Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The integral residue lattices LA(∞) and LA(λ)

Definition

Let A=Z[q,q−1], with rational discrete valuation rings A0 at q=0 and A∞ at q=∞. Put MA=UA− or VA(λ)=UA−vλ, L=L(∞) or L(λ), and L−=ψ(L), the bar lattice, as in The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module.

The integral residue lattice is LZ:=MA∩L, a Z[q]-module, and its bar lattice is LZ−:=MA∩L−, a Z[q−1]-module. The balanced intersection is EZ:=MA∩L∩L−, a Z-module. Since q−1MA=MA, one has MA∩qL=qLZ; consequently the residue map LZ/qLZ→L/qL is injective and is Z-linear. Its image is an integral subgroup of the rational crystal space, not the entire Q-space. No Laurent-A-linearity is asserted on the residue lattice or on the residue map.

The field projection πλ:Uq−→V(λ), πλ(P)=Pvλ, restricts to an A-linear surjection UA−→VA(λ) (The Lusztig divided-power integral form UA), and it sends LZ(∞) into LZ(λ) by the already-proved grand-loop lattice projection (The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases). The module VA(λ) is UA-stable: the divided-power and toral reordering identities of Divided-power multiplication, toral binomials and the Ei(a)Fi(b) reordering identity reduce the action on vλ to negative divided powers and Gaussian scalars in A, with all positive generators killing the highest vector except through the unit, and the residue compatibility of the projection is Projection from L(∞) to L(λ) and its compatibility with the Kashiwara operators. No global freeness, residue spanning or balancedness is assumed here. The integral residue subgroup for the negative half is proved below to be ZB(∞); the module subgroup ZB(λ) is a consequence of globalization.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources