How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tree predecessors and compatibility
Statement
Each node in a tree has exactly one predecessor of each height . If , then are comparable. Strict tree order strictly increases height, and every level is an antichain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A tree with the strict and reflexive order conventions just defined.
The strict predecessors are well-ordered and is their ordinal order type. Set-theoretic trees, heights, levels, branches and antichains
Proof
Let and let be its order isomorphism. For , transitivity and order reflection give . Thus . Conversely every predecessor is for exactly one and has height , proving existence and uniqueness.
If and either equals , they are comparable. Otherwise both belong to the well-ordered set , so its linear order compares them. This includes .
If , step 1.1 puts at some , so . Distinct nodes of one level therefore cannot be comparable; each level is an antichain. For a root the predecessor assertion has no indices, and empty levels satisfy the antichain assertion vacuously.
Depends on
Used by
- Compatibility, ccc and Knaster for posets Definition
- A club of correctly coded maximal-antichain restrictions Lemma
- Branches through countable normal trees of limit height Lemma
- Normal trees have faithful sequence representations Lemma
- Rational bounds at countable limit levels Lemma
- Seal a maximal antichain at a countable limit level Lemma
- Splitting turns an uncountable branch into an antichain Lemma
- Two finite disjoint petals can be made cross-incomparable Lemma
- A ccc tree poset whose square is not ccc Theorem
- Diamond constructs a normal splitting Suslin tree Theorem
- König’s lemma for finite levels Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Monk, Set theory following Jech (2024), Chapter 9, printed p65 (tree terminology; normality conventions adapted) (standard reference, not scraped)