How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Graph nonisomorphism is in IP
Statement
lies in .
Proof
Given: the graph-nonisomorphism protocol.
If , the isomorphism class of identifies the unique , so an unbounded prover answers correctly with probability .
If , the distributions of and are identical; even conditioned on , is uniform, so every prover succeeds with probability . This verifies the protocol The graph-nonisomorphism interactive protocol.
Run two fresh independent challenges and accept only when both answers are correct. On a no instance, after every first transcript the second challenge is still independent and every response succeeds with conditional probability at most ; thus the two-copy soundness is at most , while completeness remains . Hence The class IP applies.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arora and Barak, §8.3 (standard reference, not scraped)