How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a Radon measure on an LCH space . Then the complex spaces and (Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions) are complete, and is dense in both of them.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An LCH space with a Radon measure , the complex spaces for , the real spaces , and AC.
For the complex space consists of the almost-everywhere equivalence classes of measurable complex functions with , on classes it is a complex normed space, and denotes the continuous complex-valued functions of compact support (Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions).
Assume countable choice (in particular, the Axiom of Choice suffices). Let be a measure space and let . Then is complete (Riesz-Fischer completeness of for ).
Assume Dependent Choice. If is a Radon measure on an LCH space and , then is dense in (C_c(X) is dense in L^p(mu) for a Radon measure).
If are measurable then (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
Let be a Peano system, in particular . For any set , any and any there is a unique with and for all (The recursion theorem).
DC is the statement that for every nonempty set , every relation entire on and every there is with and for every (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
is the statement that for every family of nonempty sets there is with domain and for every (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
denotes the continuous -valued functions with compact support, for or , and denotes the real space (Compact support, , and ).
AC is assumed, in the choice-function form that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Discharge the Dependent Choice hypothesis of [F3] from AC. Let be entire on a nonempty set and let . The family of nonempty sets has, by [A1], a choice function with for every ; put , so that for every . Applying [F5] to the set , the point and the function gives with and ; then for every . This is exactly the conclusion required by [F6], so DC holds.
Discharge the countable choice hypothesis of [F2] from AC. Let be a family of nonempty sets. Its range is a family of nonempty sets, so by [A1] there is a choice function on that family with for every ; the function , , satisfies for every , which is the conclusion required by [F7]. So holds.
For every one has , and ; consequently for all also and , and for real one has .
Let be a Cauchy sequence in . Its real and imaginary parts are Cauchy in the real space : by the first two inequalities of step 1.3 and monotonicity [F4], and likewise for the imaginary parts, the two left-hand sides being the norms of the real classes and . The same argument with in place of and the last inequality of step 1.3 shows that a Cauchy sequence in has real and imaginary parts that are Cauchy in the real space .
Complex density. Let with and let . The real and imaginary parts of are real classes in by [F1], and is finite, so by [F3] under the Dependent Choice of step 1.1 there are real with and . Then by [F8], and for steps 1.3 and [F4] give , while for the last inequality of step 1.3 and [F4] give . Thus is dense in for both .
Let be a Cauchy sequence in , or in ; fix accordingly. By step 2.1 the real sequences and are Cauchy in the real space , so by [F2] under the countable choice of step 1.2 there are with and .
Recombination, for as in step 3.1. Define , the class of the measurable complex function , which lies in because and for the finite by steps 1.3 and [F4] in the case and by the last inequality of step 1.3 and [F4] in the case . Then by the same two computations applied to together with step 3.1, so converges in . Hence both complex spaces are complete.
Combining the density of step 2.2 with the completeness of step 4.1, the complex spaces and are complete and is dense in both. ∎
Remarks
- Where choice is spent. Steps 1.1 and 1.2 are the only uses of [A1]: they supply the Dependent Choice hypothesis of the density theorem [F3] and the countable choice hypothesis of Riesz–Fischer completeness [F2]. The Cauchy-sequence reduction and the recombination are choice-free.
- Why the complex spaces are treated locally. The published completeness theorem [F2] and density theorem [F3] are statements about the real spaces of The space as the quotient by null functions; the complex statements asserted here are obtained by the componentwise reduction above rather than assumed.
Depends on
- Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions
- Riesz-Fischer completeness of $L^p$ for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- C_c(X) is dense in L^p(mu) for a Radon measure
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Axiom of Choice
- Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Compact support, $C_c(X)$, and $C_0(X)$
- The recursion theorem
Used by
- Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group Definition
- Involution on L1 of a locally compact group Definition
- Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group Definition
- Convolution of matrix coefficients on a compact group Example
- Convolution on a discrete group Example
- Strong continuity of left and modular right translations on L1 and L2 Lemma
- The L1 involution is isometric, involutive and reverses convolution Lemma
- The L1 group algebra has a unit exactly when the group is discrete Proposition
- L1 group algebras have a contractively bounded approximate identity Theorem
- L1 of a locally compact group is a Banach star-algebra Theorem
- The regular representations are unitary, strongly continuous, and the left one is faithful Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lynn Loomis, An Introduction to Abstract Harmonic Analysis, §§30A–30B (standard reference, not scraped)