Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The KLR Cartan pairing is the Lusztig-normalized half form

Statement

Let Q be a KLR datum as in The quiver Hecke (KLR) algebra of a symmetrizable Cartan datum, let BK be the normalized Lusztig-Kashiwara form on the negative half of The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion and put BL:=CνBK on the weight component ν, Cν=∏i(1−qi2)−νi, the Lusztig-normalized form of The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary. Then for homogeneous x,y∈Afν the Cartan pairing of The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group satisfies (γ(x),γ(y))KLR=BL(x,y)=Cν BK(x,y), where γ:Af→K0(R) is the algebra homomorphism of The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations. Equivalently, the two bilinear forms are equal under the identification of divided-power classes; in particular the KLR pairing is Q(q)-nondegenerate on each finite weight component Afν⊗AQ(q) after extending scalars, and (γ(x),γ(y))KLR′=BL(x‾,y), where bar acts on the first input. On generators: ([Pi],[Pj])=δij(1−qi2)−1=BL(θi,θj) and ([Pi,n],[Pi,n])=BL(θi(n),θi(n))=∏a=1n(1−qi2a)−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A KLR datum Q, the Cartan pairing of The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group on K0(R), the homomorphism γ of The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations, the normalized half form BK of The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion with skew derivations ei′ of Kashiwara's skew derivations ei′ and ei′′ on the negative half, and the normalization factor Cν=∏i(1−qi2)−νi of The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary.

[F1]

Normalization and adjunction (The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group): the tensor form is symmetric and bilinear with ([Pi],[Pi])=(1−qi2)−1 and ([Pi],[Pj])=0 for i≠j, and Ind is left adjoint to Res.

[F2]

Mackey and the coproduct comparison (The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations): [Res] is an algebra homomorphism for the twisted product, so the pairing satisfies the adjunction identities (x,yy′)=(r(x),y⊗y′) and (xx′,y)=(x⊗x′,r(y)) with r=[Res].

[F3]

Determination of BK (The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion): axioms (H), (N), (R): homogeneity, B(1,1)=1 and B(FiP,Q)=B(P,ei′Q) determine B uniquely, and peeling first letters reduces every evaluation to the base case.

[F4]

Normalization dictionary (The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary): with the source-to-library parameter transport φ:Q(v)→Q(q), φ(v)=q−1 the root-colour factor Cν converts the Kashiwara recursion into BL(FiP,Q)=(1−qi2)−1BL(P,ei′Q) and BL has the generator value (1−qi2)−1.

[F5]

Nondegeneracy (The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral, clause (iii)): for every 0≠x∈Uq− there is y with (x,y)≠0; equivalently the form restricted to each finite-dimensional graded piece is nondegenerate. Its construction uses the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct; compare the two forms on a spanning set by the same recursive characterization, then upgrade with the supplier's nondegeneracy
1.1givenF1F2F4algebra

(Tensor adjunction.) Write A=R(β+γ), B=R(β)⊗R(γ) and e=e(β,γ). Reflection fixes each block and gives (Ae⊗BX)ψ=Xψ⊗BeA, with the same total grading. Thus T(Ind⁡X,Y)=gdim(Xψ⊗BeY)=TB(X,Res⁡Y). For X=P⊠Q, the last tensor factorizes, giving the tensor-product form. Symmetry supplies the adjunction in the other variable. Pull this identity back through γ, using its coproduct compatibility from [F2]. The coefficient of Fi⊗z in r(y) is ei′y: on words this follows by deleting an i and accumulating qi−aij for each preceding letter in the twisted product, exactly the recursion of [F4]. Weight orthogonality therefore gives T(γ(Fix),γ(y))=(1−qi2)−1T(γ(x),γ(ei′y)), with vacuum value 1.

1.2givenF3F4algebra

(Abstract side.) BK is characterized by (H), (N), (R) of [F3], and its normalized multiple BL=CνBK satisfies the generator value BL(θi,θj)=δij(1−qi2)−1 and the recursion BL(FiP,Q)=(1−qi2)−1BL(P,ei′Q) by [F4]; the same recursion with the same base value determines every value on word monomials inductively, since peeling the first letter of the first argument and applying the recursion reduces the positive height by one.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

(Comparison on monomials.) The KLR pairing and BL satisfy the same recursion and the same value at 1: on the KLR side this is step 1.1 with γ(Fi)=γ(θi)=[Pi,1]=[Pi] and the identification of the restriction class with the coproduct; on the abstract side it is step 1.2. Induction on the height of the weight components therefore gives (γ(x),γ(y))KLR=BL(x,y) on all divided-power monomials and hence on all of Af by bilinearity, using that γ is onto the classes of the divided words by The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations. Injectivity of γ is not used: the equality is checked on the spanning monomials.

3.1step 2.1F4F5algebra∎

(Nondegeneracy and generator values.) By [F5] the form BK, hence the unit multiple BL, is nondegenerate on each finite weight component, so the KLR tensor pairing is nondegenerate there as well; the Axiom of Choice enters only through this supplier, and the categorical comparison of steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 is choice-free. The Hom-form identity (γ(x),γ(y))′=BL(x‾,y) follows from h(P,Q)=T(P#,Q) of The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group and γ(x‾)=γ(x)# from The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations, clause (iii). For the rank-one divided power, γ(θi(n))=[Pi,n] gives ([Pi,n],[Pi,n])=∏a=1n(1−qi2a)−1, matching BL(θi(n),θi(n)) by the recursion of step 1.2; for n=1 this is the generator value already recorded.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources