Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Prime-power specializations of the integral quantum half have a nondegenerate Green form

Statement

Assume the inherited Axiom of Choice of the global-basis suppliers. Let I be a finite symmetric Cartan datum with symmetrizers di=1; its generalized Cartan matrix need not be of finite type. Write A=Z[t,t−1], and let UA− denote the divided-power integral half inside the generic quantum Serre algebra over Q(t). Let Q=pa>1 be a prime power, let ν=Q>1, and set K=Q(ν) and H±=K⊗A,t↦ν±1UA−.

The normalized Kashiwara form Bt specializes to a nondegenerate symmetric form on every finite homogeneous component of both H+ and H−. Their component dimensions are the classical PBW ranks. On H− the primitive-generator coproduct has tensor multiplication (x⊗y)(x′⊗y′)=ν(deg⁡y,deg⁡x′)xx′⊗yy′. The rescaled homogeneous form G(x,y)=(Q−1)−ht⁡αBν−1(x,y) for x,y∈H−[−α], zero in different degrees, has G(Fi,Fj)=δij/(Q−1) and both braided Hopf adjunctions. Thus it has exactly the generator values and symmetric tensor twist of the Green pairing.

This statement concerns the specialization of the integral half. It does not identify that algebra with the algebra presented at the numerical parameter by the quantum Serre relations alone.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite symmetric Cartan datum, Q,ν,K, and the integral half and normalized generic half form Bt.

[F1]

The integral half has, in each finite root degree, a finite A-basis g1,…,gN of bar-fixed lower global elements, and its rank is the classical PBW rank (Integral triangular decomposition and freeness of the Lusztig form, Bar invariance, congruence and uniqueness of the lower global basis).

[F2]

In that basis the Gram matrix of Bt is regular at t=0 and congruent to the identity modulo t (Crystal lattice polarizations are perfect at q=0). All its entries lie in Z[t,t−1,Dm(t)−1:m≥1], where Dm(t)=∏r=1m(1+t2+⋯+t2(r−1)); this is the exact divided-power denominator bound of The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral(iv).

[F3]

The form is symmetric and homogeneous and satisfies both primitive braided Hopf adjunctions with tensor twist t−(deg⁡y,deg⁡x′) and generator value 1; on words its value is the sum over matching permutations π of t−∑a<b,π(a)>π(b)(αia,αib) (The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral, proof steps 1.1–2.1; Generic quantum Serre halves have classical PBW ranks and a nondegenerate Hopf pairing).

[F4]

The integral bar fixes divided powers and sends t to t−1 (The bar involution and the contravariant anti-involution preserve UA). Gaussian-binomial coproduct coefficients are Laurent integral (The quantum Pascal recurrences, the Gauss product formula and Gaussian integrality).

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

The minimal polynomial of ν is X−ν∈Z[X] if Q is a square, and X2−Q otherwise. In either case it is monic with constant term of absolute value greater than 1. If an integer polynomial P with P(0)=1 vanished at ν, division by the monic minimal polynomial would express P as its product with an integer polynomial: perform monic polynomial division in Z[X], and the remainder must be zero because it has smaller degree and vanishes at ν. Comparing constant terms would make an integer of absolute value greater than 1 divide 1, a contradiction. Consequently no such P vanishes at ν.

1.2F1F4algebra

Reversal R(Fi1⋯Fin)=Fin⋯Fi1 preserves the generic Serre ideal: reversing a Serre polynomial interchanges its summand indexed by r with the summand indexed by 1−aij−r, multiplying the whole polynomial by (−1)1−aij. It therefore defines an involutive anti-automorphism of the generic half, and preserves UA− since it reverses products of divided powers. Its matrix T(t) in the global basis has entries in A and inverse itself. In particular T(ν) is invertible.

1.3F3F4algebra

The primitive braided coproduct preserves UA−: on a divided power the quantum binomial formula gives r(Fi(n))=∑r+s=nt−rsFi(r)⊗Fi(s), and the divided powers generate the integral half. Thus its coassociativity and counit specialize from the generic identities, as do both form adjunctions of [F3], because their coefficients lie in the localization at nonzero Gaussian factorials. At t=ν−1 the tensor scalar is ν(deg⁡y,deg⁡x′). The specialized algebra remains connected and root graded, so the usual height recursion S(x)=−x−∑S(x′)x′′ for the reduced coproduct gives its antipode: the two convolution recursions give left and right inverses, and associativity makes them equal.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Fix a root degree and its global basis in [F1]. By [F2], the determinant Δ(t) of its Gram matrix belongs to the indicated localization, is regular at zero and has Δ(0)=1. Clear its finitely many Gaussian-factorial denominators, obtaining Δ(t)=L(t)/D(t) with L∈Z[t,t−1] and D∈Z[t] with D(0)=1. Since Δ is regular at zero, L=ΔD has no negative Laurent powers, so in fact L∈Z[t] and L(0)=1. Each Dm(ν) is a product of positive geometric sums and is nonzero; step 1.1 gives L(ν)≠0. Hence the specialized Gram determinant is nonzero. The specialized global family is a basis because it was an A-basis. Thus Bν is nondegenerate, and its component dimension is the rank in [F1].

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1step 1.2algebra

For α=∑iniαi put cα=((α,α)−∑ini(αi,αi))/2, the integer sum of the pairings over all unordered pairs of letter positions in any word of degree −α. Reversal of the first word complements the inversion set in the matching-permutation formula of [F3]; the color form is symmetric, so Bt−1(u,v)=tcαBt(Ru,v) for equal-degree words. For arbitrary generic elements, coefficient inversion consequently gives Bt(x,y)‾=tcαBt(Rxˉ,yˉ). The global basis is bar fixed by [F1]. Therefore its Gram matrix M satisfies M(t−1)=tcαT(t)TM(t). Evaluating at t=ν and using steps 1.2 and 2.1 proves that M(ν−1) is invertible. Its entries are evaluable since all Gaussian-factorial denominators are positive at ν−1. This proves nondegeneracy on H−, with the same ranks from [F1].

4.1F3step 2.1step 3.1step 1.3algebra∎

On a homogeneous degree −α multiply the form by (Q−1)−ht⁡α. In a nonzero summand of either adjunction the factor degrees add to α, and heights add; hence the scaling factors multiply and both adjunctions remain true. Its simple-generator values are δij/(Q−1) by [F3], and its nondegeneracy follows from step 3.1 since its scaling factors are nonzero. Together with steps 1.1–3.1 this proves every assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources