Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The tangential maximal function is controlled by the aperture-one nontangential maximal function in Lp

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥1, 0<q<p<∞, T=n/q and φ∈S(Rn) with ∫φ≠0. For f∈S′(Rn) define the tangential maximal function Mφ,Tf(x)=sup⁡t>0 sup⁡y∈Rn∣(f∗φt)(x−y)∣(1+∣y∣/t)T,x∈Rn. For a nonnegative Borel function g define the extended centered average M~g(x):=sup⁡r>01λ(B(x,r))∫B(x,r)g, where the nonnegative Lebesgue integral may be +∞. If g∈Lloc1, then M~g agrees with the centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal function Mg of The centered and uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal functions. The aperture-one nontangential maximal function Mφ∗,1f is the one of Radial and nontangential maximal functions of a tempered distribution. Then, pointwise, Mφ,Tf(x)q≤M~((Mφ∗,1f)q)(x). If ∥Mφ∗,1f∥Lp<∞, then ∥Mφ,Tf∥Lp≤Cn,p,q∥Mφ∗,1f∥Lp, with Cn,p,q depending only on n,p,q. The norm inequality also holds in the extended sense when the right-hand side is infinite, in which case it is trivial.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 0<q<p<∞, T=n/q, φ∈S with ∫φ≠0, f∈S′ and x∈Rn.

[L1]

For every a∈Rn and r>0, λ(B(a,r))=cnrn with cn=ωn−1/n>0: the centred-ball formula is Sphere and ball measures scale in Rn and translation invariance is Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation. Hence B(x−y,t)⊆B(x,∣y∣+t) and the volume ratio is (1+∣y∣/t)n.

[F1]

For every z∈B(x−y,t) one has ∣(f∗φt)(x−y)∣≤Mφ∗,1f(z), because ∣z−(x−y)∣<t and the supremum defining Mφ∗,1f(z) runs over t>0 and all points within distance t of z (Radial and nontangential maximal functions of a tempered distribution).

[F2]

The centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator satisfies the strong Lr bound ∥Mg∥r≤Cn,r∥g∥r for 1<r<∞ (The centered maximal operator is bounded on Lp(Rn) for 1<p<∞, The centered and uncentered Hardy-Littlewood maximal functions).

[F3]

The tangential maximal function is Borel because it is a supremum, over fixed t,y, of continuous functions of x. The aperture-one nontangential maximal function is Borel for f∈S′ (Measurability and lower semicontinuity of the smooth maximal functions). Also, for every r>1, Lr(Rn)⊂Lloc1(Rn): for compact K, Holder gives ∫K∣g∣≤λ(K)1−1/r∥g∥r, and bounded sets have finite measure (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure).

Proof technique: local averaging over the ball of radius t and the Hardy-Littlewood maximal bound.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1F1F3algebra

Pointwise bound. Fix x,y,t and put g=(Mφ∗,1f)q, which is nonnegative Borel by [F3]. By [F1], ∣(f∗φt)(x−y)∣q≤g(z) for every z∈B(x−y,t). Averaging (allowing an infinite integral) and enlarging to B(x,∣y∣+t) gives ∣(f∗φt)(x−y)∣q≤1λ(B(x−y,t))∫B(x−y,t)g≤λ(B(x,∣y∣+t))λ(B(x−y,t))⋅1λ(B(x,∣y∣+t))∫B(x,∣y∣+t)g≤(1+∣y∣/t)n M~g(x), by [L1]. Since Tq=n, division by (1+∣y∣/t)Tq and taking the supremum over t,y proves the pointwise inequality.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

Lp bound. If ∥Mφ∗,1f∥Lp=∞, the asserted norm inequality is trivial. Otherwise [F3] gives that g=(Mφ∗,1f)q is Borel and belongs to Lp/q. Since p/q>1, [F3] also gives g∈Lloc1, so M~g=Mg. Apply [F2] with r=p/q and use step 1.1: ∥Mφ,Tf∥Lpq=∥(Mφ,Tf)q∥Lp/q≤∥Mg∥Lp/q≤Cn,p,q∥g∥Lp/q=Cn,p,q∥Mφ∗,1f∥Lpq. Taking q-th roots proves the estimate (with the constant renamed).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Conclusion. Step 1.1 gives pointwise domination by the extended centered average, which agrees with the ordinary maximal operator on the locally integrable input in step 2.1; the strong Lp/q bound then proves the norm estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources