Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equicontinuity at a point, uniform equicontinuity, and pointwise boundedness of a family of maps between metric spaces

Definition

Let (X,dX)(X,d_X) and (Y,dY)(Y,d_Y) be metric spaces (Metric space: d(x,y)=0d(x,y) = 0 iff x=yx = y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric) and let FYX\mathcal{F} \subseteq Y^{X} be a set of functions XYX \to Y (The topology of pointwise convergence on YXY^{X}, which is the product topology, and its restriction to C(X,Y)C(X,Y)). Let aXa \in X.

  • F\mathcal{F} is equicontinuous at aa if for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that dY(f(x),f(a))<εfor every fF and every xX with dX(x,a)<δ.d_Y\big(f(x), f(a)\big) < \varepsilon \qquad \text{for every } f \in \mathcal{F} \text{ and every } x \in X \text{ with } d_X(x,a) < \delta .
  • F\mathcal{F} is equicontinuous if it is equicontinuous at every point of XX.
  • F\mathcal{F} is uniformly equicontinuous if for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that dY(f(x),f(x))<εfor every fF and all x,xX with dX(x,x)<δ.d_Y\big(f(x), f(x')\big) < \varepsilon \qquad \text{for every } f \in \mathcal{F} \text{ and all } x, x' \in X \text{ with } d_X(x,x') < \delta .
  • F\mathcal{F} is pointwise bounded if for every xXx \in X the set F(x):={f(x):fF}\mathcal{F}(x) := \{\, f(x) : f \in \mathcal{F} \,\} is a bounded subset of YY (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).

Everything is in the quantifier order, and the order is the only difference from ordinary continuity. Continuity of each single fFf \in \mathcal{F} at aa allows δ\delta to depend on ε\varepsilon, on aa and on ff (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta form); equicontinuity at aa demands one δ\delta serving every member of the family at once. Uniform continuity of each single ff allows δ\delta to depend on ε\varepsilon and on ff (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ\delta serving every point); uniform equicontinuity demands one δ\delta serving every member and every pair of points at once. Written with the quantifiers in order, the four conditions are

εfaδ,εaδf,εfδa,εδfa\forall \varepsilon\, \forall f\, \forall a\, \exists \delta, \qquad \forall \varepsilon\, \forall a\, \exists \delta\, \forall f, \qquad \forall \varepsilon\, \forall f\, \exists \delta\, \forall a, \qquad \forall \varepsilon\, \exists \delta\, \forall f\, \forall a

for pointwise continuity of each member, equicontinuity, uniform continuity of each member, and uniform equicontinuity respectively.

Immediate consequences, recorded because they are used.

  1. Every member of an equicontinuous family is continuous, and every member of a uniformly equicontinuous family is uniformly continuous: the δ\delta that serves the whole family serves each member (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta form, Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ\delta serving every point).
  2. Uniform equicontinuity implies equicontinuity, by taking x=ax' = a.
  3. Both conditions are about the metrics dXd_X and dYd_Y, not about the topologies they induce. Replacing a metric by a topologically equivalent one can destroy either, exactly as it can destroy uniform continuity.
  4. A one-element family {f}\{f\} is equicontinuous exactly when ff is continuous, and uniformly equicontinuous exactly when ff is uniformly continuous; so the notions do generalise the single-function ones and do not merely resemble them.

Pointwise boundedness is a hypothesis about the values, not about the functions. It says that at each individual point the family's values stay in one ball of YY; the radius may depend on the point, and no single ball need contain all the values at all the points. The stronger condition, that xF(x)\bigcup_{x} \mathcal{F}(x) is bounded, is uniform boundedness and is not defined here, nothing on this page using it.

Remarks

  • Why this definition sits on this page. Equicontinuity is the hypothesis of the Ascoli-Arzelà theorem, which characterises the compact subsets of C(X,Y)C(X,Y) in the topology of compact convergence (The topology of compact convergence on C(X,Y)C(X,Y) for metric XX and YY: uniform convergence on each compact subset of XX). That theorem is not proved here and is not stated here; the definition is placed on this page so that the page proving it has the vocabulary available earlier in the reading order. Nothing below this item uses equicontinuity except the companion page's examples.

  • Neither condition is implied by the other two hypotheses of Ascoli. Pointwise boundedness does not imply equicontinuity, and the companion page gives a family of continuous functions on [0,1][0,1] with all values in [0,1][0,1] that fails to be equicontinuous at 00. Conversely an equicontinuous family need not be pointwise bounded: the constant functions with values 0,1,2,0, 1, 2, \dots are uniformly equicontinuous and unbounded at every point.

  • A convenient sufficient condition. A family of maps that are all Lipschitz with one common constant LL is uniformly equicontinuous, δ:=ε/(L+1)\delta := \varepsilon/(L+1) serving. The companion page uses this for the 11-Lipschitz maps into R\mathbb{R}, among them all the distance functions xdX(x,A)x \mapsto d_X(x,A).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 113 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources