How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The graph-nonisomorphism interactive protocol
Definition
For two graphs on the same labelled vertex set , the verifier chooses uniformly from . It independently samples a permutation by the following bounded procedure. Put (with when ). Up to four times, draw exactly fresh fair bits as an integer ; on the first draw with , unrank in the factorial number system to obtain . If all four draws fail, use the identity permutation. It sends , receives a bit from the prover, and accepts iff . Factoradic unranking, the factorial arithmetic, the four draws, and graph relabeling take polynomial time and use at most random bits.
Each draw succeeds with probability (or when ). Conditional on at least one success, is exactly uniform on the permutations; the fallback has probability (zero when is a power of two). This is a one-round instance of Interactive-proof transcripts, rounds, and prover strategies.
Depends on
Used by
- Graph nonisomorphism is in IP Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arora and Barak, §8.3 (standard reference, not scraped)