How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nelson–Aalen, Kaplan–Meier, and Greenwood estimators
Definition
For a positive integer sample size , let , , be event and censoring times with right-censored observations as in Event-time observation, censoring, and truncation schemes, so and . The subject counting process and at-risk process are and . The endpoint convention makes left-continuous at : a subject is still at risk at the observed time, including a tied event and censoring time. Set and . Let be the finite counting measure of observed events on , with atom at each ; in particular, . Tied failures at contribute their full count and censorings at do not contribute to .
For , the Nelson–Aalen estimator is , where the integrand is defined to be zero when . The Kaplan–Meier estimator is . Each product is finite and a factor is zero if every subject at risk fails at that time. The target survival function is . If has density , is positive on the horizon, and , the continuous cumulative hazard is .
These inclusive endpoint formulas reduce to the usual formulas whenever . If has finite support , write ; the corresponding discrete cumulative hazard is . Under IID sampling, independent censoring, and positive risk probability at the support points, the Nelson–Aalen increments estimate these ; in general this discrete cumulative hazard is not .
A baseline event is included at ; if it occurs then , so a model contract requiring must exclude this case.
An empty event product is , and an empty Greenwood event sum is .
On a horizon where every event contribution has , the Greenwood variance estimate is . Greenwood's formula is used as a first-order asymptotic variance estimate when the sampling and censoring assumptions justify that approximation; the formula alone asserts no asymptotic result and is not an exact finite-sample variance identity. It is undefined when a contributing denominator is zero.
For each fixed , and are statistics of the observed sample in the sense of Statistics and estimators. Greenwood's formula is a measurable function on the measurable subset of the observed sample space where every contributing denominator is positive. Its zero extension , equal to on and elsewhere, is a statistic on the whole observed sample space. This extension assigns no Greenwood variance interpretation outside .
To verify measurability, scan indices and include only the first event observation at each distinct time in ; each inclusion condition uses finitely many Borel equalities and inequalities among the observed and . Risk and event counts are finite Borel sums. The finitely many positive-denominator tests make measurable; evaluating divisions only on their positive-denominator branches makes the sums, products, and zero extension Borel measurable.
Depends on
Used by
- Aalen–Johansen cumulative-incidence estimator Algorithm
- A hand Kaplan–Meier calculation and loss of tail support Example
- Crossing hazards with a zero observed logrank score Example
- Higher competing mortality lowers incidence in a two-time table Example
- Finite-support risk-set proportion limits Lemma
- Uniform convergence of the empirical right-censoring risk set Lemma
- Finite-support consistency of Nelson–Aalen and Kaplan–Meier Theorem
- Pointwise influence limit and Greenwood variance consistency Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 3: Kaplan-Meier (KM) Estimator, PDF pp. 1–12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 12: 1-Sample Problem: General Asymptotic Results, PDF pp. 5–14 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Qiqing Yu, Survival Analysis (Lecture Notes), §§4.2.1–4.2.2, PDF pp. 30–38 (standard reference, not scraped)
- NIST/SEMATECH Engineering Statistics Handbook, Chapter 8, §8.2.1.5, PDF pp. 103–104 (standard reference, not scraped)