How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Differentiable stationary stochastic policies and score vectors
Definition
Let a finite Markov decision process have nonempty finite state set and finite nonempty action set at each state. Let be open, with . A differentiable stationary policy family on is a family of probabilities , indexed by , , and , such that , each map is totally differentiable, and for each there is a fixed nonempty support with for every and , while for every and . The score vector at a supported state-action pair is
where the gradient is the Euclidean vector of partial derivatives. The fixed-support condition makes this logarithm defined throughout on every action that can be sampled.
Definition references
Total differentiability is the linear first-order approximation with a remainder of smaller order.
The gradient of a scalar-valued map is the vector of its coordinate partial derivatives.
The total derivative of a composition is the composition of the total derivatives.
The logarithm is differentiable at positive arguments with derivative equal to their reciprocal.
Depends on
- Finite Markov decision process with joint reward-transition law
- The total (Fréchet) derivative $Df(a)$ as the linear first-order approximation with $o(\|h\|_2)$ remainder
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
- The chain rule for total derivatives: $D(g\circ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))\circ Df(a)$
- The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t
Used by
- Episodic REINFORCE with a fixed state baseline Algorithm
- Episodic REINFORCE with a frozen episode policy Algorithm
- Finite-budget group-relative policy update Algorithm
- One-step episodic actor–critic with a bootstrapped critic Algorithm
- Sample-based constrained policy optimization update Algorithm
- Omitting the start-time discount changes the policy gradient Counterexample
- Finite truncated response spaces, correctness predicates, and verifiers Definition
- A bootstrapped critic can bias the first actor update Example
- A state baseline can eliminate this estimator's variance Example
- One-step Bernoulli REINFORCE has the exact expected gradient Example
- A policy score has zero conditional mean before the action Lemma
- A state-dependent action-independent baseline preserves the gradient mean Lemma
- Finite-response score mean and reward-gradient identities Lemma
- Discounted episodic policy gradients from trajectory likelihoods Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Sutton and Andrew G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, second-edition draft (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald J. Williams, Simple Statistical Gradient-Following Algorithms for Connectionist Reinforcement Learning, Machine Learning 8 (1992) (standard reference, not scraped)