Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The full toral-weight root category is braided, rigid and spherical

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited through the integral-basis and finite-type quasi-R coefficient suppliers. In the exact simply connected, simply-laced, full-weight-lattice and odd ℓ>h branch of The full toral-weight Lusztig module category, the category Cζ is a C-linear abelian braided rigid monoidal category. The tensor action is the specialized full divided-power coproduct, the unit is the counit module, and finite left and right duals use S and S−1, respectively. On the left double dual its pivotal structure is

jM(v)(f)=f(gv),g=K−2ρ∨,2ρ∨=∑α>0α∨.

The two pivotal traces are Tr⁡M(gf) and Tr⁡M(g−1f), and they are equal for every endomorphism f. Thus the pivotal structure is spherical in the strong trace sense.

Here is an actual compatible braiding, for the bicharacter χ fixed in the definition. Let Θζ be the specialization of the integral finite-type quasi-R coefficients in the positive-first/negative-second convention of Existence and uniqueness of the weightwise quasi-R intertwiner. Let DM,N act on Mλ⊗Nμ by χ(λ,μ) and set

RM,N=DM,N−1(Θ−1)M,N,cM,N=τ∘RM,N.

Every series here acts as a finite sum; R intertwines the full specialized algebra, including every higher divided power and every toral binomial, and satisfies both coproduct identities giving the two hexagons. No determinant coprimality restriction is needed for this braided structure; no nondegeneracy or modularity is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The genuine full toral-weight category, full P, coroot torus, chosen rational-pairing denominator and phase t, and the library coproduct.

[F1]

Full integral Hopf stability, all divided coproducts and the toral-binomial coproduct and antipode formulas are established in The full divided-power integral form is a Hopf form.

[F2]

In finite Cartan type the actual universal coefficients satisfy Θν∈UA+[ν]⊗AUA−[−ν] (Divided-power integrality of the quasi-R action on based lattices, statement (c) and proof 3.1). This is the algebra coefficient assertion; the present modules need not themselves be based or lifts of generic modules.

[F3]

Generically Δ(u)Θ=ΘΔ‾(u) for every u∈Uq, with Δ‾=(ψ⊗ψ)Δψ, ψ(q)=q−1, ψ(Ei)=Ei, ψ(Fi)=Fi, ψ(Kh)=K−h (Existence and uniqueness of the weightwise quasi-R intertwiner). The inverse and exact coefficient identities are proved in The quasi-R intertwiner determines its inverse and the coproduct factorizations:

Θ−1=Θ‾,

(Δ⊗id⁡)Θν=∑γ+η=ν(Θγ)23K−η(2)(Θη)13,

(id⁡⊗Δ)Θν=∑γ+η=ν(Θγ)12Kη(2)(Θη)13.

Here Kη=∏iKiηi for η=∑iηiαi and Kη(2) denotes the middle tensor position.

[F4]

The integral form and its tensor powers are free and inject into their generic counterparts (Integral triangular decomposition and freeness of the Lusztig form). Choice is inherited through [F2] and [F4], as recorded by The Axiom of Choice, and adds no assumption about lifting specialized modules.

[F5]

Actual full-divided-power finite-dimensional weight characters are Weyl invariant (Full divided powers force root-of-unity weight reflection symmetry), without semisimplicity of the root category.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

Use [F1] to define x(m⊗n)=Δ(x)(m⊗n), with the vector-space associator and unit constraints. Every summand of a divided coproduct has the required sum-weight shift. Evaluating its toral-binomial coproduct on Mλ⊗Nμ gives the Gaussian Vandermonde sum [⟨λ+μ,hi⟩+ct]ζ, so the tensor product has the full required toral weights. The counit gives weight zero on the unit, since ε(Ti,c,t)=[ct]ζ. Hopf coassociativity and the counit equations prove that the vector-space constraints are module maps and satisfy coherence. Kernels and cokernels of weight-preserving maps inherit the same scalar toral and shift identities; direct sums do also. The full toral characters separate the integer labels: writing n=aℓ+b, 0≤b<ℓ, the root Gaussian block identity gives [nℓ]ζ=ζℓ(n−ℓ)a. Indeed express the symmetric Gaussian as qℓ(n−ℓ) times the ordinary Gaussian at q−2 and take the degree-ℓ coefficient in the length-ℓ blocks of its generating product; for negative n the inverse product gives the same integer a. The eigenvalue of Ki determines b and the displayed sign factor, and the binomial eigenvalue then determines a. Since the simple coroots distinguish full P-weights, every algebra module map automatically preserves weights. Thus the category is also a full subcategory of the module category. Therefore it is linear and abelian, and the tensor product stays in it.

1.2F1F2F3F4algebra

We first justify specialization of the completed identities for all integral generators, rather than deducing higher identities from ordinary generators at the root. By [F2] every Θν has integral algebra coefficients. Since ψ preserves the divided powers, toral group elements and binomials (indeed ψ(Ti,c,t)=Ti,c,t), its bar also has integral coefficients. For each individual u=Ei(r),Fi(r),Kh,Ti,c,t, both sides of the generic identity in [F3] have, in each bi-root-degree, finitely many terms in UA⊗AUA: the coproduct of u is finite by [F1] and its possible root degrees are finite. The two sides are equal in the generic tensor square, so [F4] makes them equal already over A. The same argument in the free triple tensor product treats both factorizations in [F3], and the inverse convolution identities have only finitely many decompositions of each positive root degree. Consequently all these identities specialize at q=ζ. This proves specialized intertwining for the higher divided powers independently, without dividing by [r]ζ! or requiring a generic lift of any module.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

On M∗=Hom⁡C(M,C) give the left action (xf)(m)=f(S(x)m) and set (M∗)−λ=(Mλ)∗. The antipode formulas in [F1] give precisely the divided-power shifts, while S(Ti,c,t)=(−1)tTi,t−c−1,t acts on the λ-dual line by (−1)t[⟨λ,hi⟩+t−c−1t]ζ=[−⟨λ,hi⟩+ct]ζ. Thus the dual has the full toral weights. Evaluation f⊗m↦f(m) and coevaluation 1↦∑ama⊗ma are module maps by the two antipode equations; the latter tensor is independent of the chosen basis because it corresponds to the identity linear map. Their composites are the identity by finite dual-basis contraction. Using the bijective S−1 gives right duals and the other triangles, with the same weight check. This proves rigidity.

2.2F2F3step 1.2algebra

These completed identities can actually be evaluated here. For any pair of finite weight sets, Θν can act on Mλ⊗Nμ only if λ+ν and μ−ν are in their respective finite supports. There are finitely many such ν. Iterated products and coproduct actions on any fixed finite tensor product are finite as well: all intermediate weights lie in finite supports, so each successive transfer has only finitely many possible degrees. The same statement holds after an integral generator is applied, since its coproduct is finite. Thus the coefficientwise specialized equalities in step 1.2 become actual equalities of linear maps. In particular Θ−1 is the finite operator obtained from its integral inverse coefficients.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.2step 2.2algebra

The bicharacter supplies the missing toral part of R. Work first with q=zD and the generic phase zD(λ,μ); specialize z to the chosen t only after the following weight identities. For mλ⊗nμ, D(Ei⊗1)D−1=Ei⊗Ki and D(1⊗Ei)D−1=Ki⊗Ei, because (αi,μ)=⟨μ,hi⟩; replacing Ei by Fi reverses the toral exponents. Hence DΔop(Ei)D−1=Δ‾(Ei) and likewise for Fi. For every divided power this can be checked without generic division: the term qabKi−aEi(b)⊗Ei(a) of ΔopEi(r), a+b=r, acquires the bicharacter ratio qb⟨μ,hi⟩+a⟨λ,hi⟩+2ab; the first toral action contributes q−a(⟨λ,hi⟩+2b). Reordering the resulting second factor gives the operator q−abEi(b)⊗KibEi(a), the corresponding term of Δ‾Ei(r). Similarly the term q−abFi(b)⊗Fi(a)Kib acquires the ratio q−b⟨μ,hi⟩−a⟨λ,hi⟩+2ab; including the second toral action leaves qabFi(b)Ki−a⊗Fi(a), exactly the term of Δ‾Fi(r). These computations involve Laurent units only and hold directly at q=ζ for every r. For a toral binomial, Δop(T) and Δ‾(T) have the identical scalar [⟨λ+μ,hi⟩+ct]ζ, so their equality is checked directly; the same holds for Kh. We obtain DΔop(u)=Δ‾(u)D for every full integral generator at the root. Combining this with step 1.2 gives Δ(u)B=BΔop(u) for B=ΘD, hence RΔ(u)=Δop(u)R for R=B−1=D−1Θ−1.

3.2F1step 2.1algebra

Let ρ∨ be the half sum of positive coroots. Then 2ρ∨∈Q∨ and ⟨αi,ρ∨⟩=1. By [F1], S2(Ei(r))=ζ−2rEi(r), S2(Fi(r))=ζ2rFi(r), while S2 fixes the torus and binomials. These are precisely conjugation by g=K−2ρ∨, so S2(x)=gxg−1 for every full generator and hence the full algebra. The double-dual action on the canonical vector-space bidual ȷ(v) is xȷ(v)=ȷ(S2(x)v). It follows that j(v)=ȷ(gv) is a module isomorphism. It is natural; since g is grouplike it is monoidal and is the identity on the unit. It is therefore a pivotal structure in the sense of Pivotal structure.

4.1F3step 2.2step 3.1algebra

Here are both hexagon identities, beyond the tensor-bar cocycle. On three weight factors the bicharacter gives (Δ⊗id⁡)D=D13D23 and (id⁡⊗Δ)D=D12D13. A degree-η summand in positions 13 raises position 1 by η and lowers position 3 by η, so D23(Θη)13D23−1=K−η(2)(Θη)13, while D12(Θη)13D12−1=Kη(2)(Θη)13. Substituting these two exact conjugations into the two factorizations in [F3] yields (Δ⊗id⁡)B=B23B13 and (id⁡⊗Δ)B=B12B13. Inversion gives (Δ⊗id⁡)R=R13R23 and (id⁡⊗Δ)R=R13R12. All sums are finite by step 2.2. By step 3.1, τR is a module isomorphism; naturality follows because module maps preserve weights and commute with each finite algebra coefficient. The two coproduct identities, after the appropriate flips, are exactly the two hexagons, and Θ0=1 gives the unit braidings. Thus c=τR is an actual braiding. The phase identities use χ on full P; they only require tD=ζ and impose no determinant coprimality.

5.1F5step 3.2algebra∎

Finite dual-basis contraction of evaluation and coevaluation gives the two pivotal endomorphism traces Tr⁡(gf) and Tr⁡(g−1f); equivalently the library trace of jM∘f:M→M∗∗ is Tr⁡(gf). We prove their equality for every f, not just dimensions of simple objects. Each generalized eigenspace M(a) of a module endomorphism f is a submodule and weight graded. By [F5] its weight character is Weyl invariant. The longest Weyl element sends 2ρ∨ to −2ρ∨, so pairing reflected weights shows Tr⁡M(a)(g)=Tr⁡M(a)(g−1). On this subspace write f=aid⁡+N with N nilpotent. Because N preserves every weight space, and g and g−1 are scalar on each such space, Tr⁡(gN)=Tr⁡(g−1N)=0. Therefore Tr⁡M(a)(gf)=aTr⁡M(a)(g)=aTr⁡M(a)(g−1)=Tr⁡M(a)(g−1f). Sum over the finite spectrum of f. This proves the strong spherical trace identity, completing all assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources