Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weak containment of the trivial representation and almost invariant vectors

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be an LCH group, let 1G denote the trivial representation on C (1G(g)z=z, a strongly continuous unitary representation) and let π be a strongly continuous unitary representation of G on a Hilbert space H (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners). Then 1G≺π (Weak containment of unitary representations) if and only if for every compact Q⊆G and every ϵ>0 there is a unit vector ξ∈H with sup⁡g∈Q∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥<ϵ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; an LCH group G; the trivial representation 1G on C; a strongly continuous unitary representation π on H.

[F1]

1G is irreducible (its space is one-dimensional) and its diagonal coefficient at the unit vector 1∈C is the constant function 1; the functions of positive type associated to 1G are exactly the nonnegative constants c≥0, and finite sums of them are again of this form (Weak containment of unitary representations, Continuous positive-type functions and normalization, Matrix coefficient of a unitary representation).

[F2]

If ξ is a unit vector and g∈G, then ∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥2=2(1−Re⁡⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩) and, by Cauchy-Schwarz applied to ⟨ξ−π(g)ξ,ξ⟩, ∣1−⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩∣≤∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥ (Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs).

[F3]

Normalized coefficient approximation: if ϕ is a normalized function of positive type associated to an irreducible representation π0 and π0≺π, then for every compact Q and ϵ>0 there is a unit vector η with sup⁡g∈Q∣ϕ(g)−⟨π(g)η,η⟩∣<ϵ (Normalized coefficient approximation for irreducible weak containment).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC, an LCH group G, the trivial representation 1G and a strongly continuous unitary representation π on H.

1.1F2

If H=0, both conditions fail on the compact set {e}: its only coefficient is 0 and it has no unit vector. For every unit vector ξ∈H and every g∈G the invariant-vector defect and the coefficient are related by ∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥2=2(1−Re⁡⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩), hence 2(1−Re⁡⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩)≤2∣1−⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩∣ and ∣1−⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩∣≤∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥.

2.1F1step 1.1

Almost invariant vectors imply 1G≺π. Suppose that for every compact Q and ϵ>0 there is a unit ξ with sup⁡Q∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥<ϵ; given Q,ϵ, choose such ξ for Q and ϵ. Then for g∈Q, ∣1−⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩∣≤∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥<ϵ by step 1.1, so the constant function 1, the normalized coefficient of 1G, is approximated on Q by the single function of positive type ⟨π(⋅)ξ,ξ⟩ associated to π; multiplying ξ by c approximates c≥0 in the same way, so every function of positive type associated to 1G (a nonnegative constant by [F1]) is a compact-uniform limit of finite sums of functions of positive type associated to π. This is exactly 1G≺π.

2.2F1F3step 1.1

1G≺π implies almost invariant vectors. Assume 1G≺π, let Q be compact and ϵ>0. Since 1G is irreducible with normalized coefficient the constant function 1 by [F1], [F3] provides a unit vector ξ∈H with sup⁡Q∣1−⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩∣<ϵ2/2. For g∈Q step 1.1 gives ∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥2=2(1−Re⁡⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩)≤2∣1−⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩∣<ϵ2, hence sup⁡Q∥π(g)ξ−ξ∥<ϵ.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove the equivalence. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the normalized-coefficient approximation lemma; the estimates in step 1.1 and the passage to nonnegative multiples are choice-free (The Axiom of Choice).

Remarks

The LCH hypothesis cannot be dropped for the finite-sum coefficient definition of weak containment used here. Let Kk={(gd)d≥1∈∏d≥1U(d):rank⁡(gd−I)≤k for every d}. The group U(d) is closed and bounded in Cd2≅R2d2, since g∗g=I is a closed condition and each entry has modulus at most one; it is therefore compact by A subset of Rn with the product topology is compact exactly when it is closed and bounded, the product topology being the Euclidean metric topology. Each complex rank condition is closed: the real matrix of a complex-linear map has twice its complex rank (its image is the realification of the complex image), so use the vanishing of all (2k+1)-minors of the real matrix, by A matrix has rank at least r exactly when it has a nonzero r-rowed minor; the condition is vacuous when k≥d. Thus every Kk is compact by Tychonoff's theorem: an arbitrary product of compact spaces is compact in the product topology, assuming the Axiom of Choice. Put G=⋃k≥1Kk with the final topology of this increasing compact sequence. It is Hausdorff, since that topology contains the ambient product topology. The finite-product theorem for these direct limits (Gloeckner--Gramlich--Hartnick, Proposition 4.7, printed pp. 12--13) identifies G×G with lim→⁡(Kk×Kk). Indeed every compact Hausdorff stage is a kω space, using its constant compact exhaustion. Coordinatewise multiplication restricts continuously to Kk×Kk→K2k because gg′−I=(g−I)+g(g′−I) and ranks are subadditive; inversion preserves Kk because g−1−I=−g−1(g−I). Thus G is a Hausdorff topological group.

Every compact subset of G lies in one Kk. Otherwise choose distinct points xn of that compact subset outside Kn. Every subset of {xn:n≥1} has finite, hence closed, intersection with each Kk, so is closed in the final topology. This would give an infinite closed discrete subspace of a compact Hausdorff space, a contradiction. The representation ρ=⨁^d≥1Cd with coordinatewise standard action is strongly continuous: each orbit map is continuous in the ambient product topology by truncating its square-summable tail, hence in the finer final topology (Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations).

The functions ϕd(g)=d−1tr⁡(gd) are finite sums of diagonal coefficients of ρ, using the vectors d−1/2e1,…,d−1/2ed in the dth summand. By Complex spectral theorem: a normal endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis, and conversely, a unitary has an orthonormal eigenbasis; all eigenvalues have modulus one, and rank⁡(gd−I)≤k allows at most k nonidentity eigenvalues. Hence sup⁡Kk∣1−ϕd∣≤2k/d. Compact containment therefore gives 1G≺ρ. However, K1 is compact, and for any unit vector ξ=(ξd) choose gd to act as −I on Cξd and as I on its orthogonal complement when ξd≠0, and to be the identity otherwise. Then g∈K1 and ρ(g)ξ=−ξ, so sup⁡g∈K1∥ρ(g)ξ−ξ∥=2. There are no almost invariant unit vectors. This proves that the general topological-group version of the equivalence is false.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources