How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Injectivity radius at a point and of a manifold
Definition
Assume . For , put The injectivity radius at and the injectivity radius of are the extended nonnegative numbers For the empty manifold, the second infimum is defined to be .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A boundaryless Riemannian manifold and, for the pointwise clause, .
Under The Axiom of Countable Choice (), Existence of normal neighborhoods supplies an open star-shaped exponential-diffeomorphism domain about .
The extended real line , its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined supplies and the extended order used by the supremum and infimum conventions.
Verification
The set is nonempty: by [F1], an open exponential-diffeomorphism domain contains some ball with , and restricting a diffeomorphism to that ball remains a diffeomorphism onto its open image. It is downward closed among positive radii. Hence its supremum is a well-defined element of ; it is exactly when admissible radii are unbounded.
If is nonempty, the set of positive pointwise radii has an infimum in ; it may be zero even though every term is positive. For , the stated empty-infimum convention gives . In dimension zero, and every positive-radius ball is that singleton, so and ; dimension one uses the displayed formula unchanged. The balls are open, so their sphere endpoints are not included, while is always included. is used only through [F1], not in taking the uniquely determined supremum or infimum.
Depends on
Used by
- A complete manifold with zero global injectivity radius Counterexample
- Injectivity radius at each point is positive Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry, Definition 23.3.3, pp.171--172 (standard reference, not scraped)