How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The L1 group algebra has a unit exactly when the group is discrete
Statement
Assume AC. Let be an LCH group with a fixed left Haar measure . Then has a two-sided identity for the convolution of Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group if and only if is discrete. For a discrete with , , the identity is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An LCH group with a fixed left Haar measure , the algebra with , and AC.
A left Haar measure is nonzero, positive on every nonempty open set, finite on compact sets, outer regular on Borel sets and inner regular on open sets; in particular a nonempty open set has strictly positive measure (Haar measure is positive on nonempty open sets and finite on compact sets, Left Haar integral and left Haar measure, Radon measure on an LCH space).
On an LCH group with the discrete topology, counting measure is a left Haar measure and a right Haar measure, and every left Haar measure equals with ; for every -integrable one has (Counting measure on a discrete group is Haar, Haar measures there are its multiples, and integrals against them are sums).
For one has and under AC (Compactly supported convolution on a group, Convolution preserves compact support and is associative).
Convolution on is the unique bilinear extension of the convolution with , hence jointly continuous (Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group, Submultiplicativity of convolution in the L1 norm).
is dense in , and (Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc, Compact support, , and ).
In a Hausdorff space every singleton is closed, and every finite union of closed sets is closed ( (Kolmogorov) and (Frechet) spaces, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not).
Every point of an LCH space has a compact neighbourhood, and there is a base of open sets with compact closure (In a locally compact Hausdorff space every open set containing a point contains an open set containing it whose closure is compact and still inside; such a space is regular).
Under Dependent Choice, for with compact and open there is with ; AC implies Dependent Choice (LCH Urysohn cutoff, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
AC is assumed, in the choice-function form of the cited definition; it is used in step 5.1 through [F8] (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Discrete case. Let be discrete. By [F2] there is with , so and the class lies in with . For and , [F3] gives and , since the only nonzero term has , respectively . Thus for all , and the identities extend to every by [F5] and the joint continuity of [F4]: for functions . So is a two-sided identity.
The functions are continuous for and , with . Choose with by [F5]. Each lies in by [F3] and satisfies for a constant independent of and , and also for every . Hence is uniformly Cauchy and converges uniformly to a continuous function . By [F4] it also converges in to ; Fatou's lemma (Fatou's lemma) applied to , where is a measurable representative of the limit , gives , so almost everywhere, so is a continuous representative of and inherits the bound by passing to the limit.
In a non-discrete the point has measure zero. If some identity neighbourhood of were finite, then every subset of the subspace would be closed there — each singleton is closed in by [F6] and a finite union of closed sets is closed — hence every subset of would be open in , and in particular for some open . Since is open in , that makes open in , so would be discrete. Thus, if is not discrete, every identity neighbourhood is infinite. Choose a compact neighbourhood of by [F7]. For each , choose distinct points in the interior of , which is an identity neighbourhood and hence infinite as just shown, and pairwise disjoint open neighbourhoods of , which exist by the Hausdorff property [F6] applied to the finitely many points. Then by finite additivity and left invariance of and [F1], for every ; hence .
If a continuous complex function on vanishes -a.e., then everywhere: the set is open by continuity and has measure zero, so it is empty by the positivity of on nonempty open sets [F1].
Let satisfy for every , and let . The class equals the class of , while the continuous function of step 1.2 represents its own class and is continuous; so , continuous by step 1.2, vanishes -a.e. and therefore vanishes everywhere by step 2.1. Consequently for every .
Evaluate at : for every . Choose with in , by [F5]. By [F3], , and , so the right-hand integrals converge to ; the left-hand values converge to by the uniform bound of step 1.2. Hence .
No unit exists when is not discrete. Suppose is not discrete and is such that for every . Then by step 1.3. Choose with , possible by [F5]. Since is outer regular and , there is an open identity neighbourhood with ; then . By [F8] under the Dependent Choice derived from [A1] there is with , and . Since forces , hence , step 4.1 gives , so , a contradiction. Therefore no with for all exists, and a fortiori no two-sided identity exists.
Combining step 1.1 and step 5.1: has a two-sided convolution identity exactly when is discrete, in which case and the identity is . ∎
Remarks
- Uniform bound, not pointwise convergence. Step 1.2 is what upgrades the class identity to a pointwise identity: without continuity of the value at would be undefined.
- Choice cost. [A1] enters only through the cutoff function of step 5.1; steps 1.1–4.1 are choice-free apart from the inherited density statement [F5].
Depends on
- Convolution preserves compact support and is associative
- Fatou's lemma
- Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group
- Compactly supported convolution on a group
- Submultiplicativity of convolution in the L1 norm
- Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc
- Haar measure is positive on nonempty open sets and finite on compact sets
- Counting measure on a discrete group is Haar, Haar measures there are its multiples, and integrals against them are sums
- Radon measure on an LCH space
- Left Haar integral and left Haar measure
- $T_0$ (Kolmogorov) and $T_1$ (Frechet) spaces
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- In a locally compact Hausdorff space every open set containing a point contains an open set containing it whose closure is compact and still inside; such a space is regular
- LCH Urysohn cutoff
- Compact support, $C_c(X)$, and $C_0(X)$
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lynn Loomis, An Introduction to Abstract Harmonic Analysis, §§30–31 (standard reference, not scraped)