How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morphisms, polarizability and simplicity of rational Hodge structures
Definition
With the conventions of Compact Kähler and rational Hodge polarization conventions, all structures in this item are rational pure Hodge structures , , of one fixed weight ; write for the -linear extension of a -linear map.
A morphism of Hodge structures is a -linear map whose -linear extension satisfies Kernels and images of such a morphism are again rational sub-Hodge structures: writing with , the relation with forces for every , because the sum decomposition of is direct, so and is direct, since and the target bidegrees of a direct sum are distinct, so The direct sum is the Hodge structure of the same weight with , the inclusions and projections being morphisms.
A short exact sequence of Hodge structures of weight consists of morphisms that are exact as a sequence of -vector spaces. It splits in the category of Hodge structures if admits a morphism with . A Hodge structure is polarizable if it admits a polarization, and simple if and it has no nonzero proper rational sub-Hodge structure, that is, no -subspace with and .
Remarks
- This item records, in the pure weight- case, the morphism, direct-sum, short-exact-sequence, polarizability and simplicity vocabulary of Deligne's -Hodge structures, Théorie de Hodge II, (2.1.10)-(2.1.17) and (2.2.1); the orthogonal splitting of polarized Hodge structures is proved on this page. It is deliberately not routed through the mixed Hodge structures of another page of this build, which lie outside this page's prerequisite closure.
- The only assertions recorded beyond the definitions are the componentwise closure claims for kernels and images, checked in the Definition above by the directness of the bidegree decompositions; no proof phase applies to a definition. Choice-free: the item fixes definitions and verifies componentwise linear algebra over a fixed finite-dimensional structure, and no choice principle is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pierre Deligne, Théorie de Hodge II, Publications mathématiques de l'IHÉS 40 (1971), 5-57; (2.1.10)-(2.1.17), (2.2.1) and Lemme (4.2.3) (standard reference, not scraped)