How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A normalizing flow and its base density
Definition
Let , let be nonempty open sets, and let be a bijection such that both and are continuously differentiable. Here means totally differentiable at every point with continuous derivative matrix. Such a map is a global diffeomorphism. A finite composition of global diffeomorphisms between open subsets of is a normalizing flow.
A base density on is a Lebesgue-measurable function with . It defines the probability measure for Lebesgue-measurable .
For the model-measure construction, assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. The model measure on is for Borel . This value is defined because the inverse diffeomorphism maps Borel sets to Lebesgue-measurable sets under Countable Choice. When this measure has a Lebesgue density, that density is the model density.
Definition references
Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms — Total differentiability, continuous derivative matrices, and local diffeomorphisms.
The measure with density relative to — The measure defined by integrating a nonnegative measurable density.
The Axiom of Countable Choice () — Countable Choice is assumed for the model-measure construction.
Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable — Under Countable Choice, Borel subsets of Euclidean space are Lebesgue measurable.
A C^1 diffeomorphism maps Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets — A diffeomorphism sends Lebesgue-measurable sets to Lebesgue-measurable sets.
Depends on
- Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms
- The measure with density $f$ relative to $\mu$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is Lebesgue measurable
- A C^1 diffeomorphism maps Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets
Used by
- A full-dimensional flow cannot represent a line-supported law exactly Example
- A unit-scale affine coupling has a triangular Jacobian Example
- A diffeomorphic flow has the inverse-Jacobian density Theorem
- Positive densities with smooth conditional CDFs admit an exact triangular-flow representation Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- George Papamakarios, Eric Nalisnick, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference, arXiv:1912.02762v1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dan Sheldon, COMPSCI 688: Probabilistic Graphical Models, Lecture 23: Normalizing Flows (annotated course notes) (standard reference, not scraped)