Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The parabolic Kazhdan–Lusztig bases and polynomials

Definition

Retain the notation of The parabolic Hecke module and the antispherical standard basis and write the parabolic Kazhdan--Lusztig bases of Existence and uniqueness of the parabolic Kazhdan–Lusztig bases as

Cx=∑y≤x, y∈JWmy,x my,Dx=∑y≤x, y∈JWny,x ny,x∈JW,

with coefficients my,x,ny,x∈Z[v] supported on the lower Bruhat ideal, mx,x=nx,x=1 and my,x,ny,x∈vZ[v] for y<x.

The spherical parabolic Kazhdan--Lusztig polynomials are My,xJ(q):=v−ℓ(x)+ℓ(y)my,x,q=v−2, and the antispherical (sign) parabolic Kazhdan--Lusztig polynomials are Ny,xJ(q):=v−ℓ(x)+ℓ(y)ny,x. The parity and degree bounds established in Parabolic Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials are alternating sums of ordinary ones ↗ make these polynomials in q; that reduction theorem discharges the well-definedness asserted here and is recorded in justified_by. Values at v=1 are written my,x(1), ny,x(1).

Normalization dictionary. With Py,xJ(u) the parabolic polynomials of Deodhar (1987) attached to the subset J, one has My,xJ=Py−1,x−1J for u=−1 and Ny,xJ=Py−1,x−1J for u=q, in the index convention of Deodhar and of the anti-spherical category. Thus the spherical family is the u=−1 normalization and the antispherical family the u=q normalization; the two are not related by a unit.

Spherical reduction to ordinary coefficients. If WJ is finite with longest element w0J, then my,x=pw0Jy, w0Jxfor all y,x∈JW, where p is the coefficient of the ordinary Kazhdan--Lusztig basis of Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials in the classical q-normalization and H‾w=∑y≤wpy,wHy in the normalization of The normalized type-A Hecke algebra and its bar involution.

Remarks

  • Well-definedness. The coefficients my,x,ny,x exist and are unique by the parabolic basis theorem; the triangular support and the vanishing of my,x,ny,x for y≰x are part of that theorem. The assertions that the shifted coefficients are polynomials in q=v−2 (parity and degree bound) are not part of the existence theorem: they are proved in the alternating-sum reduction theorem Parabolic Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials are alternating sums of ordinary ones ↗, which is the recorded justification of this definition. No parity clause is read back into the existence theorem.
  • Both families are canonical-basis coefficients, not chosen representatives. Cx and Dx are the unique bar-fixed elements with triangular support of the parabolic basis theorem; the symbols my,x and ny,x are their standard-basis coefficients in MJ and NJ respectively.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources