How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Convolution of matrix coefficients on a compact group
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a compact Hausdorff group with its normalized Haar probability measure (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group). Then the constant function satisfies . Moreover, for continuous finite-dimensional irreducible unitary representations on and on of (Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility) with first-variable-linear coefficients the convolution of coefficients is zero when . If they are equivalent, choose any unitary intertwiner satisfying . Then This formula is independent of the choice of . When on the same space, one may take .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact Hausdorff group with its normalized Haar probability measure , continuous finite-dimensional irreducible unitary representations on and on , and AC.
A compact Hausdorff group has a left Haar probability measure, and that measure is right invariant; a compact group is unimodular, so and inversion preserves (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group, Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular, Unimodular locally compact group, Haar change of variables under inversion).
For convolution is , and convolution on is the unique -bilinear extension with , jointly continuous and agreeing with the formula (Compactly supported convolution on a group, Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group, Submultiplicativity of convolution in the L1 norm).
is dense in and in ; on the probability space one has for , and with (Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc, Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions).
carries the first-variable-linear inner product , whose induced norm is (The complex pairing on equivalence classes).
Left and modular right translations are strongly continuous on ; since here, the plain right translation is strongly continuous (Strong continuity of left and modular right translations on L1 and L2, [F1]).
A subrepresentation of a finite-dimensional representation is a linear subspace carried into itself by every , and irreducibility means the nonzero space has no proper nonzero subrepresentation; an intertwiner is a linear map with for all , and equivalence means the existence of an invertible intertwiner (Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility, Intertwiners, the spaces and , equivalent representations, and faithful representations, A finite-dimensional representation over a field, and its degree).
Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional complex vector space has an eigenvalue in (Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue).
For a continuous finite-dimensional irreducible unitary representation the coefficient is continuous because and the inner product are continuous, and by Cauchy–Schwarz and unitarity, so it lies in and because is a probability measure.
AC is assumed in the choice-function form of the cited definition; it is inherited from the Haar-measure, completeness and strong-continuity suppliers [F1], [F3] and [F5], and is first used in step 1.1 through [F3] (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
Coefficients are square integrable. By [F8] each coefficient and is continuous with and , so both lie in with because is a probability measure; the description of used here is the one of [F3], available under the AC of [A1].
The integral formula computes convolution for -functions. Let and put . For each the integral converges absolutely with by Cauchy–Schwarz [F4]. The function is continuous: for , Cauchy–Schwarz and the measure-preserving substitution (measure preserving by the unimodularity and inversion invariance of [F1]) give as by strong continuity of right translation [F5]. Also : the pointwise Cauchy–Schwarz bound and give by left invariance of [F1]. Finally, on the map is the convolution by [F2], and both and the convolution are continuous bilinear maps from into : the first because , the second because , using on the probability space and [F2], [F3]; so density of in [F3] forces for all .
The averaged operator. Define by , the integral being computed componentwise in a basis of ; the integrand is continuous on the compact group, so the integral exists and is linear in . Then intertwines with : for and , substituting and using invariance of gives , using and the substitution .
The constant function. Since and by [F3], the integral formula of step 1.2 gives for every , so .
The product identity. For , the integral formula of step 1.2 applied to the coefficients of step 1.1 gives where the second equality uses and the linearity of the inner product in its first variable; the right-hand side is with as in step 1.3.
The trace of in the case . Suppose is the same representation on , of dimension , so that is an endomorphism of ; write , a rank-one operator with by unitarity of . Integrating the traces, .
The Schur step. The kernel and the image of any intertwiner are subrepresentations, by [F6]; hence if , irreducibility makes an isomorphism. Thus forces . If , rescale an invertible intertwiner to a unitary one : commutes with , hence is a positive scalar by the eigenvalue argument of [F7] and irreducibility. Then commutes with and is scalar by the same argument. Replacing by in the trace calculation of step 2.3 gives , so .
The coefficient products. The coefficients lie in by [F3] and [F8], so step 2.2 computes their convolution. If , by step 3.1. Otherwise step 3.1 gives , hence step 2.2 gives . Any two unitary intertwiners differ by a scalar with , since their quotient commutes with and the scalar-endomorphism argument of step 3.1 applies. Replacing by conjugate-scales the first factor and scales the coefficient by , so the product is independent of .
Together with from step 2.1, step 4.1 proves the coefficient formula for inequivalent and equivalent irreducible representations. For , taking gives . ∎
Verification notes
- Hypotheses used. Continuity, irreducibility, unitarity in a finite dimension and compactness of enter; the coefficient pairs the "input" vector of the first coefficient with the "output" vector of the second, and uses the two remaining vectors, matching the classical matrix-unit rule.
- Choice cost. [A1] is inherited from the suppliers [F1], [F3] and [F5] and is first used in step 1.1 through [F3], as declared in the fact itself; the eigenvalue theorem [F7], the averaging, the trace computation and the norm estimates add no further selection.
Depends on
- Normalized Haar probability on a compact group
- Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular
- Compactly supported convolution on a group
- Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group
- Submultiplicativity of convolution in the L1 norm
- Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc
- Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions
- The complex $L^2$ pairing on equivalence classes
- Strong continuity of left and modular right translations on L1 and L2
- Haar change of variables under inversion
- Unimodular locally compact group
- Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility
- Intertwiners, the spaces $\operatorname{Hom}_G(V,W)$ and $\operatorname{End}_G(V)$, equivalent representations, and faithful representations
- A finite-dimensional representation $\rho:G\to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ over a field, and its degree
- Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emmanuel Kowalski, Representation Theory of Groups, §§5.2–5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lynn Loomis, An Introduction to Abstract Harmonic Analysis, §§30–31 (standard reference, not scraped)