How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Saturated Weyl filtrations of finite dimensional integral based modules
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the integral global-basis suppliers. Let be a finite dimensional integrable based module of finite Cartan type in the exact four-axiom sense of The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module, and let . There is a finite filtration of by -stable submodules, each spanned by a subset of its actual basis, with successive quotients isomorphic to integral highest lattices . Every quotient is finite free. Specializing at any nonzero complex parameter therefore gives an actual Weyl filtration, with all injections retained. This is an integral filtration statement, not a generic decomposition assertion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The above finite dimensional based module and its four structures.
A based module has a homogeneous field basis, -stable integral basis lattice, compatible involution fixing that basis, and a crystal lattice whose residue basis consists of the basis residues. Subobjects spanned by basis subsets and their complementary quotients inherit these structures (The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module).
The generic highest module at a dominant label is simple, integrable and universal, with actual homogeneous global -basis and integral based highest quotient (The integrable quantum highest weight module exists and is unique, The based quotient: projection of the lower global basis to a highest weight module).
Crystal operators have unique string expansions, preserve the crystal lattice, map residue basis to residue basis or zero, and inverse operators recover preceding nonzero crystal positions; every highest-module global vector is congruent modulo to a sequence of lowering crystal operators applied to its highest vector (Uniqueness of the -string decomposition of an integrable module, The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases). Here the local parameter is the library's parameter at zero.
The Axiom of Choice is used only through these global-basis and crystal suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Given: These data. Denote the crystal local ring by and its lattice by .
If is bar fixed and belongs to for , then ; if it belongs to , then . Indeed write with . Being in means each coefficient is regular at zero, so it lies in ; being bar fixed means , so each such polynomial is constant. Its residue therefore determines the entire coefficient. This proves both assertions without a positivity or norm assumption.
Choose a maximal label in the finite weight support of . Every vector of its basis subset is highest. Generic rank-one integrability makes dominant, and [F2] gives for each an injective homomorphism carrying its highest vector to . Its integral lattice maps into because it is generated by integral divided powers; its bar commutes with the target bar since both commute with the action and fix the highest vector. The map also commutes with all crystal operators by the unique string decomposition, and therefore maps the source crystal lattice into . Thus every source global vector maps to an integral bar-fixed vector congruent either to a member of or to zero modulo . Step 1.1 and field injectivity show that every image is a member of , and never zero.
The basis images for distinct are disjoint. Otherwise a common image basis vector is congruent to a nonzero crystal lowering path from each of . Apply the reversed raising path from to that common vector; it recovers in the residue crystal. Because commutes with crystal operators, this produces a source crystal vector in at weight whose image has residue . The source highest-weight space has basis the highest vector alone, hence its image residue is , forcing . Consequently the direct sum of the identifies the direct sum of actual integral highest lattices with the basis-subset lattice spanned by their disjoint images. This lattice is saturated, -stable and has a free complementary basis quotient. No equality of arbitrary tensor-product Hom ranks before and after specialization has been used.
Remove that basis-subset submodule and apply [F1] to its based quotient. Its dimension is strictly smaller, and induction on the finite dimension constructs a finite filtration with sections equal to direct sums of integral highest lattices; refine each such section by its finitely many copies. The initial zero module has the empty filtration. In every short exact sequence of this filtration the quotient is free as an -module, so choosing its displayed basis gives an -linear splitting and tensoring with any specialized field preserves injectivity as well as surjectivity. The specialized sections are exactly the root Weyl lattices by definition. This proves the complete assertion, with Choice confined to [F4].
Depends on
- The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module
- The Axiom of Choice
- The based quotient: projection of the lower global basis to a highest weight module
- The integrable quantum highest weight module exists and is unique
- The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases
- Uniqueness of the $i$-string decomposition of an integrable module
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- George Lusztig, Introduction to Quantum Groups (standard reference, not scraped)