How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Property (T) implies compact generation
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a locally compact Hausdorff topological group (Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous, Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) with Kazhdan's property (T) (Kazhdan's property (T)). Then is compactly generated (Compactly generated locally compact groups). In particular, a discrete group with property (T) is finitely generated.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a locally compact Hausdorff topological group with property (T).
Property (T) says that every strongly continuous unitary representation with almost invariant vectors has a nonzero invariant vector (Kazhdan's property (T), Almost invariant vectors for a unitary representation, Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners, Hilbert space).
Every point of has a compact neighborhood, and such a neighborhood contains an open set containing that point (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
A subgroup is compactly generated when it is generated as an abstract group by a compact subset (Compactly generated locally compact groups, The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups, Subgroup).
Every open subgroup of a topological group is closed because its complement is a union of open left cosets; a closed subgroup of the locally compact Hausdorff group is locally compact Hausdorff (Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous, Left and right cosets and of a subgroup, In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure).
Every cover of a compact subset by ambient open sets has a finite subcover (A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it). A finite union of compact subsets is compact (A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact), and every finite subset is compact (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
For each open subgroup , the quasi-regular representation on is strongly continuous and unitary, has -fixed unit vector , and its -invariant subspace is nonzero exactly when is finite (Quasi-regular representations on discrete coset spaces).
Under AC, a set-indexed family of strongly continuous unitary representations has a strongly continuous Hilbert direct sum, with componentwise action and isometric coordinate embeddings (Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations, The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette prove this in Theorem 1.3.1, printed pp. 41–42. The proof below retains their single-coordinate vector in the direct sum and proves the compact-subgroup covering and quasi-regular interfaces locally.
Proof technique: if is not compactly generated, use quasi-regular representations over all open compactly generated subgroups to build an almost-invariant representation with no invariant vector.
Let be the set of open compactly generated subgroups of ; it is a set because it is a subcollection of . It covers : for , choose a compact neighborhood of and an open with by [F2]. The subgroup contains the nonempty open set ; if , then is an open identity neighborhood contained in , and is open. It is locally compact Hausdorff by [F4], and is a compact generator, so and .
For any compact , the compact set is covered by the open subgroups in by step 1.1. Take a finite subcover with by [F5], and for each take a compact generating set for by [F3]. The finite union is compact, and contains every ; because it contains the open subgroup , it is open and locally compact Hausdorff by [F4]. Thus and .
Suppose for contradiction that is not compactly generated. Then every has infinite index: if were finite, adjoining finitely many left coset representatives to a compact generating set of would give a compact set by [F5] generating by [F3]. By [F6], each quasi-regular representation has no nonzero -invariant vector. Form the Hilbert direct sum ; this is a strongly continuous unitary representation by [F7]. Its invariant vectors are coordinatewise invariant, so has no nonzero invariant vector.
For every compact , choose containing by step 2.1. The vector in its coordinate of is a unit vector fixed by every by [F6]. Therefore has almost invariant vectors.
By property (T) and [F1], has a nonzero invariant vector. At least one coordinate of this vector is nonzero, and that coordinate is -invariant in some ; [F6] then says that is finite. The finite-index argument in step 2.2 makes compactly generated, contradicting the assumption there. Hence is compactly generated.
If is discrete, every compact subset is finite: the cover of a compact subset by its open singletons has a finite subcover by [F5]. A compact generating subset supplied by step 4.1 is therefore finite, so is finitely generated.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Kazhdan's property (T)
- Almost invariant vectors for a unitary representation
- Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners
- Hilbert space
- Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous
- Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact
- Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open
- Subgroup
- Left and right cosets $gH$ and $Hg$ of a subgroup
- The subgroup $\langle S \rangle$ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup $\langle g \rangle$, and cyclic groups
- In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure
- Compactly generated locally compact groups
- Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations
- Quasi-regular representations on discrete coset spaces
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bachir Bekka, Pierre de la Harpe and Alain Valette, Kazhdan's Property (T) (Cambridge University Press 2008; author-hosted complete text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Emmanuel Breuillard, PCMI Lecture Notes on Property (T), Expander Graphs and Approximate Groups (standard reference, not scraped)