How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Metacompactness: every open cover has a point-finite open refinement
Definition
A topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison) is metacompact when every open cover of has a point-finite open refinement: for every open cover of there is a family of open sets such that covers , every is contained in some , and every point of belongs to only finitely many members of (Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements).
Point-finiteness is the only new component. Refinement and covering are those of Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements; metacompactness weakens paracompactness (Paracompactness: every open cover has a locally finite open refinement, with no separation axiom built into the word) by asking the refining family to be point-finite rather than locally finite. Local finiteness implies point finiteness, so every paracompact space is metacompact, and no separation axiom is built into the word.
Remarks
-
Why this item exists on this page. The ZF countermodel of Stone's theorem on this page produces a metrizable space with an open cover that has no point-finite open refining cover; that is the precise failure, and it is what the relative-consistency theorem and the open-status remark state. (The empty family is a point-finite refinement in the bare containment sense, but it does not cover a nonempty space.) The word metacompact is used only as an abbreviation for that covering property.
-
Effectivity is a separate strengthening. A refinement is called effective when it comes equipped with a refinement map satisfying ; the strengthening that every open cover of every discrete metric space has an effective point-finite open refinement is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice and is treated as its own theorem below, not as part of this definition.
Depends on
Used by
- False: BPI proves Stone's theorem for metric spaces False statement
- Corson's rational metric space is not metacompact Lemma
- Corson's Stone obstruction is ordinal boundable Lemma
- The exact choice strength of Stone's theorem remains open Remark
- Effective metacompactness for discrete metric spaces implies AC Theorem
- Relative consistency of BPI with failure of Stone's theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. Good, I. J. Tree, and W. S. Watson, On Stone's theorem and the axiom of choice (standard reference, not scraped)