How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective–module Hom pairing on class generators
Statement
Let be a field and a finite-dimensional unital -algebra. For a finite-dimensional projective left -module and finite-dimensional left -module , define the object-level value
If is -graded and are finite-dimensional graded left -modules, with projective in the degree-zero graded category, define
where consists of -linear maps sending each into . These are candidate values on object isomorphism classes; no descent to pairings on is asserted here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field , the finite-dimensional unital algebra , and the finite-dimensional projective and module objects specified in the Statement. In the graded case, all module maps are -linear and homogeneous when a degree is specified. No axiom of choice is used.
is generated by isomorphism classes of objects modulo the short-exact-sequence relations (Grothendieck group of an essentially small abelian category).
The split Grothendieck group is generated by isomorphism classes of projectives modulo direct-sum relations (Split Grothendieck group of an additive category).
The graded groups carry the Laurent action with and (Graded Grothendieck groups, shift action, and Cartan map).
For graded modules, is the group of -linear maps satisfying for every (Graded balanced tensor product and homogeneous Hom).
The scalar action of on a graded -algebra is central (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).
is a -vector space under pointwise addition and scalar multiplication ( is a vector space over the common scalar field).
If are finite-dimensional -vector spaces, then is finite-dimensional, with dimension ( and for finite-dimensional ).
The homogeneous components of a graded left -module are -modules (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).
Proof
Every -linear map between left -modules is -linear: for , centrality of the scalar action gives . Sums and scalar multiples of -linear maps remain -linear, so is a -vector subspace of . Since are finite-dimensional, [F7] makes the ambient linear-map space finite-dimensional, and hence is finite-dimensional. Thus is defined in .
Each is also a -vector subspace of : the -linearity and degree- conditions are preserved by addition and scalar multiplication, using [F4], [F5], and [F8]. Therefore every such homogeneous Hom space is finite-dimensional by [F6] and [F7].
The supports and are finite. Indeed, if a finite-dimensional graded space had more than nonzero components, where is its dimension, choosing one nonzero vector in each of distinct components would give linearly independent vectors; this is only a finite selection. If , choose a nonzero map in it. Since is nonzero, some has . Decompose into its finitely many homogeneous components. As is homogeneous and , at least one component has . Then and , so . This difference set is finite, hence only finitely many terms in can be nonzero. The exponent is this map degree , consistent with the internal-shift normalization in [F3]. The formula is therefore a Laurent polynomial in . If either module is zero, all homogeneous Hom spaces vanish and the sum is zero.
If and are module isomorphisms, then is a -linear isomorphism . For graded isomorphisms of degree zero it restricts, for every , to an isomorphism of spaces, since degree-zero maps preserve each homogeneous component. Hence both candidate values depend only on the object isomorphism classes.
The formulas in the Statement thus give well-defined functions on pairs of object isomorphism classes, with values in and , respectively.
The groups in [F1] and [F2] impose additional short-exact-sequence and direct-sum relations. This Definition specifies only the object-level values; it makes no claim that they are additive for those relations or descend to .
Depends on
- Graded Grothendieck groups, shift action, and Cartan map
- Graded balanced tensor product and homogeneous Hom
- Grothendieck group of an essentially small abelian category
- Split Grothendieck group of an additive category
- Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts
- The space $\mathcal L(V,W)$ of linear maps with pointwise addition and scalar multiplication
- $\mathcal L(V,W)$ is a vector space over the common scalar field
- $\dim_F M_{m\times n}(F)=mn$ and $\dim_F\mathcal L(V,W)=(\dim_FV)(\dim_FW)$ for finite-dimensional $V,W$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander Kleshchev, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups and Related Hecke Algebras, §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)