Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Property (T) is a uniform spectral gap over all representations

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and let G be a topological group (Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous). Then G has property (T) (Kazhdan's property (T)) if and only if there are a compact Q⊆G and ε>0 such that for every strongly continuous unitary representation (π,H) of G and every ξ∈(HG)⊥:={v∈H:⟨v,w⟩=0 for every w∈HG},HG:={v∈H:π(g)v=v for every g∈G}, one has sup⁡x∈Q∥π(x)ξ−ξ∥≥ε∥ξ∥. When Q=∅, interpret the left side as 0, matching the displacement convention in Kazhdan pairs, Kazhdan sets and Kazhdan constants. In the property-(T) direction, Q may be chosen to contain the identity. Conversely, any such uniform pair is a Kazhdan pair (Kazhdan pairs, Kazhdan sets and Kazhdan constants). For locally compact Hausdorff G (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not), this is equivalently one compact set and one constant witnessing spectral gap for every unitary representation simultaneously (Spectral gap for a unitary representation).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a topological group G; a strongly continuous unitary representation (π,H); its fixed subspace M=HG; and, as needed, a compact set Q and ε>0.

[F1]

Property (T) is equivalent under AC to the existence of a compact Kazhdan pair. (The Axiom of Choice, Property (T) is equivalent to the existence of a compact Kazhdan pair)

[F2]

A Kazhdan pair (Q,ε) means that every strongly continuous unitary representation with a (Q,ε)-invariant unit vector has a nonzero invariant vector. Property (T) is the same implication when the representation has almost invariant vectors. (Kazhdan pairs, Kazhdan sets and Kazhdan constants, Almost invariant vectors for a unitary representation, Kazhdan's property (T))

[F3]

The subspace M=HG is closed and invariant, its orthogonal complement is closed and invariant, and the restriction to M⊥ has no nonzero invariant vector. (Spectral gap for a unitary representation, Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement)

[F4]

AC implies Countable Choice; under Countable Choice, H=M⊕M⊥ and the orthogonal projection P satisfies Pξ∈M and ξ−Pξ∈M⊥. Orthogonality gives ∥ξ∥2=∥Pξ∥2+∥ξ−Pξ∥2. (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), AC implies DC implies countable choice, Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace, Hilbert projections are linear, self-adjoint and contractive, Pythagoras and finite orthogonal sums)

[F7]

For the empty set, the displacement is defined as 0; adjoining the identity to a compact set preserves compactness and does not weaken a displacement lower bound. (Kazhdan pairs, Kazhdan sets and Kazhdan constants, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous)

Proof

technique · Use a compact Kazhdan pair for the forward direction. For the converse, project a near-invariant unit vector onto the fixed subspace and show its invariant component is nonzero
1.1F1F2F3F7

Suppose G has property (T). By [F1] choose a compact Kazhdan pair (Q0,ε). Put Q=Q0∪{e}; this is compact because a cover has a finite subcover on Q0 and one additional member covering e, and it is still a Kazhdan pair because (Q,ε)-invariance implies (Q0,ε)-invariance. Let π be any strongly continuous unitary representation and ξ∈(HG)⊥. The assertion is immediate for ξ=0. If ξ≠0 and the displayed supremum were less than ε∥ξ∥, then ξ/∥ξ∥ would be a (Q,ε)-invariant unit vector in the restriction to (HG)⊥. By [F3] that restriction has no nonzero invariant vector, contradicting the pair property. Thus the uniform lower bound holds for every π and ξ.

1.2F2F4F5F7algebra

Conversely, assume a compact Q and ε>0 satisfy the uniform bound. Let (π,H) have a (Q,ε)-invariant unit vector ξ. By [F4], write ξ=Pξ+ξ′′ with ξ′′∈(HG)⊥. If ξ′′=0, then Pξ=ξ is already a nonzero invariant vector. If ξ′′≠0 and Q=∅, the uniform inequality reads 0≥ε∥ξ′′∥, a contradiction; so Q is nonempty. Since Pξ is fixed, ∥π(x)ξ′′−ξ′′∥=∥π(x)ξ−ξ∥<ε for every x∈Q. By [F5] the compact-set supremum is a maximum D<ε. Applying the uniform bound to ξ′′ gives ε∥ξ′′∥≤D<ε, so ∥ξ′′∥<1. Orthogonality in [F4] now gives ∥Pξ∥2=1−∥ξ′′∥2>0. Thus Pξ is a nonzero invariant vector, and (Q,ε) is a Kazhdan pair.

2.1F2step 1.2

Let π be any strongly continuous unitary representation of G with almost invariant vectors. Since the Kazhdan pair from step 1.2 has compact Q, almost invariance supplies a (Q,ε)-invariant unit vector; step 1.2 then gives a nonzero invariant vector. This is property (T) by [F2].

3.1F1F4F6F7step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Steps 1.1–2.1 prove the equivalence and show that a compact Kazhdan pair is itself a uniform spectral-gap witness. For the locally compact Hausdorff clause, apply [F6] to each representation. If a uniform witness has empty Q, the bound forces every fixed-space complement to be zero and {e} is then a common witness; otherwise adjoining e preserves the lower bound by [F7]. Thus a single compact set and constant witness spectral gap simultaneously for all representations exactly when G has property (T). AC is used through the pair-equivalence theorem and, via Countable Choice, by the orthogonal-decomposition/projection suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

89 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources