Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Efficient score and efficient information

Definition

Let θ∈Rp, p≥1 finite, be a parameter of interest at a law P. Assume its score vector Sθ=(Sθ,1,…,Sθ,p)T has components in L02(P); under a dominated differentiable parametric submodel these are the coordinate log-density scores of Score and Fisher information. Let Tη⊆L02(P) be the closed nuisance tangent space of Nuisance tangent space. The ambient L02(P) is as in Mean-zero square-integrable functions. The score-density convention uses the Axiom of Choice, while Hilbert projection uses Countable Choice; both dependencies are retained separately.

The Hilbert decomposition Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace defines ΠTηf as the unique g∈Tη with f−g∈Tη⊥, where orthogonality and Tη⊥ have the meanings in Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement. The efficient score vector and efficient information matrix are

Seff=Sθ−ΠTηSθ,Ieff=EP[SeffSeffT],

where ΠTη is the Hilbert-space orthogonal projection applied coordinatewise. This projection exists and is unique because Tη is a closed linear subspace; the projection theorem used by Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace assumes Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Remarks

The formula does not assert nonsingularity. If Ieff is singular, the inverse-information expression is not defined. The finite-dimensional canonical-gradient formula requires the full score-space decomposition and nonsingularity as additional hypotheses, established in the accompanying theorem on this page.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources