Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A state-dependent action-independent baseline preserves the gradient mean

Statement

Assume the hypotheses of the discounted episodic policy-gradient theorem at a fixed parameter θ0, including the Axiom of Choice, common support, almost-sure finite termination, dominated trajectory differentiation, and the stated integrability of discounted return-score products. Let b:S→R be any fixed finite-valued function of the state, chosen independently of the actions in the episode. Then

Eθ0 ⁣[∑t=0T−1γt(Gt−b(St))∇θlog⁡πθ0(At∣St)]=∇θJ(θ0).

The baseline is action-independent conditional on the state and past. This identity says that subtracting it preserves the expected update; it does not say that every baseline reduces variance.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and notation of Discounted episodic policy gradients from trajectory likelihoods, its Axiom of Choice premise, and a fixed finite-valued state function b.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; the policy trajectory law and conditional-expectation supplier use this axiom.

[F1]

Discounted episodic policy gradients from trajectory likelihoods: under its stated trajectory-differentiation and integrability assumptions, E[∑t<TγtGtψt]=∇J(θ0).

[F2]

A policy score has zero conditional mean before the action: for the pre-action history Ht, E[ψt∣Ht]=0 almost surely.

[F3]

Finite Markov decision process with joint reward-transition law and Differentiable stationary stochastic policies and score vectors: the state and action sets are finite, and at fixed θ0 every score vector on the common support is finite; hence the finitely many score vectors are bounded.

[F4]

Episodic returns, temporal-difference errors, and policy support: 0≤γ<1, episodes terminate almost surely, and Gt is the discounted return from time t.

[F5]

Taking out what is known: an integrable variable measurable with respect to Ht can be taken outside conditional expectation when its product is integrable.

[F7]

Dominated convergence: almost-sure convergence under a single integrable majorant permits convergence of expectations.

Proof

Given: The Statement hypotheses, with ψt=∇θlog⁡πθ0(At∣St) for t<T.

1.1givenA1F2F3F5F6algebra

Because S is finite, b is bounded; because the state-action support is finite, [F3] gives Cψ:=max⁡s,a∈B(s)∥ψθ0(s,a)∥2<∞. For every episode, [F6] bounds the baseline-score sum by ∑t<Tγt∣b(St)∣∥ψt∥2≤∥b∥∞Cψ/(1−γ). For each fixed t, 1{t<T}b(St) is Ht-measurable, so [F2] and [F5] give E[γt1{t<T}b(St)ψt]=0.

2.1step 1.1F4F7

The partial baseline-score sums converge almost surely to the full sum because T<∞ almost surely, and the bound in step 1.1 is an integrable constant majorant. By [F7], the expectation of the full baseline-score sum is the limit of its finite partial-sum expectations, each zero by step 1.1; hence E[∑t<Tγtb(St)ψt]=0.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

Subtracting the zero vector in step 2.1 from the policy-gradient expectation in [F1] gives the displayed identity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources