Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective–module Hom pairing on class generators

Statement

Let k be a field and A a finite-dimensional unital k-algebra. For a finite-dimensional projective left A-module P and finite-dimensional left A-module M, define the object-level value

h(P,M):=dim⁡kHom⁡A(P,M).

If A is Z-graded and P,M are finite-dimensional graded left A-modules, with P projective in the degree-zero graded category, define

hgr(P,M):=∑d∈Zvddim⁡kHom⁡A,d(P,M),

where Hom⁡A,d(P,M) consists of A-linear maps sending each Pi into Mi+d. These are candidate values on object isomorphism classes; no descent to pairings on K0×G0 is asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field k, the finite-dimensional unital algebra A, and the finite-dimensional projective and module objects specified in the Statement. In the graded case, all module maps are A-linear and homogeneous when a degree is specified. No axiom of choice is used.

[F1]

G0 is generated by isomorphism classes of objects modulo the short-exact-sequence relations (Grothendieck group of an essentially small abelian category).

[F2]

The split Grothendieck group is generated by isomorphism classes of projectives modulo direct-sum relations (Split Grothendieck group of an additive category).

[F3]

The graded groups carry the Laurent action with vd[M]=[M{d}] and vd[P]=[P{d}] (Graded Grothendieck groups, shift action, and Cartan map).

[F4]

For graded modules, Hom⁡A,d(P,M) is the group of A-linear maps satisfying f(Pi)⊆Mi+d for every i (Graded balanced tensor product and homogeneous Hom).

[F5]

The scalar action of k on a graded k-algebra is central (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).

[F6]

Lk(V,W) is a k-vector space under pointwise addition and scalar multiplication (L(V,W) is a vector space over the common scalar field).

[F7]

If V,W are finite-dimensional k-vector spaces, then Lk(V,W) is finite-dimensional, with dimension (dim⁡kV)(dim⁡kW) (dim⁡FMm×n(F)=mn and dim⁡FL(V,W)=(dim⁡FV)(dim⁡FW) for finite-dimensional V,W).

[F8]

The homogeneous components of a graded left A-module are k-modules (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F5F6F7givenalgebra

Every A-linear map between left A-modules is k-linear: for λ∈k, centrality of the scalar action gives f(λp)=f((λ1A)p)=(λ1A)f(p)=λf(p). Sums and scalar multiples of A-linear maps remain A-linear, so Hom⁡A(P,M) is a k-vector subspace of Lk(P,M). Since P,M are finite-dimensional, [F7] makes the ambient linear-map space finite-dimensional, and hence Hom⁡A(P,M) is finite-dimensional. Thus h(P,M) is defined in Z.

1.2F4F5F6F7F8givenalgebra

Each Hom⁡A,d(P,M) is also a k-vector subspace of Lk(P,M): the A-linearity and degree-d conditions are preserved by addition and scalar multiplication, using [F4], [F5], and [F8]. Therefore every such homogeneous Hom space is finite-dimensional by [F6] and [F7].

2.1F3F4step 1.2givenchoosealgebra

The supports IP:={i:Pi≠0} and IM:={j:Mj≠0} are finite. Indeed, if a finite-dimensional graded space had more than n nonzero components, where n is its dimension, choosing one nonzero vector in each of n+1 distinct components would give n+1 linearly independent vectors; this is only a finite selection. If Hom⁡A,d(P,M)≠0, choose a nonzero map f in it. Since f is nonzero, some p∈P has f(p)≠0. Decompose p into its finitely many homogeneous components. As f is homogeneous and f(p)≠0, at least one component pi∈Pi has f(pi)≠0. Then i∈IP and i+d∈IM, so d∈IM−IP. This difference set is finite, hence only finitely many terms in hgr(P,M) can be nonzero. The exponent is this map degree d, consistent with the internal-shift normalization vd[M]=[M{d}] in [F3]. The formula is therefore a Laurent polynomial in Z[v,v−1]. If either module is zero, all homogeneous Hom spaces vanish and the sum is zero.

2.2F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra

If α:P→P′ and β:M→M′ are module isomorphisms, then f↦βfα−1 is a k-linear isomorphism Hom⁡A(P,M)→Hom⁡A(P′,M′). For graded isomorphisms of degree zero it restricts, for every d, to an isomorphism of Hom⁡A,d spaces, since degree-zero maps preserve each homogeneous component. Hence both candidate values depend only on the object isomorphism classes.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2construct

The formulas in the Statement thus give well-defined functions on pairs of object isomorphism classes, with values in Z and Z[v,v−1], respectively.

4.1F1F2given∎

The groups in [F1] and [F2] impose additional short-exact-sequence and direct-sum relations. This Definition specifies only the object-level values; it makes no claim that they are additive for those relations or descend to K0×G0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources