How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular two-level fractions, signed defining relations, and resolution
Definition
Fix integers and , and put . Let with addition and multiplication modulo . For a factor subset , its incidence vector has coordinate at exactly when . Choose subsets whose incidence vectors are linearly independent over , and choose signs . Using the run space and product columns of Two-level full factorial designs and coded effects, define the regular fraction
The corresponding design is called a regular fractional factorial; The defining subgroup gives the exact alias relations ↗ proves that has exactly runs, including the case with one run. The choices are alternate fractions and are part of the definition.
A signed word is a pair with and . It evaluates at as and multiplies by
The identity word is . The signed generator evaluates to on . The defining subgroup is generated by ; the alias theorem proves it is exactly the subgroup of signed words that evaluate to on every run in .
For , their restricted sign columns are equal-column aliases when for every . They are signed aliases with sign when on every run; sign is the equal-column case and sign records opposite columns. The alias theorem gives the exact criterion for each sign.
The word length of is , the number of factor letters, independent of . The resolution is the minimum among nonidentity words ; it is written as a Roman numeral. Since and the generators are independent, has a nonidentity word of nonzero length.
Remarks
- Equal or opposite design columns make the corresponding unrestricted linear-model coefficients nonseparable; see Aliased factorial columns prevent separate coefficient identification. A hierarchy or sparsity premise is an additional modeling assumption, not a consequence of the fraction.
- The resolution records only the shortest defining word. It does not describe the complete alias structure; that is given by the whole subgroup .
Sources
Oehlert §§18.2 and 18.4 and NIST/SEMATECH §§5.3.3.4.2–5.3.3.4.4 support the generator, signed-relation, and resolution conventions. The run count and exact subgroup characterization are proved locally in the justified-by theorem.
Depends on
Used by
- Central composite designs Definition
- Full and targeted foldovers of a resolution III fraction Example
- The alias classes in a 2³⁻¹ fraction Example
- Aliased factorial columns prevent separate coefficient identification Theorem
- Full and partial foldovers separate aliases by parity Theorem
- The defining subgroup gives the exact alias relations Theorem
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gary W. Oehlert, A First Course in Design and Analysis of Experiments, Chapter 18, §§18.2 and 18.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, §§5.3.3.4.2–5.3.3.4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)