Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Metacompactness: every open cover has a point-finite open refinement

Definition

A topological space X (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison) is metacompact when every open cover of X has a point-finite open refinement: for every open cover U of X there is a family V of open sets such that V covers X, every VV is contained in some UU, and every point of X belongs to only finitely many members of V (Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements).

Point-finiteness is the only new component. Refinement and covering are those of Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements; metacompactness weakens paracompactness (Paracompactness: every open cover has a locally finite open refinement, with no separation axiom built into the word) by asking the refining family to be point-finite rather than locally finite. Local finiteness implies point finiteness, so every paracompact space is metacompact, and no separation axiom is built into the word.

Remarks

  • Why this item exists on this page. The ZF countermodel of Stone's theorem on this page produces a metrizable space with an open cover that has no point-finite open refining cover; that is the precise failure, and it is what the relative-consistency theorem and the open-status remark state. (The empty family is a point-finite refinement in the bare containment sense, but it does not cover a nonempty space.) The word metacompact is used only as an abbreviation for that covering property.

  • Effectivity is a separate strengthening. A refinement is called effective when it comes equipped with a refinement map a:VU satisfying Va(V); the strengthening that every open cover of every discrete metric space has an effective point-finite open refinement is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice and is treated as its own theorem below, not as part of this definition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources