Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

KKT conditions and MFCQ for margin constraints

Definition

Let q1,…,qN:Rd→R be locally Lipschitz functions, with N,d≥1. Write ∂∘qi(θ) for the closed convex hull of limits of ordinary gradients at differentiability points approaching θ. The margin-constrained problem is to minimize 12∥θ∥22 subject to qi(θ)≥1 for every i. A point θ is feasible when all these inequalities hold; an index i is active at a feasible point when qi(θ)=1.

A feasible point θ is a Clarke KKT point if there are multipliers λi≥0 and vectors hi∈∂∘qi(θ) such that

θ=∑i=1Nλihi,λi(qi(θ)−1)=0(1≤i≤N).

A feasible point satisfies the Mangasarian–Fromovitz constraint qualification (MFCQ) in margin form if there is a direction v∈Rd such that ⟨hi,v⟩>0 for every active i and every hi∈∂∘qi(θ). If the same constraints are written gi(θ):=1−qi(θ)≤0, this condition is equivalently ⟨ki,v⟩<0 for every active i and ki∈∂∘gi(θ), since ∂∘gi(θ)=−∂∘qi(θ).

A feasible point is an (ε,δ)-approximate Clarke KKT point if there are λi≥0 and hi∈∂∘qi(θ) such that

∥θ−∑i=1Nλihi∥2≤ε,∑i=1Nλi(qi(θ)−1)≤δ,

where ε,δ>0. The second inequality measures total complementary-slackness error; every summand is nonnegative at a feasible point.

Remarks

The margin form fixes the sign convention for lower constraints qi≥1: a strict MFCQ direction increases every active margin. For upper constraints gi≤0, the corresponding active directional derivatives are negative. This sign convention is used in all local KKT arguments on this page.

The cited Lyu–Li Appendix C defines gi=1−qi≤0 but states MFCQ using positive directional derivatives of gi. This conflicts with its Lemma C.7: since ∂∘gi=−∂∘qi, homogeneity gives ⟨h,θ⟩=−Lqi(θ) for h∈∂∘gi(θ), not +Lqi(θ). The margin-form convention above is sign-consistent, and the assigned homogeneous MFCQ lemma proves its positive-direction claim directly.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources