How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A ccc tree poset whose square is not ccc
Statement
In ZFC, if is a normal splitting Suslin tree, then the poset , where iff , is ccc, whereas its coordinatewise square is not ccc.
For each parent , choose two distinct immediate successors . The map is injective and its image is an uncountable antichain in the square.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Such ; assume AC.
For the reverse order of a tree, poset compatibility is exactly tree comparability; ccc means no uncountable incompatible subset. Compatibility, ccc and Knaster for posets
In a finite product compatibility is coordinatewise. Finite-support products
Normality gives a unique root and splitting gives two distinct immediate successors at every height whose successor is below the tree height. Normal and splitting trees
A Suslin tree has height , countable levels, and no uncountable tree antichain. Aronszajn, Suslin and special trees
Common predecessors are comparable, and predecessors at a smaller height are unique; strict tree order increases height. Tree predecessors and compatibility
Assume AC. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
F1 identifies every poset antichain in with a tree antichain, which is countable by F4. Thus is ccc. Its root is greatest in the reverse order, since every node has that unique root below it by F5. Therefore F2 applies to its two-factor product.
Every has two distinct immediate successors, since ; choose an ordered pair simultaneously for all using F3 and A1. Each has height : a larger height would give an intermediate predecessor by F5. Define . This map is injective: equality of its first coordinates forces equal parent heights and then identical predecessors at that height by F5. The tree is uncountable, because its height map is onto (use height and F5 for nonempty levels) and a countable set cannot have uncountable image. Hence is uncountable.
For incomparable parents , the nodes cannot be comparable: a comparison would give a common extension of , forcing them comparable by F5. Thus these product pairs are incompatible by F1 and F2. For comparable distinct parents, interchange their names if necessary so that . Suppose both coordinates of were compatible. F1 and heights then give for . Both and are below , so are comparable by F5. Since , this forces . Unique predecessors at that height (or equality when heights coincide) would give , contrary to their choice. Hence at least one coordinate is incompatible, and F2 makes the product pairs incompatible. Thus is an uncountable product antichain, proving the square is not ccc.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.