Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quasi-regular representations on discrete coset spaces

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let G be a topological group and let H≤G be an open subgroup (Subgroup). Give the left coset set X=G/H:={gH:g∈G} its quotient topology. Then X is discrete, and ℓ2(X):=⨁^xH∈XC is a Hilbert space whose norm is the counting-measure norm (Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations, Counting measure on an arbitrary set). The left quasi-regular representation λG/H(g)f(xH):=f(g−1xH) is a strongly continuous unitary representation of G (Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners). Its Dirac vector δH at the identity coset is a unit vector fixed by H. The G-invariant vectors in ℓ2(G/H) are exactly the constant functions; therefore this invariant subspace is nonzero if and only if G/H is finite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a topological group G; an open subgroup H≤G; its left-coset set X=G/H and quotient map q:G→X.

[F1]

Left and right translations in a topological group are homeomorphisms, and the quotient topology declares U⊆X open exactly when q−1(U) is open (Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous, The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection).

[F2]

Under AC, the Hilbert direct sum of copies of C indexed by a set X is a Hilbert space; its elements are square-summable coordinate families, the coordinate vectors δx have norm one, and finite-support vectors are dense by the finite-tail property (Hilbert space, Hilbert direct sums of unitary representations, Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ2(I), Counting measure on an arbitrary set).

[F3]

The formula g⋅(xH)=gxH defines a left action on G/H; its permutations induce the coordinate rule λ(g)δxH=δgxH (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup, Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[F4]

The stabilizer of xH under this action is xHx−1, which is open because conjugation by x is a homeomorphism (Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous).

[F5]

A square-summable family has finite support approximants with arbitrarily small squared tail, and its squared norm is the supremum of finite coordinate sums (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ2(I)).

Proof

Bekka–de la Harpe–Valette use this quasi-regular representation in the proof of Theorem 1.3.1, printed pp. 41–42. The local argument supplies the topology and continuity details needed for the present general open-subgroup statement.

Proof technique: realize ℓ2(G/H) as a coordinate Hilbert sum and prove continuity on the dense finite-support subspace.

1.1F1given

For any coset xH, its preimage under q is xH, which is open because left translation by x is a homeomorphism and H is open. Thus every singleton of the quotient topology on X is open, so X is discrete.

1.2F2F3algebra

By [F2], ℓ2(X) is the Hilbert space of square-summable complex coordinate families on X. The action in [F3] is well defined on left cosets and satisfies the group-action law. For each g∈G, λ(g) permutes the coordinate vectors, so it extends linearly to a norm-preserving bijection with inverse λ(g−1); hence it is unitary and g↦λ(g) is a representation.

1.3F2F3F4

For each xH∈X, the orbit map g↦λ(g)δxH=δgxH is locally constant: at g0 it is constant on the open neighborhood g0xHx−1 by [F4]. A finite linear combination of coordinate vectors therefore has a locally constant orbit map.

1.4F3F5algebra

If η is G-invariant, transitivity of the action in [F3] makes its coordinates equal to one constant c. If X is infinite and c≠0, finite subsets of arbitrarily large cardinality have squared coordinate sum n∣c∣2, contradicting square summability by [F5]; hence the invariant subspace is zero. If X is finite, the constant function 1X is square-summable, nonzero, and invariant. Therefore the invariant subspace is nonzero exactly when G/H is finite.

2.1F2F5step 1.3

Given η∈ℓ2(X) and ϵ>0, choose a finite-support η0 with ∥η−η0∥<ϵ/3 by [F2, F5]. Near any g0∈G, the orbit of η0 is constant by step 1.3, and unitarity gives ∥λ(g)η−λ(g0)η∥≤2∥η−η0∥+∥λ(g)η0−λ(g0)η0∥<ϵ. Thus every orbit map is continuous and λG/H is strongly continuous.

3.1F2F3step 1.2∎

The coordinate vector δH has norm one by [F2]. For h∈H, hH=H, so λ(h)δH=δH by [F3]; thus δH is H-fixed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources