How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tensor stability and dual stability of root-of-unity tilting modules
Statement
Under Integral Weyl and dual Weyl families at a root of unity, and the inherited Axiom of Choice, the tensor product of two Weyl-filtered modules is Weyl-filtered, and the tensor product of two dual-Weyl-filtered modules is dual-Weyl-filtered. Hence tilting modules are closed under tensor products, ordinary duals and finite direct sums, and contain the tensor unit. This theorem does not presume direct-summand closure or classify indecomposable tiltings.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The selected root datum and module category, with the actual integral Weyl families.
Finite dimensional integral highest modules admit the actual based tensor global basis, not merely an integral bar action (Tensor bars on finite products of based integrable modules).
Every such finite dimensional based module has an integral saturated Weyl filtration surviving specialization (Saturated Weyl filtrations of finite dimensional integral based modules).
The category has exact ordinary duality, a pivotal double-dual isomorphism and the usual exact vector-space tensor product, and its Weyl and dual Weyl families are exchanged by this duality (The full toral-weight root category is braided, rigid and spherical, Integral Weyl and dual Weyl families at a root of unity, Root specialization of integral Weyl lattices and their characters).
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the actual global-basis suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Given: These data and the actual integral lattices.
The finite tensor lattice has the constructed finite based global basis by [F1], with exactly this underlying integral lattice. Apply [F2] before specializing; every section is an integral highest lattice and every quotient is free. Its specialization is therefore a genuine Weyl filtration of with all submodule injections intact. This proof uses an integral filtration and never specializes a generic direct-sum decomposition.
Let have Weyl filtrations. Tensor a filtration of with ; exactness gives sections . Tensor each filtration of with this Weyl factor and use step 1.1 to give each of its sections a Weyl filtration. Pull these finite filtrations back through the successive quotient maps to refine the original filtration. This produces a finite Weyl filtration of . The zero case has the empty filtration.
If are dual-Weyl-filtered, then are Weyl-filtered by [F3]. Step 2.1 makes Weyl-filtered; its dual is dual-Weyl-filtered and is isomorphic to by the dual tensor isomorphism and the pivotal double-dual identifications. Thus dual Weyl filtrations are tensor stable as well. Ordinary duality exchanges the two filtration kinds, so it preserves their intersection. Concatenating filtrations proves finite-sum closure. The trivial one-dimensional module is both and , hence is tilting. These arguments prove exactly the asserted tensor, dual, sum and unit statements.
Depends on
- Integral Weyl and dual Weyl families at a root of unity
- The Axiom of Choice
- Root specialization of integral Weyl lattices and their characters
- Saturated Weyl filtrations of finite dimensional integral based modules
- Tensor bars on finite products of based integrable modules
- The full toral-weight root category is braided, rigid and spherical
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- George Lusztig, Introduction to Quantum Groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Henning Haahr Andersen and Catharina Stroppel, Fusion Rings for Quantum Groups (standard reference, not scraped)