Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bar invariance, congruence and uniqueness of the lower global basis

Statement

For the divided-power integral form UA− of The Lusztig divided-power integral form UA and for every dominant λ, let MA be UA− or VA(λ)=UA−vλ, let L be L(∞) or L(λ) with bar lattice L−=ψ(L), and let B be B(∞) or B(λ). Then there is a unique lower global family G(B)⊆MA∩L∩L− with the property that the residue class of G(b) in (MA∩L)/(MA∩qL) is b for every b∈B, namely the family of The lower global basis of Uq− and of a highest weight module. It is bar invariant, a genuine A=Z[q,q−1] basis of MA, and a basis of both rational chart lattices L and L− over A0 and A∞; its Z-span is the simultaneous balanced intersection MA∩L∩L− and its field span is the whole module. It is adapted to every divided string-image ideal in the exact sense of the integral balanced theorem, and the same family is obtained with residue b over either chart. No word family is assumed to be a basis, no unitriangular characterization is used, and no lower lattice self-duality is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The balanced triple (MA,L,L−) over A0,A∞ of Balanced triples over the two charts of P1 and the globalization map, the string-image ideals I(i,n)A,J(i,n)A of Integrality of the string decomposition and the divided-power string ideals, the lower global definition of The lower global basis of Uq− and of a highest weight module, and the bar involution ψ with its stability of UA− and the divided-power form (The bar involution and the contravariant anti-involution preserve UA).

[F1]

Integral balanced theorem (The highest weight and negative half integral crystal triples are balanced): the triples (UA−,L(∞),ψ(L(∞))) and (VA(λ),L(λ),ψ(L(λ))) are integrally balanced componentwise; the balanced Z-intersection maps isomorphically onto ZB, after rational extension onto the full rational crystal space; there are bar-invariant global lifts G(b) forming an A-basis of MA, spanning L over A0 and L− over A∞, adapted to every string-image ideal I(i,n)A and J(i,n)A with the displayed free decompositions.

[F2]

Balancedness and its kernel (Balanced triples over the two charts of P1 and the globalization map): the canonical map EZ=MA∩L∩L−→(MA∩L)/(MA∩qL) is an isomorphism exactly when the triple is balanced, so in the balanced case an element of EZ lies in MA∩qL only if it is 0.

[F3]

Bar transport (The bar involution and the contravariant anti-involution preserve UA, The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module): ψ preserves UA−, commutes with the projection πλ, and exchanges L and L−, so the balanced intersection EZ is stable under ψ and ψ transports the zero-chart residue map to the infinity-chart residue map; the bar-fixed global lifts and their corresponding residue labels are supplied by [F1], not by an action of q↦q−1 on the zero-chart quotient.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3

Existence. Apply [F1] degree by degree, and note that the residue target is the free Z-span of B in each finite root or label component. The lift G(b) of residue b exists in EZ, is bar invariant by [F1], and the direct sums over degrees give a family G(B) with the asserted spanning properties over A, A0 and A∞; adaptedness to the string ideals is the corresponding clause of [F1].

2.1F2step 1.1

Uniqueness. Let g,h∈MA∩L∩L− have the same residue class in (MA∩L)/(MA∩qL). Then g−h∈EZ∩qL lies in the kernel of the canonical map of [F2], which is injective in the balanced case; hence g=h. Applied to g=G(b) and an arbitrary lift of b, this is exactly the uniqueness used by later consumers, and it identifies the family defined over either chart.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give existence, the residue normalization, bar invariance, the two chart-basis assertions, the balanced-intersection and field-span descriptions and uniqueness; no word family, unitriangular condition or lower self-duality enters, since the construction is the inverse of the integral globalization map of [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources