How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The integral residue lattices and
Definition
Let , with rational discrete valuation rings at and at . Put or , or , and , the bar lattice, as in The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module.
The integral residue lattice is , a -module, and its bar lattice is , a -module. The balanced intersection is , a -module. Since , one has ; consequently the residue map is injective and is -linear. Its image is an integral subgroup of the rational crystal space, not the entire -space. No Laurent--linearity is asserted on the residue lattice or on the residue map.
The field projection , , restricts to an -linear surjection (The Lusztig divided-power integral form ), and it sends into by the already-proved grand-loop lattice projection (The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases). The module is -stable: the divided-power and toral reordering identities of Divided-power multiplication, toral binomials and the reordering identity reduce the action on to negative divided powers and Gaussian scalars in , with all positive generators killing the highest vector except through the unit, and the residue compatibility of the projection is Projection from to and its compatibility with the Kashiwara operators. No global freeness, residue spanning or balancedness is assumed here. The integral residue subgroup for the negative half is proved below to be ; the module subgroup is a consequence of globalization.
Depends on
- The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module
- The Lusztig divided-power integral form $U_A$
- The Kashiwara lattices $\mathcal L(\lambda)$ and $\mathcal L(\infty)$ and their generating sets
- The integrable quantum highest weight module exists and is unique
- The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases
- Divided-power multiplication, toral binomials and the $E_i^{(a)}F_i^{(b)}$ reordering identity
- Projection from $\mathcal L(\infty)$ to $\mathcal L(\lambda)$ and its compatibility with the Kashiwara operators
Used by
- Integral residues of the negative half: freeness, the crystal basis and the form characterization Lemma
- Integrality of the string decomposition and the divided-power string ideals Lemma
- The string-ideal triples are balanced: the induction step (Kashiwara 7.4.1 / JKK 10.4) Lemma
- The based quotient: projection of the lower global basis to a highest weight module Theorem
- The cyclotomic projective K₀ is the integral highest-weight module Theorem
- The highest weight and negative half integral crystal triples are balanced Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Masaki Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras, Duke Mathematical Journal 63 (1991), 465–516 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kyeonghoon Jeong, Seok-Jin Kang and Masaki Kashiwara, Crystal Bases for Quantum Generalized Kac-Moody Algebras, arXiv:math/0305390 (standard reference, not scraped)