Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalized coefficient approximation for irreducible weak containment

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be an LCH group, let π be an irreducible strongly continuous unitary representation of G and let ρ be a strongly continuous unitary representation with π≺ρ (Weak containment of unitary representations, Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners). Then ρ is nonzero, and for every normalized function of positive type ϕ associated to π (that is, ϕ(g)=⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩ with ∥ξ∥=1, Continuous positive-type functions and normalization, Matrix coefficient of a unitary representation), every compact Q⊆G and every ϵ>0 there is a unit vector η∈Hρ with sup⁡g∈Q∣ϕ(g)−⟨ρ(g)η,η⟩∣<ϵ. Thus a normalized coefficient of π is a compact-uniform limit of single normalized coefficients of ρ, not merely of finite sums of them.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; an LCH group G; an irreducible unitary representation π; a unitary representation ρ with π≺ρ; a normalized function of positive type ϕ associated to π.

[F1]

Every diagonal coefficient has φ(e)=∥ξ∥2 and ∣φ(g)∣≤∥ξ∥2, so a normalized one satisfies ϕ(e)=1; weak containment π≺ρ requires every function of positive type associated to π to be approximated uniformly on compacta by finite sums of functions of positive type associated to ρ (Weak containment of unitary representations, Continuous positive-type functions and normalization, Matrix coefficient of a unitary representation).

[F2]

Family selection: if (ρs)s∈S is a set-indexed family of nonzero unitary representations and π≺⨁^s∈Sρs for an irreducible π, then for every unit ξ∈Hπ, compact Q and ϵ>0 there are s∈S and a unit vector η∈Hρs with sup⁡Q∣⟨π(g)ξ,ξ⟩−⟨ρs(g)η,η⟩∣<ϵ (Irreducible weak containment in a family selects one coefficient, Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC, an LCH group G, an irreducible unitary representation π, a unitary representation ρ with π≺ρ, and a normalized positive-type function ϕ associated to π.

1.1F1

ρ is nonzero. If Hρ={0}, then the only function of positive type associated to ρ is 0, so no finite sum of such functions can be within 1/2 of ϕ on the compact set {e}, where ϕ(e)=1 by [F1]; this contradicts π≺ρ.

2.1F2step 1.1

The approximation holds. Apply [F2] to the singleton family S={0} with ρ0:=ρ, whose direct sum is ρ itself: since π≺ρ and ρ is nonzero by step 1.1, for the unit vector ξ with ϕ=⟨π(⋅)ξ,ξ⟩, the compact set Q and the given ϵ, there are s∈S and a unit vector η∈Hρs=Hρ with sup⁡Q∣ϕ(g)−⟨ρ(g)η,η⟩∣<ϵ, which is the assertion.

3.1givenF1∎

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the family-selection lemma; the singleton specialization, the positivity of ϕ and the normalization at e use no further choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources