How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Interactive-proof transcripts, rounds, and prover strategies
Definition
An interactive protocol on input is an alternating finite exchange between a probabilistic polynomial-time verifier (Probabilistic polynomial-time Turing machines) and a prover . A round consists of one verifier message and one prover message; the verifier uses at most polynomially many rounds, communicated bits, and random bits in .
A public transcript is exactly the sequence of messages exchanged so far, together with any random bits that the verifier has revealed. The verifier's unrevealed random bits and private work-tape state belong to its private history, not to the public transcript. A prover strategy is an arbitrary function assigning a legal next message to every public transcript at a prover turn; it need not be computable or efficient. Consequently two verifier histories that give the prover the same public view must receive the same prover response.
Used by
- Completeness and soundness of an interactive protocol Definition
- Protocol game trees and their values Definition
- The graph-nonisomorphism interactive protocol Definition
- False: the prover must run in polynomial time False statement
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Arora and Barak, Computational Complexity, §8.2 (standard reference, not scraped)