How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The KLR Cartan pairing is the Lusztig-normalized half form
Statement
Let be a KLR datum as in The quiver Hecke (KLR) algebra of a symmetrizable Cartan datum, let be the normalized Lusztig-Kashiwara form on the negative half of The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion and put on the weight component , , the Lusztig-normalized form of The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary. Then for homogeneous the Cartan pairing of The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group satisfies where is the algebra homomorphism of The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations. Equivalently, the two bilinear forms are equal under the identification of divided-power classes; in particular the KLR pairing is -nondegenerate on each finite weight component after extending scalars, and , where bar acts on the first input. On generators: and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A KLR datum , the Cartan pairing of The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group on , the homomorphism of The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations, the normalized half form of The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion with skew derivations of Kashiwara's skew derivations and on the negative half, and the normalization factor of The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary.
Normalization and adjunction (The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group): the tensor form is symmetric and bilinear with and for , and is left adjoint to .
Mackey and the coproduct comparison (The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations): is an algebra homomorphism for the twisted product, so the pairing satisfies the adjunction identities and with .
Determination of (The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion): axioms (H), (N), (R): homogeneity, and determine uniquely, and peeling first letters reduces every evaluation to the base case.
Normalization dictionary (The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary): with the source-to-library parameter transport , the root-colour factor converts the Kashiwara recursion into and has the generator value .
Nondegeneracy (The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral, clause (iii)): for every there is with ; equivalently the form restricted to each finite-dimensional graded piece is nondegenerate. Its construction uses the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
(Tensor adjunction.) Write , and . Reflection fixes each block and gives , with the same total grading. Thus . For , the last tensor factorizes, giving the tensor-product form. Symmetry supplies the adjunction in the other variable. Pull this identity back through , using its coproduct compatibility from [F2]. The coefficient of in is : on words this follows by deleting an and accumulating for each preceding letter in the twisted product, exactly the recursion of [F4]. Weight orthogonality therefore gives , with vacuum value .
(Abstract side.) is characterized by (H), (N), (R) of [F3], and its normalized multiple satisfies the generator value and the recursion by [F4]; the same recursion with the same base value determines every value on word monomials inductively, since peeling the first letter of the first argument and applying the recursion reduces the positive height by one.
(Comparison on monomials.) The KLR pairing and satisfy the same recursion and the same value at : on the KLR side this is step 1.1 with and the identification of the restriction class with the coproduct; on the abstract side it is step 1.2. Induction on the height of the weight components therefore gives on all divided-power monomials and hence on all of by bilinearity, using that is onto the classes of the divided words by The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations. Injectivity of is not used: the equality is checked on the spanning monomials.
(Nondegeneracy and generator values.) By [F5] the form , hence the unit multiple , is nondegenerate on each finite weight component, so the KLR tensor pairing is nondegenerate there as well; the Axiom of Choice enters only through this supplier, and the categorical comparison of steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 is choice-free. The Hom-form identity follows from of The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group and from The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations, clause (iii). For the rank-one divided power, gives , matching by the recursion of step 1.2; for this is the generator value already recorded.
Depends on
- The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group
- The KLR Grothendieck ring satisfies the divided-power quantum Serre relations
- The Lusztig-Kashiwara bilinear form on the negative half: the recursion
- The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral
- Kashiwara's skew derivations $e_i'$ and $e_i''$ on the negative half
- The Lusztig divided-power integral form $U_A$
- The Lusztig–Kashiwara form, parameter and coproduct dictionary
- The bar involution and the contravariant anti-involution preserve $U_A$
- Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at $q_i$
- The Axiom of Choice
- The quiver Hecke (KLR) algebra of a symmetrizable Cartan datum
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikhail Khovanov and Aaron D. Lauda, A diagrammatic approach to categorification of quantum groups I, Representation Theory 13 (2009) 309-347, arXiv:0803.4121v2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mikhail Khovanov and Aaron D. Lauda, A diagrammatic approach to categorification of quantum groups II, Transactions of the AMS 363 (2011) 2685-2700, arXiv:0804.2080v1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Raphael Rouquier, 2-Kac-Moody Algebras, arXiv:0812.5023v3 (66 pages) (standard reference, not scraped)