Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Almost invariant vectors for a unitary representation

Definition

Let G be a topological group and let (π,H) be a strongly continuous unitary representation of G (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners) on a Hilbert space H (Hilbert space). For a subset Q⊆G and a real number ε>0, a vector ξ∈H is (Q,ε)-invariant if ∥π(x)ξ−ξ∥<ε∥ξ∥for every x∈Q. The condition is vacuous when Q=∅; the definition of almost invariant vectors below still tests the compact singleton containing the identity. For Q={e}, every unit vector is (Q,ε)-invariant because π(e)=I. The representation π has almost invariant vectors if for every compact Q⊆G (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right) and every ε>0, it has a (Q,ε)-invariant unit vector. The representation has a nonzero invariant vector if there is ξ≠0 such that π(g)ξ=ξ for every g∈G. In particular, the zero representation has no almost invariant vectors because it has no unit vectors. For a nonzero ξ, the (Q,ε)-condition is unchanged by multiplying ξ by a nonzero scalar, so it may be normalized to a unit vector.

Remarks

For any topological group, almost invariant vectors imply 1G≺π in the finite-sum coefficient sense of Weak containment of unitary representations. Indeed, every coefficient of the trivial representation is a nonnegative constant c. If c>0, choose a unit vector ξ that is (Q,δ)-invariant, where δ=η/c for a requested approximation tolerance η>0, and use c ξ as a vector for π. For every x∈Q, Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∣c−⟨π(x)(c ξ),c ξ⟩∣=c∣⟨ξ−π(x)ξ,ξ⟩∣≤c∥π(x)ξ−ξ∥<η. This diagonal coefficient is continuous and of positive type by Matrix coefficient of a unitary representation and Diagonal unitary coefficients have positive type, so it is an allowed one-term approximant; the zero coefficient (c=0) is represented by the zero vector. No choice is used, since a witness is selected separately for each given compact set and tolerance.

When G is locally compact Hausdorff (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) and AC is assumed (The Axiom of Choice), Weak containment of the trivial representation and almost invariant vectors proves the converse as well: 1G≺π is equivalent to almost invariant vectors. Under AC, the converse fails for general topological groups; that published lemma gives a counterexample in its final remarks, using Tychonoff and recursive compact-stage neighbourhood selections. The LCH equivalence and that counterexample are the two assertions invoked here under AC; the definition and the forward implication above are choice-free.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources