Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Involution on L1 of a locally compact group

Definition

Assume AC. Let G be an LCH group with a fixed left Haar measure μ, let ΔG be the modular function of G (Modular function of a locally compact group), and write L1(G):=L1(G,μ;C) with norm ∥⋅∥1 (Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions). For a complex-valued function f on G put f∗(x):=ΔG(x−1) f(x−1)‾(x∈G), and define the involution of L1(G) to be the map f↦f∗ that assigns to the class of f the class of f∗.

Thus the involution is the composition of inversion, complex conjugation and multiplication by the continuous positive function ΔG∘inv⁡, where inv⁡(x)=x−1. On a unimodular group ΔG≡1 (Unimodular locally compact group) and the involution reduces to the naive inversion f∗(x)=f(x−1)‾.

Well-definedness. The map inv⁡ is a homeomorphism of G (Left and right translations and inversion in a topological group are homeomorphisms), so inv⁡ and its inverse carry Borel sets to Borel sets and a Borel function f has f∘inv⁡ Borel; ΔG∘inv⁡ is continuous, hence Borel (The modular function is a continuous homomorphism, Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable), and complex conjugation is continuous. So f∗ is measurable whenever f is. Integrability and norm: the change of variables under inversion (Haar change of variables under inversion) applied to the nonnegative Borel function H(t):=ΔG(t)∣f(t)∣ gives ∫G∣f∗∣ dμ=∫GH(x−1) dμ(x)=∫GΔG(x−1)H(x) dμ(x)=∫G∣f∣ dμ<∞, because ΔG(x−1)ΔG(x)=1, so f∗ is μ-integrable with ∥f∗∥1=∥f∥1. Independence of the representative: applying the same identity to the indicator of a Borel set E gives μ(E−1)=∫EΔG(x−1) dμ(x), and the density ΔG∘inv⁡ is strictly positive, so μ(E−1)=0 exactly when μ(E)=0; hence f=0 a.e. implies f∗=0 a.e., and two representatives of one class of L1(G) give two representatives of one class. The assignment is therefore a well-defined map L1(G)→L1(G).

Remarks

Normalisation. The factor ΔG(x−1) is the one that makes the involution isometric, ∥f∗∥1=∥f∥1, and later makes it reverse convolution, (f∗g)∗=g∗∗f∗ (The L1 involution is isometric, involutive and reverses convolution); without it the map f↦f(x−1)‾ is not isometric on a nonunimodular group (Naive inversion is not the L1 involution on a nonunimodular group ↗).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources