Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Modular Function and L1 Group Algebras — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These computations specialise the main page to concrete groups. Under AC, the positive affine group G=(0,∞)⋊R carries the left Haar measure a−2 da db and has modular function ΔG(a,b)=a−1, so it is nonunimodular. On a discrete group with Haar measure μ=c⋅counting, calculus on the absolutely convergent convolution series gives the naive involution f∗(x)=f(x−1)‾ and the norm-one identity c−11{e}. On a compact group with its normalized Haar probability the constant function is idempotent, while the convolution of matrix coefficients vanishes across inequivalent continuous finite-dimensional irreducible unitary representations and equals the matrix unit (⟨u,z⟩/dim⁡π)fw,vπ for one and the same representation.

Under AC, the counterexample completes the picture negatively: on the nonunimodular affine group, naive inversion without the modular factor fails to be isometric on L1(G) and therefore is not the L1 involution, whose isometry is exactly what the modular correction supplies.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27Open item page →

The modular function of the affine group of the line

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Let G:={(a,b):a>0, b∈R} with the multiplication (a,b)(a′,b′)=(aa′, b+ab′), the connected component of the identity of the affine group of the line. Then dμ=a−2 da db is a left Haar measure on G, and the modular function of G with respect to it is ΔG(a,b)=a−1. Since a↦a−1 is not identically 1, the group G is nonunimodular (Unimodular locally compact group).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The group G=(0,∞)×R with (a,b)(a′,b′)=(aa′,b+ab′), the measure dμ=a−2 da db on it, and AC.

[F1]

G is a group with identity (1,0) and inverse (a,b)−1=(a−1,−b/a); it is an open subset of R2, hence an LCH space for the subspace topology, and multiplication and inversion are continuous (Group and abelian group, Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space).

[F2]

A left Haar measure on an LCH group is a nonzero Borel measure that is left invariant, finite on compact sets, outer regular on Borel sets and inner regular on open sets (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure, Radon measure on an LCH space).

[F3]

With c(g) the unique scalar with ∫GF(xg) dμ(x)=c(g)∫GF dμ(x) for every nonnegative Borel F and every μ-integrable complex F, the modular function is ΔG(g)=c(g−1), and G is unimodular exactly when ΔG≡1 (Modular function of a locally compact group, Unimodular locally compact group, Right translation scales left Haar measure).

[F4]

Under countable choice (in particular under AC), a C1 diffeomorphism T:U→V between open subsets of R2 satisfies ∫Vf(y) dy=∫Uf(Tx)∣det⁡DT(x)∣ dx for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable f (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn).

[F5]

a−2 da db denotes the measure E↦∫Ea−2 da db given by the Lebesgue density a−2>0 on the open set (0,∞)×R, and every nonempty open subset of G has strictly positive μ-measure.

[A1]

AC is assumed in the choice-function form of the cited definition; it entails the countable choice under which [F4] is stated, and it underlies the well-definedness of the modular function quoted in [F3] (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

dμ=a−2 da db is a nonzero Borel measure, finite on compact sets: on a compact K⊆G the continuous density a−2 attains a maximum, so μ(K)≤max⁡Ka−2⋅λ2(K)<∞, while every nonempty open set has positive measure by [F5]. The rational rectangles contained in G form a countable base, so G is second countable. Under the countable choice implied by [A1], the compact-finite Borel measure μ is outer regular on Borel sets and inner regular on open sets by Locally finite Borel measures on second-countable LCH spaces are regular.

A1F1F2F5
1.2

Left invariance. Fix g0=(a0,b0)∈G. Left multiplication is Lg0(a,b)=(a0a, b0+a0b), a C1 diffeomorphism of G with det⁡DLg0=a02 at every point. For nonnegative Borel F, the change of variables [F4], whose countable-choice hypothesis is in force by [A1], applied to (u,v)=Lg0(a,b) gives ∫GF(Lg0(a,b)) a−2 da db=∫GF(u,v) (u/a0)−2a0−2 du dv=∫GF(u,v) u−2 du dv, since the inverse map is a=u/a0, b=(v−b0)/a0 and ∣det⁡DLg0−1∣=a0−2. Hence μ is left invariant.

A1F4F5
1.3

Right translation scales μ by a0. With the same g0, right multiplication is Rg0(a,b)=(aa0, b+ab0), a C1 diffeomorphism with det⁡DRg0(a,b)=det⁡(a00b01)=a0. For nonnegative Borel F, the change of variables [F4], again in force by [A1], with (u,v)=(aa0,b+ab0) gives ∫GF(aa0,b+ab0) a−2 da db=∫GF(u,v) (u/a0)−2a0−1 du dv=a0∫GF(u,v)u−2 du dv, using a=u/a0, b=v−(u/a0)b0 and ∣det⁡DRg0−1∣=a0−1. So ∫GF(xg0) dμ(x)=a0∫GF dμ for every nonnegative Borel F, and also for every μ-integrable F by linearity in the real and imaginary parts.

A1F4F5
2.1

The scalar of step 1.3 is c(g0)=a0, so ΔG(g0)=c(g0−1), the scalar c(g0−1) being the well-defined one supplied under the AC of [A1]; applying step 1.3 to g0−1=(a0−1,−b0/a0) gives c(g0−1)=a0−1. Hence ΔG(a0,b0)=a0−1 for every (a0,b0)∈G, which is the asserted modular function.

A1F3step 1.3
3.1

The function (a,b)↦a−1 is not identically 1 on G: at (2,0) it takes the value 1/2. By [F3] the group G is therefore not unimodular, while steps 1.1–1.2 show that a−2 da db is indeed a left Haar measure for which the computation of step 2.1 applies. ∎

F3step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1

Verification notes

  • Why the positive component. The full affine group {a≠0} has two components and its connected component of the identity is the a>0 part treated here, which avoids a disconnected sign convention for the modular function.
  • Choice cost. AC is declared as [A1]; its countable-choice consequence is used in steps 1.2 and 1.3 through the change-of-variables theorem [F4], and it underlies the well-definedness of the scalar c(g) quoted from [F3] in step 2.1. The Jacobian computations, the density a−2 and the nonunimodularity witness are choice-free.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27Open item page →

Convolution on a discrete group

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be a discrete group and let μ=c⋅counting be a fixed left Haar measure on it, c>0. Then G is unimodular, the involution on L1(G) is f∗(x)=f(x−1)‾, convolution is the (absolutely convergent) series (f∗g)(x)=c∑y∈Gf(y) g(y−1x)(f,g∈L1(G)), and u:=c−11{e} is the two-sided convolution identity, with ∥u∥1=1. The formula is available even for an uncountable discrete group, because an ℓ1 function vanishes off a countable set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a discrete group G, a left Haar measure μ=c⋅counting with c>0, and L1(G)=L1(G,μ;C).

[F1]

On an LCH group with the discrete topology, counting measure #G is a left Haar measure and a right Haar measure, and the fixed left Haar measure equals c #G with c=μ({e})>0; moreover ∫GH dμ=c∑y∈GH(y) for every nonnegative finite-valued H and every μ-integrable complex H, so μ is also right invariant (Counting measure on a discrete group is Haar, Haar measures there are its multiples, and integrals against them are sums).

[F2]

A discrete group is unimodular, so ΔG≡1 and the involution is f∗(x)=ΔG(x−1)f(x−1)‾=f(x−1)‾ (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular, Unimodular locally compact group, Involution on L1 of a locally compact group).

[F3]

For f,g∈Cc(G) the convolution is (f∗g)(x)=∫Gf(y)g(y−1x) dμ(y), and convolution on L1(G) is the unique C-bilinear extension of it satisfying ∥f∗g∥1≤∥f∥1∥g∥1, hence jointly continuous (Compactly supported convolution on a group, Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group, Submultiplicativity of convolution in the L1 norm).

[F5]

Cauchy–Schwarz for L2: if f,g∈L2(ν) for a measure ν, then ∫∣fg∣ dν≤∥f∥2∥g∥2; sums over G are the finite-subset sums of Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ2(I) (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F4]

Cc(G) is dense in L1(G); L1(G) consists of the a.e. classes of integrable complex functions with ∥f∥1=∫G∣f∣ dμ, and on a discrete group Cc(G) is exactly the space of finitely supported complex functions (Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc, Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions, Compact support, Cc(X), and C0(X), Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).

[A1]

AC is assumed in the choice-function form of the cited definition; it is inherited here from the density and completeness supplier [F4] and is first used in step 1.3, where that supplier is applied (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The measure and the involution. By [F1], μ=c⋅counting and μ is right invariant, so G is unimodular; by [F2] the involution of L1(G) is f∗(x)=f(x−1)‾.

F1F2
1.2

The formula on finitely supported functions. For f,g∈Cc(G) and x∈G, only finitely many y have f(y)≠0, and by [F3] and [F1] (f∗g)(x)=∫Gf(y)g(y−1x) dμ(y)=c∑y∈Gf(y)g(y−1x).

F1F3
1.3

The series map is bilinear and bounded. For f,g∈L1(G) define h(x):=c∑y∈Gf(y)g(y−1x); on this discrete group each L1 class has a unique pointwise representative because every singleton has measure c>0. For each x, Cauchy--Schwarz gives ∑y∈G∣f(y)∣ ∣g(y−1x)∣≤∥f∥ℓ2∥g∥ℓ2≤∥f∥ℓ1∥g∥ℓ1<∞, where y↦y−1x is a bijection and ∥f∥ℓ2≤∥f∥ℓ1 for every summable family; this proves pointwise absolute convergence by [F1, F5]. For the L1 bound, rearrange the nonnegative double sum using the finite-subsum definition of sums in [F5]: ∑x∈G∣h(x)∣≤c∑x∈G∑y∈G∣f(y)∣ ∣g(y−1x)∣=c∑y∈G∣f(y)∣∑x∈G∣g(y−1x)∣=c∥f∥ℓ1∥g∥ℓ1. The last equality again uses the bijection x↦y−1x. Thus h∈L1(G) and ∥h∥1=c∑x∣h(x)∣≤c2∥f∥ℓ1∥g∥ℓ1=∥f∥1∥g∥1. Absolute convergence also gives bilinearity, so (f,g)↦h is a bounded, hence continuous, bilinear map into L1(G).

A1F1F4F5
2.1

The series computes the convolution. On Cc(G)×Cc(G) the map (f,g)↦h of step 1.3 agrees with the Cc convolution by step 1.2, and both (f,g)↦h and the L1 convolution are continuous bilinear maps on L1(G)×L1(G) by steps 1.3 and [F3]. Since Cc(G) is dense in L1(G) by [F4], they agree as L1 classes for all f,g∈L1(G). Every singleton has positive measure c, so equality of classes on this discrete group is pointwise equality; hence (f∗g)(x)=c∑y∈Gf(y)g(y−1x) for all x∈G.

A1F3F4step 1.2step 1.3
3.1

The convolution unit. Let u:=c−11{e}; then ∫G∣u∣ dμ=c⋅c−1=1, so u∈L1(G) and ∥u∥1=1. By step 2.1, (u∗g)(x)=c∑y∈Gu(y)g(y−1x)=c⋅c−1g(x)=g(x) and (g∗u)(x)=c∑y∈Gg(y)u(y−1x)=c⋅c−1g(x)=g(x) for every g∈L1(G) and every x, the only contributing index being y=e, respectively y=x. So u is a two-sided identity.

F1step 2.1
4.1

Collecting: on a discrete group with μ=c⋅counting the group is unimodular with f∗(x)=f(x−1)‾, convolution is the absolutely convergent series of step 2.1, and c−11{e} is the norm-one convolution identity. ∎

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Verification notes

  • Uncountable discrete groups. In steps 1.3 and 2.1 the sums are taken over the countable set where f and g are nonzero, so no sum over an uncountable set is asserted; counting measure on an uncountable discrete group is not σ-finite.
  • Choice cost. The only choice used is inherited from the density and completeness supplier [F4] and is recorded as [A1], where its exact use in steps 1.3 and 2.1 is declared; the series computation itself is choice-free.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27Open item page →

Convolution of matrix coefficients on a compact group

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be a compact Hausdorff group with its normalized Haar probability measure μ (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group). Then the constant function 1 satisfies 1∗1=1. Moreover, for continuous finite-dimensional irreducible unitary representations π on V and σ on W of G (Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility) with first-variable-linear coefficients fu,vπ(x):=⟨π(x)u,v⟩(u,v∈V),fw,zσ(x):=⟨σ(x)w,z⟩(w,z∈W), the convolution of coefficients is zero when π≇σ. If they are equivalent, choose any unitary intertwiner T:W→V satisfying Tσ(x)=π(x)T. Then fu,vπ∗fw,zσ=⟨u,Tz⟩dim⁡π fTw,vπ. This formula is independent of the choice of T. When σ=π on the same space, one may take T=IV.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact Hausdorff group G with its normalized Haar probability measure μ, continuous finite-dimensional irreducible unitary representations π on V and σ on W, and AC.

[F1]

A compact Hausdorff group has a left Haar probability measure, and that measure is right invariant; a compact group is unimodular, so ΔG≡1 and inversion preserves μ (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group, Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular, Unimodular locally compact group, Haar change of variables under inversion).

[F2]

For f,g∈Cc(G) convolution is (f∗g)(x)=∫Gf(y)g(y−1x) dμ(y), and convolution on L1(G) is the unique C-bilinear extension with ∥f∗g∥1≤∥f∥1∥g∥1, jointly continuous and agreeing with the Cc formula (Compactly supported convolution on a group, Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group, Submultiplicativity of convolution in the L1 norm).

[F3]

Cc(G) is dense in L1(G) and in L2(G); on the probability space G one has ∥h∥1≤∥h∥2 for h∈L2(G), and Lp(G)=Lp(G,μ;C) with ∥h∥p=(∫G∣h∣p dμ)1/p (Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc, Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions).

[F4]

L2(G) carries the first-variable-linear inner product ⟨h,k⟩=∫Ghk‾ dμ, whose induced norm is ∥⋅∥2 (The complex L2 pairing on equivalence classes).

[F5]

Left and modular right translations are strongly continuous on L2(G); since ΔG≡1 here, the plain right translation h↦h(⋅ g) is strongly continuous (Strong continuity of left and modular right translations on L1 and L2, [F1]).

[F6]

A subrepresentation of a finite-dimensional representation is a linear subspace carried into itself by every ρ(g), and irreducibility means the nonzero space has no proper nonzero subrepresentation; an intertwiner is a linear map with fρ(g)=σ(g)f for all g, and equivalence means the existence of an invertible intertwiner (Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility, Intertwiners, the spaces Hom⁡G(V,W) and End⁡G(V), equivalent representations, and faithful representations, A finite-dimensional representation ρ:G→GL⁡(V) over a field, and its degree).

[F7]

Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional complex vector space has an eigenvalue in C (Every endomorphism of a nonzero finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field has an eigenvalue).

[F8]

For a continuous finite-dimensional irreducible unitary representation the coefficient fu,vπ(x)=⟨π(x)u,v⟩ is continuous because x↦π(x)u and the inner product are continuous, and ∣fu,vπ(x)∣≤∥u∥∥v∥ by Cauchy–Schwarz and unitarity, so it lies in L1(G) and L2(G) because μ is a probability measure.

[A1]

AC is assumed in the choice-function form of the cited definition; it is inherited from the Haar-measure, completeness and strong-continuity suppliers [F1], [F3] and [F5], and is first used in step 1.1 through [F3] (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Coefficients are square integrable. By [F8] each coefficient fu,vπ and fw,zσ is continuous with ∣fu,vπ∣≤∥u∥∥v∥ and ∣fw,zσ∣≤∥w∥∥z∥, so both lie in L∞(G)⊆L2(G) with ∥fu,vπ∥2,∥fw,zσ∥2<∞ because μ is a probability measure; the description of L2(G) used here is the one of [F3], available under the AC of [A1].

A1F3F8
1.2

The integral formula computes convolution for L2-functions. Let f,g∈L2(G) and put h(x):=∫Gf(y)g(y−1x) dμ(y). For each x the integral converges absolutely with ∣h(x)∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 by Cauchy–Schwarz [F4]. The function h is continuous: for x,x0∈G, Cauchy–Schwarz and the measure-preserving substitution y↦w=y−1x0 (measure preserving by the unimodularity and inversion invariance of [F1]) give ∣h(x)−h(x0)∣≤∥f∥2 ∥g(⋅ x0−1x)−g∥2→0 as x→x0 by strong continuity of right translation [F5]. Also ∥h∥2≤∥f∥2∥g∥2: the pointwise Cauchy–Schwarz bound and μ(G)=1 give ∫G∣h(x)∣2dμ(x)≤∫G(∫G∣f(y)∣2dμ(y))(∫G∣g(y−1x)∣2dμ(y))dμ(x)=∥f∥22∥g∥22 by left invariance of μ [F1]. Finally, on Cc(G)×Cc(G) the map (f,g)↦h is the Cc convolution by [F2], and both (f,g)↦h and the L1 convolution are continuous bilinear maps from L2(G)×L2(G) into L1(G): the first because ∥h∥1≤∥h∥2≤∥f∥2∥g∥2, the second because ∥f∗g∥1≤∥f∥1∥g∥1≤∥f∥2∥g∥2, using ∥t∥1≤∥t∥2 on the probability space G and [F2], [F3]; so density of Cc(G) in L2(G) [F3] forces h=f∗g for all f,g∈L2(G).

F1F2F3F4F5
1.3

The averaged operator. Define A:W→V by A(ξ):=∫G⟨σ(y)−1ξ,z⟩ π(y)u dμ(y), the integral being computed componentwise in a basis of V; the integrand is continuous on the compact group, so the integral exists and A is linear in ξ. Then A intertwines σ with π: for g∈G and ξ∈W, substituting y=gy′ and using invariance of μ gives A(σ(g)ξ)=∫G⟨σ(y)−1σ(g)ξ,z⟩π(y)u dμ(y)=∫G⟨σ(g−1y)−1ξ,z⟩π(y)u dμ(y)=∫G⟨σ(y′)−1ξ,z⟩π(gy′)u dμ(y′)=π(g)A(ξ), using σ(y)−1σ(g)=σ(y−1g) and the substitution y=gy′.

F1F6
2.1

The constant function. Since μ(G)=1 and 1∈L2(G) by [F3], the integral formula of step 1.2 gives (1∗1)(x)=∫G1 dμ=1 for every x, so 1∗1=1.

F1F3step 1.2
2.2

The product identity. For x∈G, the integral formula of step 1.2 applied to the coefficients of step 1.1 gives (fu,vπ∗fw,zσ)(x)=∫G⟨π(y)u,v⟩⟨σ(y−1x)w,z⟩ dμ(y)=⟨∫G⟨σ(y)−1σ(x)w,z⟩π(y)u dμ(y), v⟩, where the second equality uses σ(y−1x)=σ(y)−1σ(x) and the linearity of the inner product in its first variable; the right-hand side is ⟨A(σ(x)w),v⟩ with A as in step 1.3.

F4F6step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3
2.3

The trace of A in the case σ=π. Suppose σ is the same representation π on V, of dimension d, so that A is an endomorphism of V; write Ry(ξ):=⟨π(y)−1ξ,z⟩π(y)u=⟨ξ,π(y)z⟩π(y)u, a rank-one operator with tr⁡Ry=⟨π(y)u,π(y)z⟩=⟨u,z⟩ by unitarity of π(y). Integrating the traces, tr⁡A=∫G⟨u,z⟩ dμ(y)=⟨u,z⟩.

F1F4step 1.3
3.1

The Schur step. The kernel and the image of any intertwiner are subrepresentations, by [F6]; hence if A≠0, irreducibility makes A an isomorphism. Thus π≇σ forces A=0. If π≅σ, rescale an invertible intertwiner to a unitary one T:W→V: T∗T commutes with σ, hence is a positive scalar by the eigenvalue argument of [F7] and irreducibility. Then AT−1 commutes with π and is scalar by the same argument. Replacing z by Tz in the trace calculation of step 2.3 gives tr⁡(AT−1)=⟨u,Tz⟩, so A=(⟨u,Tz⟩/dim⁡π)T.

F6F7step 1.3step 2.3
4.1

The coefficient products. The coefficients lie in L2(G)⊆L1(G) by [F3] and [F8], so step 2.2 computes their convolution. If π≇σ, A=0 by step 3.1. Otherwise step 3.1 gives A=(⟨u,Tz⟩/dim⁡π)T, hence step 2.2 gives (fu,vπ∗fw,zσ)(x)=(⟨u,Tz⟩/dim⁡π)⟨π(x)Tw,v⟩. Any two unitary intertwiners differ by a scalar c with ∣c∣=1, since their quotient commutes with π and the scalar-endomorphism argument of step 3.1 applies. Replacing T by cT conjugate-scales the first factor and scales the coefficient by c, so the product is independent of T.

