How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weighted RT background interface for Mod(C)
Definition
Suppose a modular ribbon fusion category satisfies the hypotheses of The weighted Reshetikhin–Turaev TQFT and modular-functor factorization, including its weighted-Lagrangian bordism convention and proved state-space, composition, and factorization maps. The weighted RT background interface for the present page means using those TQFT state spaces and bordism maps as a separate 2+1-dimensional mathematical background alongside the algebraic defect 2-category . The interface asserts no canonical functor from a module category, module functor, or module-natural transformation to a physical defect, and no classification of 3+1-dimensional phases.
Remarks
The actual supplier The weighted Reshetikhin–Turaev TQFT and modular-functor factorization now proves the full marked weighted-Lagrangian RT functor and geometric factorization, including presentation/coupon independence, exact cap normalization, signature–Maslov composition, cylinders, duality, disconnected and empty cases, and both sewing inverses. Its weight action is for the prescribed composition, with the actual cap-reference correction for arbitrary real object Lagrangians. This establishes the background used in the Definition for every category satisfying the stated modular hypotheses. Full AC enters through the boundary duality/topology suppliers and countable choice through framed coupon evaluation. The algebraic construction remains independently defined; no canonical physical realization or phase classification is inferred.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Douglas and Reutter, Fusion 2-Categories and a State-Sum Invariant for 4-Manifolds, Construction 2.1.19 (algebraic background) (standard reference, not scraped)