How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Crystal lattice polarizations are perfect at
Statement
For the highest-module and negative-half Kashiwara lattices, their respective normalized polarizations take values in and their crystal residue bases are orthonormal. On every finite label or root component the Gram determinant is a unit of , the -pairing is perfect and . Moreover inside the field scalar extension of the lattice. These are consequences after the grand loop, not prerequisites for it. Only the field-half supplier's inherited AC hypothesis is retained.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A dominant integral weight , the lattices and with their residue bases from the grand loop, and the normalized module -contravariant form of Cartan projection constructs the Verma contravariant form and identifies its radical and the normalized -adjoint half form of The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral.
Grand loop: the pairs and are crystal bases with the partial-inverse and projection clauses C, J, L, N, O and the module/lattice pairing properties; the module pairing is -valued and satisfies on the module lattices (The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases).
The forms: the module form on each finite-dimensional weight space is nondegenerate, the half form is symmetric nondegenerate and -valued on the word lattice, with the exact denominator bound on the divided lattice. Step 8.1 of The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases derives the large-weight comparison of the half and module pairings has constant term for ; the operator of the source's Lemma 7.25 is the identity because (The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral, Cartan projection constructs the Verma contravariant form and identifies its radical).
Finite linear algebra over : a matrix congruent to the identity modulo has determinant a unit of and is invertible; over the field the same matrix is invertible, and the inverse pairing matrix identifies the dual lattice with the lattice (Crystal lattices, crystal bases and their crystals, The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Residue orthonormality. Induct on . For residues choose with ; then by clause C(r) and J(r), so the adjunction of [F1] gives . If this is ; otherwise lies at lower height and, by the lower-height orthonormality and the injectivity of on the surviving string positions, the pairing is . The top vector has norm , and since all the operator of [F2] is the identity, so no norm larger than occurs.
Perfection and self-duality. By step 1.1 the Gram matrix of the finite component in the residue basis is congruent to the identity modulo ; by [F3] its determinant is a unit of and the matrix is invertible, so the pairing on the finite component is perfect and the dual lattice with respect to the field form equals the lattice itself: .
The negative half. For use the corrected degree/colour comparison of [F2] with a sufficiently large regularised dominant weight: is a lattice isomorphism on the component and a bijection on its crystal residue sets, and ; hence the Gram residue of the half lattice is the identity as well, and the same finite-matrix argument gives -valuedness, perfection and on each finite component.
The norm criterion. Suppose but has a pole in the lattice. Choose the minimal with and let be its residue. In the orthonormal residue basis of step 1.1, is a sum of squares of rational coordinates, hence a positive rational; on the other hand has residue , a contradiction. Therefore inside the field scalar extension.
Choice. The only choice used is the inherited hypothesis of the negative-half field form, already declared in [F2]; the finite Gram computations and the norm criterion use no further choice.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Crystal lattices, crystal bases and their crystals
- The Kashiwara lattices $\mathcal L(\lambda)$ and $\mathcal L(\infty)$ and their generating sets
- The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases
- The negative-half bilinear form is symmetric, nondegenerate and integral
- Cartan projection constructs the Verma contravariant form and identifies its radical
Used by
- The upper (form-dual) global basis and the required perfectness of the integral pairing Definition
- Divided-power integrality of the quasi-R action on based lattices Lemma
- Integral residues of the negative half: freeness, the crystal basis and the form characterization Lemma
- Reversal preserves the negative-half integral and crystal lattices Lemma
- Lusztig's canonical basis and Kashiwara's lower global basis agree in symmetric finite ADE type Theorem
- Self-dual indecomposable KLR projectives give the lower global basis (symmetric type) Theorem
- Upper and lower global bases are dual and crystal compatible Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kyeonghoon Jeong, Seok-Jin Kang and Masaki Kashiwara, Crystal Bases for Quantum Generalized Kac-Moody Algebras, arXiv:math/0305390 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Masaki Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991), no. 2, 465-516 (standard reference, not scraped)