How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Grand maximal test class of order N and the grand maximal function
Definition
Fix an integer and let carry the seminorms and topology of Schwartz space and its seminorms and Schwartz topology and convergence, with multi-indices as in maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space. For each integer and define the Schwartz test seminorm of order and the grand maximal test class of order
For the grand maximal function of order is where and convolution is the distributional convolution of Convolution of a tempered distribution with a schwartz function. The dilated test is Schwartz for every (Dilations and their normalisations preserve Schwartz space, with scaling identities), so each displayed convolution is defined even when . Thus the full class , including its zero-integral tests, is used. Each convolution has a finite scalar value and the supremum is a well-defined function with values in ; the value is allowed and no measurability is asserted here. The class contains the zero function, is symmetric under and under complex conjugation, and is nonempty for every . No choice principle is used in this definition.
The order is a parameter. The characterisation theorem on this page fixes a finite admissible order depending only on , and the fixed kernel and works for every ; the value of is whatever the accumulated comparison estimates of that proof require, and its existence, not an explicit formula, is what the page uses. The sources record the explicit sufficient choices for the nontangential class in [DKKP, Proposition 1, p. 60], for the radial class (with derivatives through order ) in [MSV, section 1, p. 16], and in [CUW, Theorem 3.1, p. 8]; these recorded choices are not used as the definition of below. If then pointwise, so and hence for every : the grand maximal functions are monotone in the order. The aperture is fixed to one; the comparison with larger apertures is the subject of the domination lemma on this page.
Depends on
- Radial and nontangential maximal functions of a tempered distribution
- Schwartz space and its seminorms
- Schwartz topology and convergence
- $C^k$ maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space
- Tempered distribution
- Convolution of a tempered distribution with a schwartz function
- Dilations and their normalisations preserve Schwartz space, with scaling identities
Used by
- Atoms have uniformly bounded Hᵖ quasi-norm and uniformly bounded test pairings Lemma
- L2-normalised H1 atoms have uniformly bounded H1 norm Lemma
- Level decomposition of an Hᵖ distribution produces atoms Lemma
- ℓᵖ sums of atoms converge in S' and in Hᵖ Lemma
- Measurability and lower semicontinuity of the smooth maximal functions Lemma
- The grand maximal function dominates every admissible radial and nontangential maximal function Lemma
- The grand maximal function is pointwise dominated by a tangential maximal function Lemma
- Truncated maximal functions: finiteness, comparison estimates and the good-set bound Lemma
- Maximal-function characterisations of real Hardy spaces Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shai Dekel, Gerard Kerkyacharian, George Kyriazis, Pencho Petrushev, A New Proof of the Atomic Decomposition of Hardy Spaces, Constructive Theory of Functions (Sozopol 2016), pp. 59-73 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stefano Meda, Peter Sjogren, Maria Vallarino, Atomic decompositions and operators on Hardy spaces, Revista de la Union Matematica Argentina 50 (2009), no. 2, 15-22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Cruz-Uribe SFO, Li-An Daniel Wang, Variable Hardy Spaces, arXiv:1211.6505 (2012) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Marcin Bownik, Anisotropic Hardy Spaces and Wavelets, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 164 (2003), no. 781 (standard reference, not scraped)