How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Feynman–Kitaev history Hamiltonian
Definition
Let a verifier circuit have gates , each acting on at most two computation qubits, with its accept/reject predicate reversibly computed into one output qubit (accept is ). Let and encode time by the unary clock word on clock qubits. For an initial computation vector define its history vector where the product is . Orthogonality of the clock words and unitarity give ; this history is normalized exactly when . For each propagation edge , let be the local clock patterns which have on their smallest common window: for these are on ; for they are on ; for they are on ; and for they are on . Define where each clock ket is only on the displayed local window. For each local pre/post block, its quadratic form is one half the squared norm of the difference between the post component and applied to the pre component, so it is positive semidefinite. On legal clock words these patterns identify exactly the adjacent times . Put . Define Here indexes initially zero verifier workspace qubits, and the output predicate is computed into the displayed accept qubit. The history Hamiltonian is the positive sum . A propagation term uses at most two computation and three clock qubits; each other summand uses at most two qubits.
Depends on
Used by
- One-gate history Hamiltonian energy check Example
- Geometric soundness bound for a history Hamiltonian Lemma
- Input and output penalties on history states Lemma
- KKR restriction to correctly initialized witness histories Lemma
- KKR restriction to legal unary clocks Lemma
- Propagation kernel and path-Laplacian gap Lemma
- Unary clock legality and 5-locality Lemma
- 5-Local Hamiltonian is QMA-complete Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dorit Aharonov and Tomer Naveh, Quantum NP: A Survey (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)
- Julia Kempe, Alexei Kitaev, and Oded Regev, The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem (standard reference, not scraped)