Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Divided-power multiplication, toral binomials and the Ei(a)Fi(b) reordering identity

Statement

Let i∈I and let Ti,c,t be the toral quantum binomials of The Lusztig divided-power integral form UA (i∈I, c∈Z, t≥0, Ti,c,0=1), inside the Drinfeld–Jimbo algebra Uq(g) of The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations with UA and its parts UA−,UA0,UA+ as in that definition. Write E=Ei, F=Fi, E(a)=Ei(a), F(b)=Fi(b) for the divided powers of Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi and put q=qi inside the displayed formulas.

(i) Divided-power multiplication. For all a,b≥0, E(a)E(b)=(a+ba)iE(a+b),F(a)F(b)=(a+ba)iF(a+b).

(ii) Toral recursion and commutation. For t≥1, Ti,c,t=Kiqi c−t+1−Ki−1qi −c+t−1qi t−qi −t Ti,c,t−1. Each Ti,c,t is a Laurent polynomial in Ki±1 with coefficients in Q(q); the toral elements commute with one another and with all Kh. For all i,j and all m∈Z one has Ki mTj,c,t=Tj,c,tKi m if i≠j, while EiTi,c,t=Ti,c−2,tEi, EjTi,c,t=Ti,c−aij,tEj, FiTi,c,t=Ti,c+2,tFi, FjTi,c,t=Ti,c+aij,tFj for all j. In particular EiTi,c,t∈UA0Ei, FiTi,c,t∈UA0Fi, Ti,c,tEi=EiTi,c+2,t∈EiUA0 and Ti,c,tFi=FiTi,c−2,t∈FiUA0: the toral factor can be moved to the middle at the cost of a shift of the binomial index.

(iii) Reordering identity. For all a,b≥0, Ei(a)Fi(b)=∑t=0min⁡(a,b)Fi(b−t) Ti, 2t−a−b, t Ei(a−t), with every coefficient a toral quantum binomial in UA0. In particular EiFi−FiEi=Ti,0,1 and Ei(a)Fi(a)=∑t=0aFi(a−t)Ti,2t−2a,tEi(a−t). For i≠j, Ei(a) and Fj(b) commute; the same-half divided powers Ei(a),Ej(b) (and likewise Fi(a),Fj(b)) commute whenever aij=0, and for aij≠0 no commutation is asserted.

(iv) Triangular spanning. Every element of UA is an A-linear combination of products b−u b+ with b−∈UA−, u∈UA0 and b+∈UA+; equivalently UA=UA−UA0UA+ as an A-module. No independence of the spanning family is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Cartan datum, the algebra Uq(g), the toral binomials Ti,c,t, and the divided powers x(m)=xm/[m]i!.

[F1]

x(a)x(b)=xa+b[a]i![b]i!=(a+ba)ix(a+b), because (a+ba)i=[a+b]i![a]i![b]i! and [m]i!≠0 for all m (Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi).

[F2]

The defining relations: EiFi−FiEi=(Ki−Ki−1)/(qi−qi−1); EiFj=FjEi for i≠j; EiEj−EjEi=0=FiFj−FjFi when aij=0; and the general same-half relations are the quantum Serre relations (The Drinfeld-Jimbo quantized enveloping algebra by generators and relations).

[F3]

Toral conjugation and shifts: KiEjKi−1=qi aijEj and KiFjKi−1=qi −aijFj, so for every Laurent polynomial f(Ki±1) one has Ejf(Ki±1)=f(qi −aijKi±1)Ej and Fjf(Ki±1)=f(qi aijKi±1)Fj (Positive, negative and toral quantum subalgebras and their root gradings).

[F4]

The published rank-one formula: for b≥1, EiFi(b)=Fi(b)Ei+Fi(b−1)Ti,1−b,1, equivalently EiFi(b)=Fi(b)Ei+Fi(b−1)1qib−qi−b∑s=0b−1(qi−2sKi−qi2sKi−1), and for b=0 one has EiFi(0)=Ei=Fi(0)Ei (Divided-power commutation and the simple Uqi(sl2) string modules (ii) and The Lusztig divided-power integral form UA for the identification of the coefficient with Ti,1−b,1).

[F5]

For use in this proof, extend the quantum integer to every m∈Z by [m]i:=(qim−qi−m)/(qi−qi−1), agreeing with Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi for m≥0 and giving [−m]i=−[m]i. Direct expansion of the numerators gives qi−n(qim−qi−m)+qim(qin−qi−n)=qim+n−qi−m−n; replacing qi by qi−1 gives the other version. Thus [m+n]i=qi−n[m]i+qim[n]i=qin[m]i+qi−m[n]i for all integers m,n, without extending factorials or Gaussian binomials to negative indices.

[F6]

UA is the A-algebra generated by the Ei(r),Fi(r),Kh±1,Ti,c,t; its elements are finite A-linear combinations of finite products of these generators, and Ei(r)∈UA+[rαi], Fi(r)∈UA−[−rαi], Kh±1,Ti,c,t∈UA0[0] (The Lusztig divided-power integral form UA).

Verification

technique · the divided-power identities are factorial arithmetic; the toral identities are computed by conjugating $K_i$ through $E_j,F_j$; the reordering identity is an induction on $a$ whose induction step is the toral product identity proved in step 1.2; the triangular spanning is a terminating rewriting using the reordering identity
1.1givenF1algebra

Part (i): by [F1], E(a)E(b)=Ea+b/([a]i![b]i!)=(a+ba)iEa+b/[a+b]i!=(a+ba)iE(a+b) and likewise for F.

1.2givenF4F5algebra

Auxiliary product identity. Fix integers a,b and t≥1, put c:=2t−a−b−2 and let G(x,t):=∏s=1t(Kiqix−s+1−Ki−1qi−x+s−1), so that Ti,x,t=G(x,t)/D(t) with D(t)=∏s=1t(qis−qi−s); we prove [a+1]iTi,c+1,t=[a−t+1]iTi,c,t+Ti,t−b,1Ti,c,t−1. Factoring G(x,t)=qi−t(t−1)/2∏s=1t(Kiqix−Ki−1qi2s−2−x) and putting u:=Kiqic+1, so that Kiqix=uqix−c−1 and Ki−1qiy=u−1qiy+c+1, the relevant factors become G(c+1,t)=qi−t(t−1)/2(u−u−1)W, G(c,t)=qi−t(t−1)/2qi−tW(u−qi2tu−1), G(c,t−1)=qi−(t−1)(t−2)/2qi−(t−1)W and G(t−b,1)=uqia−t+1−u−1qi−a+t−1, where W:=∏s=1t−1(u−qi2su−1). Multiplying the target identity by D(t)=D(t−1)(qit−qi−t), using D(t)/(D(t−1))=[t]i(qi−qi−1) and qit−qi−t=[t]i(qi−qi−1), and factoring out the common factor qi−t(t−1)/2W, the two sides become [a+1]i(u−u−1) and [a−t+1]iqi−t(u−qi2tu−1)+[t]i(uqia−t+1−u−1qi−a+t−1); comparing the coefficients of u and u−1 gives the identities [a+1]i=qi−t[a−t+1]i+qia−t+1[t]i and [a+1]i=qit[a−t+1]i+qi−a+t−1[t]i, both instances of [F5] with (m,n)=(a−t+1,t).

2.1step 1.1F3algebra

Part (ii): unrolling the product definition, Ti,c,t=∏s=1tKiqic−s+1−Ki−1qi−c+s−1qis−qi−s equals the s=t factor times Ti,c,t−1; since both are Laurent polynomials in Ki±1 (The Lusztig divided-power integral form UA, Verification) they commute and the recursion follows. The commutativity statements are those of that step. For the shifts, [F3] gives Ejf(Ki±1)=f(qi−aijKi±1)Ej and Fjf(Ki±1)=f(qiaijKi±1)Fj; applying this to the t-fold product f=Ti,c,t, the first factor of Ti,c,t is multiplied by qi−aij (first term) and qiaij (second term), which is the same as replacing c by c−aij; hence EjTi,c,t=Ti,c−aij,tEj (for j=i, aii=2), and likewise FjTi,c,t=Ti,c+aij,tFj. Rewriting gives Ti,c,tEj=EjTi,c+aij,t and Ti,c,tFj=FjTi,c−aij,t.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F1F4algebra

Reordering by induction on a for fixed b. At a=0 the identity is Fi(b)=Fi(b)Ti,−b,0Ei(0). Multiply the formula for a on the left by Ei/[a+1]i. For a target index 1≤t≤min⁡(a+1,b) put c=2t−a−b−2. The no-contraction term from index t contributes [a−t+1]iTi,c,t to the coefficient of Fi(b−t)Ei(a+1−t), after shifting Ei through the toral factor. The contraction term from index t−1 contributes Ti,t−b,1Ti,c,t−1 by [F4]. Their sum is [a+1]iTi,c+1,t by step 1.2, so division by the nonzero [a+1]i gives the target coefficient. When t=a+1 the absent no-contraction term is represented by [0]i=0; the t=0 term is just Fi(b)Ei(a+1). A contraction from t=b is absent because Fi(0)=1, so no target exceeds b. These account for every term and prove the induction, including the stated special cases.

3.2step 2.1F2algebra

The remaining clauses of (iii): for i≠j the relation EiFj=FjEi of [F2] gives Ei(a)Fj(b)=Fj(b)Ei(a) after dividing by the nonzero factorials [F1]; if aij=0 then EiEj=EjEi and FiFj=FjFi by [F2], hence Ei(a)Ej(b)=Ej(b)Ei(a) and Fi(a)Fj(b)=Fj(b)Fi(a) for all a,b. No commutation is asserted when aij≠0, where the quantum Serre relation is the only comparison used later.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2F3F6construct∎

Part (iv): every element of UA is a finite A-linear combination of finite products of generators by [F6]. Move every Kh±1 and every Tj,c,t to the middle: Kh commutes with the toral generators and crosses Ej,Fj at the cost of the scalar q∓⟨αj,h⟩∈A by [F3]; Tj,c,t crosses Ei,Fi at the cost of an index shift by step 2.1. These operations do not change the relative order of the positive and negative generators, so after finitely many of them we obtain a finite sum of terms b−u b+ with u∈UA0 and b± products of divided powers of a single sign, except that a product may still contain an E-factor to the left of an F-factor. Define the measure of such a product as the pair (total height h = sum of the exponents of all its divided powers, number ι of ordered pairs (positive factor, negative factor) in which the positive factor precedes the negative one), ordered lexicographically. An adjacent sign inversion, after moving toral factors aside, has the form Ei(a)Fj(b) with a,b≥1. If i≠j, step 3.2 swaps the factors, keeping h and decreasing ι. If i=j, step 3.1 rewrites it as ∑t=0min⁡(a,b)Fi(b−t)Ti,2t−a−b,tEi(a−t): the terms with t≥1 strictly decrease h, while the t=0 term Fi(b)Ti,−a−b,0Ei(a) keeps h but strictly decreases ι (that inversion disappears and no other inversion is created, as toral factors are ignored by ι). By induction on (h,ι) the rewriting terminates, producing the asserted span by triangular products in UA−UA0UA+.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources