Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative property (T) for a pair and relative Kazhdan pairs

Statement

Let G be a topological group and let H≤G be any subgroup (Subgroup), not assumed normal or closed. The pair (G,H) has relative property (T) if every strongly continuous unitary representation of G (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners) with almost invariant vectors (Almost invariant vectors for a unitary representation) has a nonzero vector fixed by every π(h) for h∈H.

A pair (Q,ε) with Q⊆G and ε>0 is a relative Kazhdan pair for (G,H) if every strongly continuous unitary representation of G having a (Q,ε)-invariant unit vector has a nonzero H-invariant vector. A subset Q⊆G is a relative Kazhdan set if (Q,ε) is a relative Kazhdan pair for some ε>0.

When H=G, these are respectively Kazhdan's property (T), Kazhdan pairs, and Kazhdan sets (Kazhdan's property (T), Kazhdan pairs, Kazhdan sets and Kazhdan constants).

Remarks

  • The zero-space representation has no unit vectors and no almost invariant vectors, so it creates no exception to either implication.
  • If H={e}, every vector is H-invariant; hence (G,{e}) has relative property (T), and every (Q,ε) is a relative Kazhdan pair.
  • The subgroup need not be normal for H-invariant vectors or for the relative pair definition to make sense. Closedness is a hypothesis in the cited KHV formulation, but the definitions stated here also make sense for a nonclosed subgroup.
  • No local compactness, Hausdorffness, countability, or choice assumption is part of these definitions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources