Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A ccc tree poset whose square is not ccc

Statement

In ZFC, if T is a normal splitting Suslin tree, then the poset P=(T,P), where pPq iff qTp, is ccc, whereas its coordinatewise square P×P is not ccc.

For each parent t, choose two distinct immediate successors t0,t1. The map t(t0,t1) is injective and its image is an uncountable antichain in the square.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Such T; assume AC.

[F1]

For the reverse order of a tree, poset compatibility is exactly tree comparability; ccc means no uncountable incompatible subset. Compatibility, ccc and Knaster for posets

[F2]

In a finite product compatibility is coordinatewise. Finite-support products

[F3]

Normality gives a unique root and splitting gives two distinct immediate successors at every height whose successor is below the tree height. Normal and splitting trees

[F4]

A Suslin tree has height ω1, countable levels, and no uncountable tree antichain. Aronszajn, Suslin and special trees

[F5]

Common predecessors are comparable, and predecessors at a smaller height are unique; strict tree order increases height. Tree predecessors and compatibility

[A1]

Proof

1.1

F1 identifies every poset antichain in P with a tree antichain, which is countable by F4. Thus P is ccc. Its root is greatest in the reverse order, since every node has that unique root below it by F5. Therefore F2 applies to its two-factor product.

F1F2F3F4F5given
1.2

Every tT has two distinct immediate successors, since ht(t)+1<ω1; choose an ordered pair (t0,t1) simultaneously for all t using F3 and A1. Each has height ht(t)+1: a larger height would give an intermediate predecessor by F5. Define e(t)=(t0,t1). This map is injective: equality of its first coordinates forces equal parent heights and then identical predecessors at that height by F5. The tree is uncountable, because its height map is onto ω1 (use height and F5 for nonempty levels) and a countable set cannot have uncountable image. Hence e[T] is uncountable.

F3F4F5A1given
2.1

For incomparable parents t,u, the nodes t0,u0 cannot be comparable: a comparison would give a common extension of t,u, forcing them comparable by F5. Thus these product pairs are incompatible by F1 and F2. For comparable distinct parents, interchange their names if necessary so that t<Tu. Suppose both coordinates of e(t),e(u) were compatible. F1 and heights then give tiTui for i=0,1. Both ti and u are below ui, so are comparable by F5. Since ht(ti)=ht(t)+1ht(u), this forces tiTu. Unique predecessors at that height (or equality when heights coincide) would give t0=t1, contrary to their choice. Hence at least one coordinate is incompatible, and F2 makes the product pairs incompatible. Thus e[T] is an uncountable product antichain, proving the square is not ccc.

F1F2F5step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources