How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Shapley effects for dependent inputs
Definition
Assume AC. On a probability space , let be finite and let be any jointly distributed finite family of random elements. Let , and put . For , set , with , and If , let be the set of all permutations of , and let contain the indices occurring before in . The Shapley effect of coordinate under this convention is If , the normalized effects are undefined. This definition is for dependent inputs as well as independent ones; the independent Sobol ANOVA components are not used to define .
Depends on
Used by
- Exact finite-permutation Shapley effects Algorithm
- Monte Carlo permutation estimator for Shapley effects Algorithm
- Perfectly correlated inputs share a Shapley effect Example
- Dependent-input Shapley effects are nonnegative and sum to one Theorem
- Monte Carlo permutation Shapley effects have a joint CLT Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eunhye Song, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum, Shapley Effects for Global Sensitivity Analysis: Theory and Computation, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)