F2F3F8step 2.2step 3.1
5.1

Together with 1∗1=1 from step 2.1, step 4.1 proves the coefficient formula for inequivalent and equivalent irreducible representations. For σ=π, taking T=IV gives (⟨u,z⟩/dim⁡π)fw,vπ. ∎

step 2.1step 4.1

Verification notes

  • Hypotheses used. Continuity, irreducibility, unitarity in a finite dimension and compactness of G enter; the coefficient ⟨u,z⟩ pairs the "input" vector of the first coefficient with the "output" vector of the second, and fw,vπ uses the two remaining vectors, matching the classical matrix-unit rule.
  • Choice cost. [A1] is inherited from the suppliers [F1], [F3] and [F5] and is first used in step 1.1 through [F3], as declared in the fact itself; the eigenvalue theorem [F7], the averaging, the trace computation and the norm estimates add no further selection.
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-27Open item page →

Naive inversion is not the L1 involution on a nonunimodular group

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Let G={(a,b):a>0, b∈R} be the affine group of The modular function of the affine group of the line, with the left Haar measure dμ=a−2 da db and modular function ΔG(a,b)=a−1. Then the naive inversion formula Jf(x):=f(x−1)‾, without the modular factor fails to give an isometry of L1(G), even on Cc(G); consequently it is not the involution f∗(x)=ΔG(x−1)f(x−1)‾ of Involution on L1 of a locally compact group, which is isometric (The L1 involution is isometric, involutive and reverses convolution).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The affine group G with dμ=a−2 da db, ΔG(a,b)=a−1, and a nonnegative compactly supported cutoff supported in the region a>1.

[F1]

G is an LCH group with left Haar measure dμ=a−2da db and ΔG(a,b)=a−1; inverses are (a,b)−1=(a−1,−b/a) and ΔG≡1 fails, so G is nonunimodular (The modular function of the affine group of the line, Unimodular locally compact group).

[F2]

Haar change of variables under inversion: ∫GH(x−1) dμ(x)=∫GΔG(x−1)H(x) dμ(x) for nonnegative Borel H (with extended integrals), and for complex Borel H whenever ∫GΔG(x−1)∣H(x)∣ dμ(x)<∞ (Haar change of variables under inversion).

[F3]

The L1 involution is f∗(x)=ΔG(x−1)f(x−1)‾ and is isometric, ∥f∗∥1=∥f∥1, for every f∈L1(G) (Involution on L1 of a locally compact group, The L1 involution is isometric, involutive and reverses convolution).

[F4]

L1(G) consists of the a.e. classes of integrable complex functions with ∥f∥1=∫G∣f∣ dμ, and Cc(G) functions lie in L1(G) (Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions, Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).

[F5]

Under Dependent Choice, for a compact K inside an open U there is f∈Cc(G) with 1K≤f≤1U and supp⁡f⊆U by the cited proof's construction; AC implies Dependent Choice (LCH Urysohn cutoff, The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The modulus of Jf and the inversion formula. For a nonnegative f∈Cc(G), also Jf∈Cc(G) because inversion is a homeomorphism, and ∣Jf(x)∣=f(x−1). Thus [F2] gives ∥Jf∥1=∫Gf(x−1) dμ(x)=∫GΔG(x−1)f(x) dμ(x), while ∥f∥1=∫Gf(x) dμ(x); both integrals are finite by [F4].

F2F4
1.2

A witness in the region a>1. Take the open rectangle U:=(1,2)×(0,1) and a compact rectangle K:=[3/2,7/4]×[1/4,3/4]⊆U, and let f∈Cc(G) be given by [F5] under the Dependent Choice derived from the assumed AC, with 1K≤f≤1U. Then f≥0, f≢0, and on supp⁡f⊆U one has a>1, hence a−1>a−2 everywhere on (1,2).

F5
2.1

Comparison of norms. Since f≥0 and supp⁡f⊆{a>1}, step 1.1 gives ∥Jf∥1−∥f∥1=∫G(ΔG(x−1)−1)f(x) dμ(x)=∫G(a−1)f(a,b) a−2 da db, where a−1>0 on the support of f and f>0 on the nonempty open set where f≥1K=1, namely on the interior of K. The integrand is nonnegative continuous with a strictly positive value on an open subset of G, and a−2 da db gives positive measure to every nonempty open set, so ∥Jf∥1−∥f∥1>0: the norms differ.

F1F4step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Since J changes the L1 norm of the nonzero compactly supported function f of step 1.2, it cannot define an isometry of L1(G); the modular involution [F3], by contrast, is isometric. The naive inversion f↦f(x−1)‾ is therefore not the L1 involution on this nonunimodular group. ∎

F3step 2.1

Counterexample notes

  • Where the failure comes from. The discrepancy is the factor ΔG(x−1)=a accumulated by the inversion substitution; on a unimodular group ΔG≡1 and the naive formula does define the involution.
  • Choice cost. The single cutoff function uses the Dependent Choice of [F5]; the comparison computation itself is choice-free.

Sources