How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compatibility, ccc and Knaster for posets
Definition
Let be a poset as in Partial order and partially ordered set, with stronger conditions smaller. Conditions are compatible if some satisfies and . Otherwise they are incompatible. A poset antichain is a set of pairwise incompatible conditions. The countable chain condition (ccc) says that every poset antichain is countable. The Knaster property says that every uncountable subset of has an uncountable subset consisting of pairwise compatible conditions. Countable includes finite, as in Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable.
Knaster implies ccc: if were an uncountable antichain, Knaster would give an uncountable pairwise compatible . Choose two distinct members of ; they would be both compatible and incompatible. Empty and countable posets satisfy both properties, because they have no uncountable subsets. A condition is compatible with itself, using itself as lower bound; singletons are therefore pairwise compatible and also antichains under the distinct-pair convention.
Incompatibility is stronger than incomparability in a general poset. For a tree , put iff , so a lower bound is a common tree extension. By Tree predecessors and compatibility, a common extension forces the two nodes comparable. Conversely, for comparable tree nodes the higher node extends both. Thus the two antichain notions coincide for this reverse tree order. The orientation of the order is essential to that identification.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite specializing conditions Definition
- Finite-support products Definition
- Under diamond, ccc fails to survive a square Example
- Finite products preserve Knaster Lemma
- A ccc tree poset whose square is not ccc Theorem
- Finite specialization of an Aronszajn tree is ccc Theorem
- Finite-support products of Knaster posets are Knaster Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.