],

the right-hand side being 0 when ν−αi∉Q+. In particular both maps raise the actual weight by αi, lower the positive height by one, and are locally nilpotent: (ei′)k(P)=(ei′′)k(P)=0 for k larger than the height of the degree of a homogeneous P.

(e) (Bar compatibility) Let ψ be the semilinear algebra involution q↦q−1, Ei↦Ei, Fi↦Fi, Kh↦K−h of The Chevalley involution, bar involution, and contravariant anti-involution preserve the Drinfeld–Jimbo ideal. Then ei′′=ψ ei′ ψ on Uq−.

The commutator construction also fixes the orientation: the Ki−1-coefficient is ei′ and the Ki-coefficient is ei′′. The twists qi±⟨wt⁡(x),hi⟩ in (b) are the twists of the corresponding coefficient maps of the negative-half coproduct in the source's dictionary; the explicit commutator computation used here is the definition of record, and no imaginary-simple-root convention is needed, since every Cartan datum of this library has aii=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed i∈I, the Drinfeld–Jimbo algebra Uq(g) and its generated subalgebras, the root grading and the height ht⁡:Q+→Z≥0 (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations, Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings, Kac Moody root lattice height and positive cone), and the finite words w=Fj1⋯Fjm (m≥0, the empty word for m=0) in the negative generators.

[F1]

The multiplication Uq−⊗Q(q)Uq0⊗Q(q)Uq+→Uq(g) is a vector-space isomorphism, and the Kh (h∈P∨) are linearly independent; every element of Uq− is a finite Q(q)-linear combination of words in the Fj; the root grading Uq(g)=⨁β∈QUq(g)[β] has Uq−[−ν] Uq0⊆Uq(g)[−ν] and the images of the subspaces Uq−[−ν]⊗Uq0⊗Q(q) for distinct ν are linearly independent (Triangular decomposition of a quantized enveloping algebra, Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings).

[F2]

For homogeneous x∈Uq(g) of degree β and h∈P∨, KhxKh−1=qβ(h)x, hence Khx=qβ(h)xKh and Kh−1x=q−β(h)xKh−1; in particular KiFj=qi−aijFjKi and Ki−1Fj=qiaijFjKi−1 ( Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings, Kac Moody root lattice height and positive cone for wt⁡(Fj)=−αj).

[F3]

EiFj−FjEi=δij(Ki−Ki−1)/(qi−qi−1) in Uq(g) (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations).

[F4]

ψ is an involutive semilinear algebra automorphism of Uq(g) with ψ(q)=q−1, ψ(Ei)=Ei, ψ(Fi)=Fi, ψ(Kh)=K−h; it preserves Uq− (The Chevalley involution, bar involution, and contravariant anti-involution preserve the Drinfeld–Jimbo ideal).

[F5]

The height is additive: ht⁡(ν−αi)=ht⁡(ν)−1 for ν−αi∈Q+; if ν−kαi∈Q+ then ht⁡(ν−kαi)=ht⁡(ν)−k≥0, so there is no word of that degree once k>ht⁡(ν); and the degrees of the direct sum ⨁ν∈Q+Uq−[−ν] are pairwise distinct (Kac Moody root lattice height and positive cone, Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings).

[F6]

qi=qdi with di>0, so qi−qi−1≠0 in Q(q) (Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi).

Verification

technique · Construct $Q_w,R_w$ on words by moving $E_i$ to the right, prove the defining identity on words by induction, and obtain existence and uniqueness for all elements from [F1] and the linear independence of the toral coefficients
1.1givenF1F2construct

For each word w=Fj1⋯Fjm define Qw,Rw∈Uq− by recursion on m: for the empty word Q1:=R1:=0, and for m≥1, with w′=Fj2⋯Fjm, set Qw:=qiaij1Fj1Qw′+δij1w′ and Rw:=qi−aij1Fj1Rw′+δij1w′. Each is a finite Q(q)-linear combination of words. If w has degree −ν, every nonzero term of Qw,Rw has degree −ν+αi: inductively a nonzero Qw′,Rw′ has degree deg⁡w′+αi, multiplication by Fj1 gives deg⁡w+αi, and the term δij1w′ has that degree when j1=i.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

For every word w one has Eiw−wEi=(KiQw−Ki−1Rw)/(qi−qi−1). For m=0 both sides vanish. For m≥1, write w=Fj1w′. Multiplying the inductive identity for w′ by Fj1 on the left gives Fj1Eiw′=Fj1w′Ei+Fj1KiQw′/(qi−qi−1)−Fj1Ki−1Rw′/(qi−qi−1), and [F3] gives EiFj1−Fj1Ei=δij1(Ki−Ki−1)/(qi−qi−1). Adding, and using [F2] in the form Fj1Ki=qiaij1KiFj1, Fj1Ki−1=qi−aij1Ki−1Fj1, yields Eiw−wEi=(Ki(qiaij1Fj1Qw′+δij1w′)−Ki−1(qi−aij1Fj1Rw′+δij1w′))/(qi−qi−1)=(KiQw−Ki−1Rw)/(qi−qi−1), which is the claim.

3.1step 2.1F1algebra

Existence follows for every P∈Uq−: by [F1] write P=∑wcww as a finite linear combination of words, and set Q:=∑wcwQw, R:=∑wcwRw. Summing the identities of step 2.1 with coefficients cw gives EiP−PEi=(KiQ−Ki−1R)/(qi−qi−1).

4.1step 3.1F1F2F6algebra

For uniqueness suppose KiQ−Ki−1R=0 with Q,R∈Uq−. Decompose Q=∑νQν, R=∑νRν into the finitely many homogeneous components with Qν,Rν∈Uq−[−ν] (Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings). By [F2], (KiQν−Ki−1Rν)Ki=qi−ν(hi)QνKi2−qiν(hi)Rν after multiplying on the right by Ki; the terms for distinct ν lie in distinct degrees −ν of the direct sum [F1], so for every ν the identity qi−ν(hi)Qν⊗Ki2=qiν(hi)Rν⊗1 holds in Uq−[−ν]⊗Uq0 under the injective multiplication map. Applying id⊗λ, where λ is the linear functional on Uq0 with λ(K2dihi)=1 and λ(Kh)=0 for h≠2dihi (existence and well-definedness by the linear independence in [F1]), gives Qν=0; then Rν=0. Hence Q=R=0, and two pairs (Q,R), (Q′,R′) giving the same commutator have Q=Q′ and R=R′.

5.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1F4algebra

Consequently ei′ and ei′′ are well defined on all of Uq−; they are Q(q)-linear because the defining identity is linear in P: if P=c1P1+c2P2, the pairs (c1Q(P1)+c2Q(P2), c1R(P1)+c2R(P2)) satisfy the defining identity for P, so by uniqueness each map is linear. The recursion gives Q1=R1=0, hence ei′(1)=ei′′(1)=0; and for the one-letter word w=Fj the recursion gives QFj=RFj=δij, hence ei′(Fj)=ei′′(Fj)=δij.

5.2step 4.1F2algebra

For homogeneous x,y∈Uq− decompose Ei(xy)−(xy)Ei=(Eix−xEi)y+x(Eiy−yEi) and substitute the defining identities for x and y: the right side equals (Kiei′′(x)y−Ki−1ei′(x)y+xKiei′′(y)−xKi−1ei′(y))/(qi−qi−1). By [F2] with wt⁡(x) in place of β, xKi=Kiqi−⟨wt⁡(x),hi⟩x and xKi−1=Ki−1qi⟨wt⁡(x),hi⟩x. Collecting the Ki- and Ki−1-coefficients and using the uniqueness of step 4.1 yields the two twisted Leibniz rules of (b).

6.1step 1.1step 5.1F5algebra

Grading and nilpotence. The degree computation of step 1.1 shows that for a word w of degree −ν, every nonzero term of Qw,Rw has degree −ν+αi. These are negative words, so both coefficients vanish if ν−αi∉Q+; otherwise they belong to Uq−[−(ν−αi)]. By linearity the same holds on every homogeneous component. Thus ei′,ei′′ raise actual degree by αi and lower positive height by one, and their k-th powers vanish on degree −ν for k>ht⁡(ν). Every vector has finite homogeneous support, so both maps are locally nilpotent.

6.2step 5.1step 5.2algebra

The commutation relations of (c) are the case x=Fj of the Leibniz rules: wt⁡(Fj)=−αj, so qi⟨wt⁡(Fj),hi⟩=qi−aij and qi−⟨wt⁡(Fj),hi⟩=qiaij, while ei′(Fj)=ei′′(Fj)=δij by step 5.1. Reading the resulting identities ei′(Fjy)=qi−aijFjei′(y)+δijy and ei′′(Fjy)=qiaijFjei′′(y)+δijy as operator identities gives (c).

7.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 5.2step 6.2F4algebra∎

For the bar relation, apply the semilinear algebra automorphism ψ of [F4] to the defining identity of P: since ψ(Ei)=Ei, ψ(Ki)=Ki−1 and ψ(qi−qi−1)=−(qi−qi−1), one gets Eiψ(P)−ψ(P)Ei=(Kiψ(ei′(P))−Ki−1ψ(ei′′(P)))/(qi−qi−1). Comparing with the defining identity for ψ(P), namely Eiψ(P)−ψ(P)Ei=(Kiei′′(ψ(P))−Ki−1ei′(ψ(P)))/(qi−qi−1), uniqueness (step 4.1) gives ei′′(ψ(P))=ψ(ei′(P)) and ei′(ψ(P))=ψ(ei′′(P)). Applying the second identity to ψ(P) in place of P and using ψ2=id gives ei′′(P)=ψ(ei′(ψ(P))), that is, ei′′=ψei′ψ. This proves (a)–(e) and completes the definition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources